Factors Associated with Cigarette Consumption in a High Socioeconomic Level Peruvian District

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e357489

Keywords:

consumo de cigarrillo, factores socioeconómicos, salud pública

Abstract

Objective: To identify and classify the socioeconomic factors associated with cigarette consumption in a high socioeconomic level district in Peru.

Methods: A cross-sectional study using data from the “Health and Determinants Census of the San Borja District” (2021–2022) with 49,082 respondents. The analysis focused on individuals who answered whether they had smoked cigarettes in the past 12 months. Variables such as cigarette consumption, sex, age, educational level, marital status, employment status, and others were analyzed using binary logistic regression and Chi-Squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) decision tree analysis.

Results: The smoking rate was 3.70%. Adults without a partner were 1.46 times more likely to smoke. Those living in shared apartments were 1.38 times more likely, and individuals without their own home were 2.01 times more likely. Men were 2.574 times more likely to smoke than women. The CHAID decision tree revealed that job instability was a key factor for men, while economic crises and household criminal incidents were significant for women.

Conclusions: Job instability in men and precarious living conditions in women were associated with cigarette consumption. The main socioeconomic profile of cigarette smokers included being male, not owning a home, and being single.

|Abstract
= 0 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alberto Guevara-Tirado, Universidad Científica del Sur

Maestro en Medicina Humana

References

1. Bryazka D, Reitsma MB, Abate YH, et al. Forecasting the effects of smoking prevalence scenarios on years of life lost and life expectancy from 2022 to 2050: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(10):e729-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00166-x

2. Anuththiga. Global tobacco control information & statistics I. Tobacco Atlas. [internet]. 2022 [citado 2024 oct. 30]. Disponible en: https://tobaccoatlas.org/?form=MG0AV3

3. Benowitz NL. Pharmacology of nicotine: Addiction, smoking-induced disease, and therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;49(1):57-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094742

4. Livingstone-Banks J, Fanshawe TR, Thomas KH, et al. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Libr. 2023;(6):CD006103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006103.pub9

5. Li X, Semenova S, D’Souza MS, et al. Involvement of glutamatergic and GABAergic systems in nicotine dependence: Implications for novel pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation. Neuropharmacology. 2014;76:554-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.042

6. Serrano Gotarredona MP, Navarro Herrero S, et al. Enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales relacionadas con el tabaco. Radiología. 2022;64:277-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2022.10.008

7. Fernández González EM, Figueroa Oliva DA. Tabaquismo y su relación con las enfermedades cardiovasculares. Rev Habanera Cienc Médicas [internet]. 2018 [citado 2023 jul. 9];17(2):225-35. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1729-519X2018000200008&script=sci_arttext

8. Kondo T, Nakano Y, et al. Effects of tobacco smoking on cardiovascular disease. Circ J. 2019;83(10):1980-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-19-0323

9. NHS. Passive smoking. nhs.uk [internet]. 2024 [citado 2024 oct. 30]. Disponible en: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/quit-smoking/passive-smoking-protect-your-family-and-friends/

10. Dai X, Gakidou E, Lopez AD. Evolution of the global smoking epidemic over the past half century: Strengthening the evidence base for policy action. Tob Control. 2022;31(2):129-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056535

11. Bernabé-Ortiz A, Carrillo-Larco RM. Prevalencia y tendencias de tabaquismo activo y pasivo en adolescentes peruanos. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica [internet]. 2022 [citado 2024 jun. 16]; 39(2):193-200. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rins/v39n2/1726-4642-rpmesp-39-02-193.pdf

12. Urbina Padilla ED, Zarsosa Osorio IA. Prevalencia del consumo de drogas ilícitas (marihuana) y lícitas (tabaco y alcohol) en los adolescentes del Colegio Alfonso Laso Bermeo de la ciudad de Quito en el período 2017-2018 [tesis de pregrado]. [Quito]: Universidad de las Américas [internet]; 2019 [citado 2023 jul. 9]. Disponible en: https://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/11612

13. Fernando HN, Wimaladasa ITP, Sathkoralage AN, et al. Socioeconomic factors associated with tobacco smoking among adult males in Sri Lanka. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7147-9

14. Qattan AMN, Boachie MK, et al. Socioeconomic determinants of smoking in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5665. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115665

15. Lisha NE, Delucchi KL, et al. Prevalence and correlates of social smoking in young adults: Comparisons of behavioral and self-identified definitions. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(9):1076-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu242

16. Orco Díaz A. Gasto público en inversiones y reducción de la pobreza regional en el Perú, período 2009-2018. Quipukamayoc. 2020;28(56):9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/quipu.v28i56.17087

