The laboratory in physiology teaching:Tales of Veterinary Medicine students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.18.2.04

Keywords:

laboratory, physiology, experience, diary, stories

Abstract

In order to explore the vision of the students of Veterinary Medicine of the National University on the role of the laboratory in the teaching of physiology, field journals were constructed where the students related in a personal way the events experienced during the practices of laboratory with the methodology of learning based on inquiry. The objective was to explore the students’ experience through the narrative analysis of some journals in order to reconstruct a story for each student during their passage through the laboratory. As a result it was evidenced that for students the physiology laboratory can be a space to reinforce, put into practice and perpetuate knowledge, for social interaction, moral reflection, a place outside of routine, the development of higher thinking skills and the intrigue to explore the nature of the organism.

|Abstract
= 337 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 149 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 205 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

David Fernando Balaguera Quinche, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Veterinary Doctor, Master in Physiology. Professor of Physiology. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Applied and Environmental Sciences.

Leonardo Gómez Duarte, National University of Colombia

Veterinary Zootechnician, Master in Physiology. Teaching Research Group in Narrative, National University of Colombia, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine.

References

Ahrash, N. y Lemons, P. (2006). A new method for assessing critical thinking in the classroom. Bioscience, 56 (1), 66 – 77. Recuperado de: https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/56/1/66/224850

Alice, W. (2005). The evolving role of animal laboratories in physiology instruction. Adv. Physiol Educ., 29, 144–150. Recuperado de: https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/advan.00017.2005

Beatriz, F. Rochelle, R. Sonia, R. Ricardo, H. Silva, A. Maria, J. Rocha, R. (2016). Perceptions of undergraduate students on the use of animals in practical clases. Adv. Physiol Educ. 40, 422– 424. Recuperado de: https://www.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/advan.00019.2016

Casotti, G.; Rieser, D. y Knabb, M. (2008). Successful implementation of inquiry-based physiology laboratories in undergraduate major and nonmajor courses. Adv. Physiol Educ., 32, 286–296. Recuperado de: https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/advan.00100.2007

Connelly, M. y Clandinin, J. (1995). Relatos de experiencia e investigación narrativa: hoy todos son constructivistas. Cuadernos De Pedagogía, 257, 78-84.

Eberlein, T. Jack, K. Vicky, M. Moog, R. Terry, P. Pratibha, V. White, H. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: a comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36 (4), 262–273. Recuperado de: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2665262/

Ghorbani, A. Ghazvini, K. (2016). Using paper presentation breaks during didactic lectures improves learning of physiology in undergraduate students. Adv. Physiol Educ., 40, 93 – 97. Recuperado de: https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/advan.00137.2015

Hanson, D. (2006). Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning, Department of Chemistry. Stony Brook University. New York, EE. UU.: Pacific Crest. Recuperado de: https://pcrest.com/research/POGIL_Instructor_Guide2014.pdf

Kolkhorst, F.; Mason, C.; Dana, M.; Patricia, P. y Michael, J. (2001). An Inquiry-Based Learning Model for an Exercise Physiology Laboratory. Adv. Physiol Educ., 25, 45 -50. Recuperado de: https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/advances.2001.25.2.45

Moog, R.; Creegan, F.; Hanson, D.; Spencer, J. y Straumanis, A (2006). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: Pogil and the Pogil Project. Metropol Univ. J., 17, 41–51. Recuperado de: https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/muj/article/view/20287/19880

Orlf, M. (2012). Real-Time Drawings: Sketches That Help Students Understand Difficult Concepts. Has Educator, 16 (2), 25 – 27.

Richard, W.; Gregory, A.; Schmidt, J.; Lawrence, D.; Sanjeev, G. y Paul, T. (1994). Cardiovascular Physiology Teaching: Computer Simulations Vs. Animal Demonstrations. Adv. Physiol. Educ., 266, 6-46. Recuperado de: https://www.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/advances.1994.266.6.S36

Ruiz, G. (2013). La Teoría De La Experiencia De John Dewey: Significación histórica y vigencia en el debate teórico contemporáneo. Foro De Educación, 11 (15), 103-124. Recuperado de: https://www.forodeeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/fde/article/view/260

Shore, N.; Shireen, K.; Miraa, Q. y Muhammad, A. (2013). Animal laboratory, interactive and computer based learning in enhancing basic concepts in physiology: an outlook of 481 undergraduate medical students. Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 25 (1-2), 57-59. Recuperado de: http://www.jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/view/1851

Soltis, R.; Verlinden, N.; Kruger, N.; Carroll, A. y Trumbo, T. (2015). process-oriented guided inquiry learning strategy enhances students’ higher-level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical sciences course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79 (1),1-8. Recuperado de: https://www.ajpe.org/doi/full/10.5688/ajpe79111

Swift, A. (2016). Is labtutor a helpful component of the blended learning approach to biosciences? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25 (17-18), 2683-2693. Recuperado de: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocn.13175

Published

2018-12-22

How to Cite

Balaguera Quinche, D. F., & Gómez Duarte, L. (2018). The laboratory in physiology teaching:Tales of Veterinary Medicine students. Uni-Pluriversidad, 18(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.18.2.04

Issue

Section

RESEARCH REPORTS AND UNPUBLISHED ESSAYS