Integral and dynamic methodology applied to scheduling and control project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.11778Keywords:
CPM, Systems Dynamic, MPSP, project control, integral and dynamic methodologyAbstract
This paper presents the implementation of the integral and dynamic methodology in the scheduling and dynamic control of projects. For this purpose and using the above-mentioned methodology, a model which combines activity networks AON (activity on node), CPM, multimode execution and system dynamics is developed. The model is operationalized by developing two separate networks, i.e., a scheduling network on the one hand and the execution network on the other hand, in order to interact through a control loop. The proposal is validated using activity networks with 16 activities selected from MRCPSP of PSPLIB library. The model derived from the methodology has significant advantages in characteristic indicators of the project management. The paper concludes with a proposal of new combinations of tools, which, together with the methodology, can address problems of scheduling and control of projects with greater variability and complexity.
Downloads
References
F. Ballestin. Nuevos métodos de resolución del problema de secuenciación de proyectos con recursos limitados. 1a ed. Ed. Universitat de Valencia-Servei de publicacions. Valencia (España). 2002. pp. 5-9.
J. Forrester. Industrial Dynamics. Ed. Pegasus communications, M.I.T. Press. Cambridge. 1961. pp. 9-101.
J. Forrester. Principles of systems. Ed. Wright-Allen Press. Cambridge. 1968. pp.1-79.
P. Senge. The fifth discipline. Ed. Doubleday. New York (U.S.A). 1994. pp.378-390.
J. Sterman. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Ed. McGraw-Hill/ Irwin. (U.S.A). 2000. pp. 41-290.
D. Drew. Dinámica de sistemas Aplicada. Isdefe. Madrid (España). 1995. pp. 67-163.
D. Kalenatic, L. González, C. López, L. Arias. “El sistema de gestión tecnológica como parte del sistema logístico en la era del conocimiento”. Cuadernos de Administración. Vol. 22. 2009. pp. 257-286.
D. Kalenatic, L. Mancera, K. Moreno, L. González. “Metodología de planeación logística basada en gestión de proyectos y dinámica de sistemas en empresas prestadoras de servicios”. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquía. Nº. 58. 2011. pp. 208-218.
D. Kalenatic, C. Lopez, L. González, F. Rueda. Modelos Matemáticos aplicados a la logística Focalizada, Ed. Kalenatic. Bogotá. 2010. pp 8-25.
R. Slowinski, B. Soniewicki, J. Weglarz. “DSS for multiobjective project scheduling”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 79. 1994. pp. 220-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90353-0
J. R. Meredith, S. J. Mantel. Project Management: a Managerial Approach. Ed. John Wiley & Sons. New York (USA). 2003. pp. 20 - 30.
D. Kalenatic. Técnicas de planeación de redes. 1 ed. Ed. Universidad Disrital Francisco José de Caldas. Biblioteca catedráticos. Bogota (Colombia). 1987. pp.1-3.
C. Gray, E. Larson. Project Management: The Managerial Process. Ed. McGraw-Hill. Singapore. 2006. pp. 5-20.
J. Aristizábal, H. Zárate. Diseño e Implementación de un Algoritmo Genético para la Calendarización de Actividades de un Proyecto Variando la Disponibilidad de los Recursos. Ed. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Bogota (Colombia). 2006. pp. 48-49.
S. Elmaghraby, J. Kamburowski. “The analysis of activity networks under generalized precedence relations (GPRs)”. Management science. Vol.38. 1992. pp. 1245-1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1245
R. Bey, R. Doersch, J. Patterson. “The Net Present Value Criterion: Its Impact on Project Schedulin.” Project Management Quaterly. Vol. 12. 1981. pp. 35-45.