17. Gobierno de Perú, Gerencia de Red Integrada de Salud de la Municipalidad Distrital de San Borja. Censo de Salud y Determinantes del Distrito de San Borja [internet]; 2021-2022 [citado 2024 jun. 16]. Disponible en: https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/censo-de-salud-y-determinantes-del-distrito-de-san-borja-municipalidad-distrital-de-san

18. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Dasarrollo. El reto de la igualdad. Una lectura de las dinámicas territoriales en el Perú. Lima [internet]; 2019 [citado 2024 jun. 16]. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/pe/PNUD-Peru---El-Reto-de-la-Igualdad.pdf

19. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Cuadros estadísticos de población, vivienda y hogar. En: Resultados Definitivos de la provincia de Lima. Tomo I. Lima [internet]. 2018 [citado 2023 jul. 9]. pp. 63-951. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1583/15ATOMO_01.pdf

20. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al., RECORD Working Committee. The Reporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement. PLoS Med. [internet] 2015 [citado año mes día]; 12(10):e1001885. Disponible en: http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/record/

21. Szumilas M. Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry [internet]. 2010 [citado 2023 jul. 9]; 19(3):227-9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20842279

22. Yilmaz AE. How reliable are the multiple comparison methods for odds ratio? J Appl Stat. 2022;49(12):3141-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2022.2104229

23. Cruz APD. Predicting the relapse category in patients with tuberculosis: A chi-square automatic interaction detector (CHAID) decision tree analysis. Open J Soc Sci. 2018;6(12):29-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.612003

24. Asociación Médica Mundial (ANM). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM – Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en participantes humanos [internet]; 2024 [citado 2024 nov. 15]. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/

25. Theilmann M, Lemp JM, Winkler V, et al. Patterns of tobacco use in low and middle income countries by tobacco product and sociodemographic characteristics: Nationally representative survey data from 82 countries. BMJ. 2022;e067582. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067582

26. Castillo-Riquelme M, Bardach A, et al. Health burden and economic costs of smoking in Chile: The potential impact of increasing cigarettes prices. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237967. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237967

27. Van Bui T, Blizzard L, Luong KN, et al. Declining prevalence of tobacco smoking in Vietnam. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(7):831-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu202

28. Dozier AM, Ossip-Klein DJ, Diaz S, et al. Tobacco use in the Dominican Republic: Understanding the culture first. Tob Control. 2006;15(Supl. 1):i30-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.014852

29. Pérez-Pareja FJ, García-Pazo P, Jiménez R, et al. Dejar de fumar, terapia cognitivo-conductual y perfiles diferenciales con árboles de decisión. Clin Salud. 2020; 31(3):137-45. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/clysa2020a12

30. Syamlal G, Mazurek JM, Dube SR. Gender differences in smoking among U.S. working adults. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(4):467-75. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25049215/

31. Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Do smoking habits differ between women and men in contemporary Western populations? Evidence from half a million people in the UK Biobank study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e005663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005663

32. Reddy-Jacobs C, Téllez-Rojo MM, Meneses-González F, et al. Pobreza, jóvenes y consumo de tabaco en México. Salud Pública Méx [internet]. 2006 [citado 2024 oct. 31];48(Supl. 1):s83-90. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342006000700010

33. Bader P, Boisclair D, Ferrence R. Effects of tobacco taxation and pricing on smoking behavior in high risk populations: A knowledge synthesis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(11):4118-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8114118

34. Keir EF, Bu F, Polkey MI, et al. Relationship of smoking with current and future social isolation and loneliness: 12-year follow-up of older adults in England. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022;14(100302):100302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100302

35. Pichon-Riviere A, Bardach A, Rodríguez Cairoli F, et al. Health, economic and social burden of tobacco in Latin America and the expected gains of fully implementing taxes, plain packaging, advertising bans and smoke-free environments control measures: A modelling study. Tob Control. 2024;33:611-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057618

36. Amiri S. Smoking and alcohol use in unemployed populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Addict Dis. 2022;40(2):254-77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2021.1981124

37. Prochaska JJ, Michalek AK, Brown-Johnson C, et al. Likelihood of unemployed smokers vs nonsmokers attaining reemployment in a one-year observational study. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):662-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0772

38. Kim B, Lee Y, Kwon YD, et al. Factors associated with indoor smoking at home: A focus on socioeconomic status in South Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020067. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020067

Published

2025-03-10

How to Cite

1.
Guevara-Tirado A. Factors Associated with Cigarette Consumption in a High Socioeconomic Level Peruvian District. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 10 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];43:e357489. Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/357489

Issue

Section

Condiciones de salud

Categories

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.