Direct Perception. Response to Burgos and Roca’s Commentaries

Authors

  • Pablo Covarrubias University of Guadalajara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350701

Keywords:

Cognitive Theories, Inference, Ecological Approach, Information, Direct Perception

Abstract

This response article is intended to respond to Burgos and Roca’s comments on my target article in this monograph. When reviewing some of the challenges made by Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981) to the notion of direct perception, one of the main assumptions of traditional cognitive theories is delineated —i.e., perception is based on inferences— and alternatives are proposed from the ecological approach to these questionings. Some limitations of the concept of information, which is central in the ecological approach, are reviewed, and the scope that the ecological program has had in other fields of study, other disciplines and in psychology are mentioned. Finally, we reflect on the relationship between the sensitivity to contingencies of reinforcement and the detection of invariants.

|Abstract
= 297 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 185 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Covarrubias, University of Guadalajara

PhD in Behavioral Science; research professor at the Center for Research in Comparative Behavior and Cognition. University of Guadalajara, Mexico.

References

Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1901%2Fjeab.2012.97-101

Bravo, S. M. J., Ramos, R. M. y Covarrubias, P. (2019). Tutorial: una revisión del enfoque ecológico de Gibson sobre la percepción visual. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 45, 261-273. http://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v45.i2.75565

Bruggeman, H., Zosh, W. y Warren, W. H. (2007). Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation. Current Biology, 17, 2035–2040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.059

Burgos, J. E. (2022). Más melodramas. Comentario crítico a Covarrubias. Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia, 14(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350703

Cabrera, F., Sanabria, F., Jiménez, Á. A. y Covarrubias, P. (2013). An affordance analysis of unconditioned lever pressing in rats and hamsters. Behavioural Processes, 92, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.003

Costall, A. y Morris, P. (2015). The “textbook Gibson”: the assimilation of dissidence. History of Psychology, 18, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038398

Covarrubias, P. (2022). Percepción directa: detectando las propiedades relacionales permanentes en los patrones de estimulación cambiantes. Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia, 14(2), e350102. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350102

Covarrubias, P., Cabrera, F. y Jiménez, Á. A. (2017). Invariants and information pickup in the senses considered as perceptual systems: implications for the experimental analysis of behavior. Ecological Psychology, 29, 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1332460

Covarrubias, P., Cabrera, F. y Jiménez, Á. A. (2021). Detection of invariants in probabilistic relations between events by means of exploratory behaviors. Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues, 13, 68-80. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/jbhsi/article/view/77678

Covarrubias, P., Cabrera, F., Jiménez, Á. A. y Costall, A. (2017). The ecological revolution: the senses considered as perceptual systems, 50 years later – Part 2. Ecological Psychology, 29, 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1331316

Covarrubias, P., Guzmán, R., Cabrera, F. y Jiménez, A. A. (2011). Las superficies ambientales, la velocidad y la aceleración en hámsteres y ratas. En H. Martínez, J. J. Irigoyen, F. Cabrera, J. Varela, P. Covarrubias y A. A. Jiménez (Eds.), Estudios sobre comportamiento y aplicaciones (pp. 95–115). Ediciones de la Noche.

Covarrubias, P., Jiménez, Á. A., Cabrera, F. y Costall, A. (2017). The senses considered as perceptual systems: the revolutionary ideas of Gibson’s 1966 book, 50 years later–Part 1. Ecological Psychology, 29, 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1297680

Fodor, J. y Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). How direct is visual perception: some reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach. Cognition, 9, 139–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90009-3

Gibson, J. J. (1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00656.x

Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.

Gibson, J. J. (1979/2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. Classic edition. Psychology Press.

Gibson, J. J. y Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: differentiation or enrichment Psychological Review, 62, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048826

Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G. A., Reynolds, H. N. y Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 113-116. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210533

Heft, H. (2014). The tension between the psychological and ecological sciences: making psychology more ecological. En T. Pearce, G. Barker, and E. Desjardins (Eds.), Entangled life: organism and environment in the biological sciences (51–78). Springer.

Heft, H. (2020). Ecological psychology and enaction theory: divergent groundings. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00991

Jiménez, Á. A., Ochoa, D. A., Amazeen, P. G., Amazeen, E. L. y Cabrera, F. (2019). Affordances guide choice behavior between equal schedules of reinforcement in rats. Ecological Psychology, 31, 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2019.1599686

Jiménez, Á. A., Romero, K.D., Salas, M. y Covarrubias, P. (2021). Adquisición de la conducta operante: no todas las alturas de palanca funcionan igual. Conductual, 9, 30-44. https://conductual.com/articulos/No%20todas%20las%20alturas%20de%20palanca%20funcionan%20igual.pdf

Kaplan, G. A. (1969). Kinetic disruption of optical texture: the perception of depth at an edge. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 193-198. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207015

Katagiri, M., Kao, S. F., Simon, A. M., Castro, L. y Wasserman, E.A. (2007). Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies. Behavioural Processes, 74, 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.001

Killeen, P.R. y Glenberg, A. (2010). Resituating cognition. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 4, 66-85. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3819/ccbr.2010.50003

Killeen, P. R. y Jacobs. K. W. (2016). Coal is not black, snow is not white, food is not a reinforcer: the roles of affordances and dispositions in the analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 40, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs40614-016-0080-7

Kountouriotis, G. K. y Wilkie, R. M. (2013). Displaying optic flow to simulate locomotion: comparing heading and steering. i-Perception, 4, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fi0590

Mace, W. M. (1977). James J. Gibson’s strategy for perceiving: ask not what’s inside your head, but what your head’s inside of. En R. Shaw y J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 43–65). Erlbaum.

Mace, W. M. (2020). Getting into the ambient optic array and what we might get out of it. En J. Wagman y J. Blau (Eds.), Perception as information detection: reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 73-89). Taylor and Francis.

Mossio, M. y Taraborelli, D. (2008). Action-dependent perceptual invariants: from ecological to sensorimotor approaches. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1324-1340. https://doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.003

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.

Roca, J. (2022). Comentario al escrito de Pablo Covarrubias. Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia, 14(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350706

Stahlman, W. D. y Blaisdell, A. P. (2011). The modulation of operant variation by the probability, magnitude, and delay of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 42, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2011.05.001

Tonneau, F. (2011). Holt’s realism: new reasons for behavior analysis. En E. Charles (Ed.), A new look at new realism. the psychology and philosophy of E.B. Holt (pp. 33-55). Transaction Publishers.

Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S. y Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: in reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90002-0

Wagman, J. B. y Blau, J. (2020). Perception as information detection: reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Taylor and Francis. Wagman, J. B., Lozano, A., Jiménez, Á. A., Covarrubias, P. y Cabrera, F. (2019).

Perception of affordances in the animal kingdom and beyond. En I. Zepeda, F. Cabrera, J. A. Camacho y E. Camacho (Eds.), Aproximaciones al estudio del comportamiento y sus aplicaciones. Vol. ii (pp. 70-108). Universidad de Guadalajara.

Warren, W. H., Kay, B. A., Zosh, W. D. Duchon, A. P. y Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/84054

Withagen, R. y Van Der Kamp, J. (2010). Towards a new ecological conception of perceptual information: lessons from a developmental systems perspective. Human Movement Science, 29, 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.003

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Covarrubias, P. (2022). Direct Perception. Response to Burgos and Roca’s Commentaries. Revista De Psicología Universidad De Antioquia, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350701

Issue

Section

Artículo de reflexión derivado de investigación