R. Kolisch, R. Padman. “An Integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling”. Omega. Vol. 29. 2000. pp. 249-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00046-3
R. Slowinski. “Multiobjective project scheduling under multiple-category resource constraints”. R. Slowinski, J. Weglarz (editors). Advances in project scheduling, Ed. Elsevier. Amsterdam. 1989. pp. 151- 167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-87358-3.50011-0
A. Sprecher, A. Drexl. “Multi-mode resourceconstrained project scheduling by a simple, general and powerful sequencing algorithm”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 107. 1998. pp. 431-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00348-2
E. Herroelen, B. Demeulemeester, A. De Reyck. “Classification Scheme for Project Scheduling”. J. Weglarz, Project Scheduling – Recent Models, Algorithms and Applications. Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Boston (USA). 1999. pp. 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5533-9_1
O. Icmeli, W. Rom. “Ensuring quality in Resourse Constrained project Scheduling”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 103. 1997. pp. 483-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00305-0
O. Icmeli, W. Rom. “Analysis of the Characteristics of projects in Diverse Industries”. Journal of Operational Research Management. Vol. 16. 1998. pp. 43-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00016-8
M. Bandelloni, M. Tucci, R. Rinaldi. “Optimal resource leveling using non-serial dynamic programming”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 78. 1994. pp. 162-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90380-8
K. Brinkmann, K. Neumann. “Heuristic procedures for resource-constrained project scheduling with minimal and maximal time lags the resource leveling and the minimum project-duration problem”. Journal of Decision Systems. Vol. 5. 1996. pp. 129-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.1996.10511678
E. Demeulemeester, W. Herroelen, S. Elmaghraby. “Optimal Procedures for the Discrete Time/cost TradeOff Problem in project Networks”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 88. 1996. pp. 50-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00181-2
S. Rozenes, G. Vitner, S. Spraggett. “Multidimensional Project Control System”. Project Management Journal. Vol. 22. 2004. pp. 109-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00002-4
S. Rozenes, G. Vitner, S. Praggett. “Project Control: Literature Review”. Project Management Journal. Vol. 37. 2006. pp. 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700402
T. Raz, E. Erdal. “Optimal timing of project control points”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 127. 2000. pp. 252-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00492-0
K. Cooper. “Naval Ship Production: A Claim Settled and A Framework Built”. Interfaces. Vol. 10. 1980. pp. 20-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.10.6.20
D. Kalenatic, C. López, L. González, F. Rueda. Logística Focalizada: Aspectos conceptuales y modelos aplicados. Ed. Universidad Católica de Colombia. Bogotá (Colombia). 2010. pp. 35-51.
E. Wolstenholme. System Enquiry - A System Dynamics Approach. Ed. John Wiley & Sons. Chicbester (Inglaterra). 1990. pp. 100-185.
T. Abdel-Hamid, S. Madnick, Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach. Ed. Prentice-Hall. New Jersey (USA). 1991. pp. 63-135.
T. Williams. “The Effects of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs”. Journal of the Operational Research Society. Vol. 46. 1995. pp. 809-818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1995.114
A. Rodrigues, J. Bowers. “System Dynamics in Project Management: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Methods”. System Dynamics Review. Vol. 12. 1996. pp. 121-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199622)12:2<121::AID-SDR99>3.3.CO;2-O
J. Lyneis, K. Cooper, S. Els. “Strategic Management of Complex Projects: A Case Study Using System Dynamics”. System Dynamics Review. Vol. 17. 2001. pp. 237-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.213
A. Rodrigues. SYDPIM integration of SD and PERT/ CPM tools: Assessing Fagan Analysis in a largescale software project. Memorias 17 International conference of de system dynamics society. Wellington. New Zealand. N.º 123. 1999. pp. 1-13.
K. Choi, D. Bae. “Dynamic project performance estimation by combining static estimation models with system dynamics”. Information and software technology. Vol. 51. 2009. pp. 162-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.03.001
S. Lee, F. Peña-Mora, M. Park. “Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management”. Automation in construction. Vol. 15. 2006. pp. 84-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.008
E. Demeulemeester, W. Herroelen. Project Scheduling, A research Handbook. Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers. USA. 2002. pp. 160-500.
T. Williams. “Assessing Extension of Time delays on major projects”. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 21. 2003. pp. 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00060-6
A. Al-Momani, “Construction delay: a quantitative analysis”. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 18. 2000. pp. 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00060-X
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Facultad de Ingeniería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
The material published in the journal can be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if the respective credits are given to the journal. No commercial benefit can be obtained and derivative works must be under the same license terms as the original work.
Twitter