Un  melodrama de la psicología

José E Burgos

doi:10.17533/udea.rp.e350101

Authors

José E Burgos University of Guadalajara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350101

Keywords:

Melodrama, Psychology, Subject Matter, Behaviorism, Mentalism, Dualism

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss critically a debate I consider as melodramatic for excessive and scientifically sterile, namely, what is the proper subject matter of psychology. On one side of this debate, there are radical behaviorism and interbehaviorism, which postulate behavior and interbehavior, respectively, as the proper subject matters of psychology, with an obsession for an ontological and epistemological separation from the rest of science, as well as from mentalistic psychology falsely accused of dualistic. On the other side, there is mentalism, with an equally separatist obsession, especially from biology. This melodrama, behavior versus mind, is plagued with theatrical handwaving that in some cases seeks to force psychological research agendas largely motivated by personal interests and tastes. I argue that this melodrama only hinders progress in psychology, and that in such cases threatens intellectual freedom, acquiring normative overtones in the hands of people with economic and political power. My suggestion is moderation in this debate, supplemented by a greater general philosophical culture and respect for academic intellectual freedom.

|Abstract

= 2259 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 3150 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José E Burgos, University of Guadalajara

Ph.D. in Neuroscience and Behavior from the University of Massachusetts. Researcher at the Center for Studies and Research in Behavior at the University of Guadalajara.

References

Broadbent, D. A. (1958). Perception and communication. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10037-000

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J. y Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. Wiley DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1292061

Burgos, J. E. (2015). Antidualism and antimentalism in radical behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy, 43, 1–37. https://www.behavior.org/resources/915.pdf

Burgos, J. E. (2016). Mentalism versus dualism: Replies to commentaries. Behavior and Philosophy, 44, 46–79. https://www.behavior.org/resources/997.pdf

Burgos, J. E. (2019). Selection by reinforcement: A critical reappraisal. Behavioural Processes, 161, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.019

Burgos, J. E. (2021). The real problem with hypothetical constructs. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44, 683–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0

Burgos, J. E. (en prensa). Training an artificial neural network in a false-belief task with pavlovian contingencies. En J. E. Burgos, F. W. Grasso, O. García-Leal, y R. Akram (Eds.), The mindreading brains. Springer.

Burgos, J. E. y Castiello, S. (en prensa). Pavlovian impulsivity: Connectionist predictions with implications for addiction. En P. Gargiulio y H. L. Mesones-Arroyo (Eds.), Psychiatry and neuroscience update: From translational research to drug addictions and psychoses. Springer.

Burgos, J. E. y Galeazzi, J. M. (2021). Neural network simulations of a possible role of the hippocampus in pavlovian conditioning. En P. A. Gargiulo, y H. L. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61721-9_23

Mesones-Arroyo (Eds.), Psychiatry and neuroscience update: From epistemology to clinical psychiatry, Vol. iv (pp. 303–325). Springer.

Burgos, J. E. y Killeen, P. R. (2019). Suing for peace in the war against mentalism. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42, 241–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0169-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0169-2

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Back Bay Books.

Eckard, M. L. y Lattal, K. A. (2020). The internal clock: A manifestation of a misguided mechanistic view of causation? Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5

Gibbon, J. y Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. En C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, y J. Gibbon, (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219–253). Academic Press.

Kantor, J. R. (1933). A survey of the science of psychology. Principia Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10792-000

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.

Kulstad, M. (1993). Two interpretations of the pre-established harmony in the philosophy of Leibniz. Synthese, 96, 477–504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20117824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064013

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational approach. Freeman & Co.

Mendola, J. (2008). Anti-externalism. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534999.001.0001

Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. McGraw-Hill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11135-000

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C. y Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048495

Place, U. T. (1956). Is consciousness a brain process? British Journal of Psychology, 47, 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1956.tb00560.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1956.tb00560.x

Putnam, H. (1960). Minds and machines. En S. Hook (Ed.), Dimensions of mind (pp. 138–164). New York University Press.

Putnam, H. (1967). Psychological predicates. En W. H. Capitan y D. D. Merrill (Eds.), Art, mind, and religion (pp. 37–48). University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.6380610.6

Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. mit Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5891.001.0001

Rescorla, R. A. y Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. En A. H. Black y W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Robinson, R. (1954). Definition. Clarendon.

Russell, B. (1912). On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 1–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4543833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/13.1.1

Sangiacomo, A. (2017). Malebranche’s arguments for occasionalism in their historical context. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 34, 133–154. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44983511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/44983511

Schlick, M. (1925). General theory of knowledge (Trad. A. E. Blumberg, 1974). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3099-5

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Shapiro, L. (Ed., Trad., 2007). Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes: The correspondence between princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226204444.001.0001

Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. The Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1931.9918416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1931.9918416

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. The Free Press.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Alfred A. Knopf.

Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649

Stout, S. C. y Miller, R. R. (2007). Sometimes-competing retrieval (socr): A formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114(3), 759–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.759

Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 398–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Vilarroya, O. (2017). Neural representation. a survey-based analysis of the notion. Frontiers in Psychology: Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01458

Voss, S. (1993). Simplicity and the seat of the soul. En S. Voss (Ed.), Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes (pp. 128–141). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195075519.003.0010

Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. The People’s Institute.