On negativity and subjectivity: Kierkegaard

Authors

  • María Juliana Silva Arango University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rpsua.v9n1a08

Keywords:

Irony, Socrates, Maieutics, Objective, Uncertainty, Objective truth, Philosophy, Ethics, Psychoanalysis

Abstract

Kierkegaard’s Irony was an operation by which commonly accepted customs and historical practices could be criticized, by promoting wisdom through delivering  no positive philosophical doctrine or theory to others who claimed to know something. This was his ‘Socratic task.’ Similar to Socrates, Kierkegaard focused his intellectual efforts on understanding what it meant to be a human and how to pursue a life worth of living. To his view, truly existing individuals, who obeyed the natural human desire to know, would embrace the negativity of uncertainty and take responsibility for their personal views. His Christian understanding of God, as related to subjectivity, was what he meant to defend by applying Irony. When confronting the Clergy of the Copenhagen of his time, Kierkegaard learnt the political consequences to the commitment to Socrates’ method in the way he  applied it to his modern setting.

|Abstract
= 954 veces | PDF
= 165 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Juliana Silva Arango, University of Antioquia

Psychologist graduated from the University of Antioquia 

References

Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/podzim2014/LJMgrB07/um/Cambridge_Dictionary_of_Philosophy.pdf.

Kierkegaard, S. (1992a). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume I. Copenhaguen, 1846: Princeton University Press.

Kierkegaard, S. (1992b). The Concept of Irony. Copenhagen, 1841: Princeton University Press.

Kierkegaard, S. (1995). Works of Love: Some Christian Deliberations in the Form of Discourses, p. 27. 1847: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hpg2.

Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Papers VI , B 66. Copenhaguen, 1845: Princeton University Press.

Ogilvie, D. (2014). The Anatomy of Internalized Beliefs. Soul belifs: Causes and Consequences. New Jersey: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Retrieved from: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/ogilvie/Anatomy.htm.

Plato. (380 BC). Πολιτεία, The Republic, verse 354 b-c. Plato. (399 BC). πολογία Σωκράτους, Apology, verse 23 a-c. Translation Jowett, Benjamin.

Plato. (399 BC). πολογία Σωκράτους, Apology, verse 28 b-d. Translation Jowett, Benjamin.

Stewart, J. (2015). Søren Kierkegaard: Subjectivity, Irony and the Crisis of Modernity. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-12

How to Cite

Silva Arango, M. J. (2017). On negativity and subjectivity: Kierkegaard. Revista De Psicología Universidad De Antioquia, 9(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rpsua.v9n1a08

Issue

Section

Artículo de reflexión