Forming Researchers in Qualitative Health under Productivism: Sharing Concerns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33s1a04Keywords:
qualitative research, research training, public health, qualitative methodology in health, health investigationAbstract
Objective: To analyze, from different perspectives, the formation of qualitative health researchers giving special emphasis to the productivist regime and its impacts on academic assessment. Method: conceptual construction exploring through reflective method, epistemological, ethical, political aspects which combine their aspects under a complex view. The scenario is the current context of the Brazilian collective health field, taken as an illustration of what has been happening in many other countries, where training in qualitative health research suffers major constraints due to the current conception of productivity. Results: In the contemporary social context, the founding values of productivism are evident, not only in the academic field, but in several spheres and spaces of social life. Intrinsic and extrinsic questions are presented as a challenge to this specific training, involving problems related to encoding knowledge; forms of relation with alterity and more concrete aspects of the scientific practice including access to financial support and the sustainability of lines and training initiatives. Special emphasis is given to the barriers imposed to publishing this kind of research and the challenges that interpose inventivity, rigor, in a scientific mode of production whose pace is increasingly intensified. Conclusion: This analysis highlights a set of challenges arising from contradictions between the nature, the foundations and values of qualitative approach and the hegemonic evaluative model in the academic setting. There are many questions about training in this specific view; spaces for discussion and exchange of experiences are quite limited, not to mention the lack of literature on the subject focused here.
Downloads
References
(1). Amezcua M, Garricondo A. Investigación Cualitativa en España. Análisis de la producción bibliográfica en salud. Em: Mercado FJ, Gastaldo D, Calderon C. Paradigmas y diseños de la Investigación Cualitativa en salud. Una antología Iberoamericana. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara / Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, 2002. pp. 120-132.
(2). Nigenda G, Langer A. Métodos Cualitativos en la Investigación en Salud. Situación Actual y Perspectivas. Em: Mercado FJ, Gastaldo D, Calderón C. Paradigmas y Diseños de La Investigación Cualitativa em Salud. Guadalajara: Ed. Universidade de Guadalajara, 2002:91-208.
(3). Bosi MLM, Martínez, FJM. Organizadores. Pesquisa Qualitativa de Serviços de Saúde. Petrópolis-RJ: Editora Vozes, 2004.
(4). Morin E. Introdução ao Pensamento Complexo. 3ªed. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2007.
(5). Bosi, Maria Lúcia Magalhães. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde coletiva: panorama e desafios. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva,17(3): 575-586, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300002
(6). Bourdieu P. O campo científico. Em: Ortiz R, Organizador. Pierre Bourdieu. São Paulo: Ática, 2003.
(7). Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Aprroaches. Londres: Sage, 1994.
(8). Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Londres: Sage, 2002.
(9). Tesch R. Qualitative Research. Analysis types & software tools. Nova Iorque: The Falmer Press, 1995.
(10). Bosi MLM, Prado SD. O Campo da Alimentação e Nutrição em Saúde Coletiva: constituição, contornos e estatuto científico. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva (Impresso), v. 16, pp. 7-17, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000100002
(11). Nunes ED. Saúde coletiva: uma história recente de um passado remoto. Em: Campos GWS, Minayo MCS, Akerman M, Drumond Jr M, Carvalho YM. Tratado de Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo: Hucitec; Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Fiocruz. pp. 295-315, 2009.
(12). Paim JS. Desafios para a saúde coletiva no século XXI. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788523211776
(13). Campos GWS. Saúde pública e saúde coletiva: campo e núcleo de saberes e práticas. Ciênc. saúde coletiva. 5(2): 219-230, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232000000200002
(14). Lima NT, Santana JP. Saúde Coletiva como compromisso. A trajetória da ABRASCO. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Fiocruz/ABRASCO, 2006.
(15). Weber Max. A Ciência como vocação. Em: Weber, M. Ensaios de Sociologia, RJ: Ed Guanabara, 1982.
(16). Luz MT. Prometeu acorrentado: análise sociológica da categoria produtividade e as condições atuais da vida acadêmica. Physis, 15(1): 39-57, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312005000100003
(17). Buber M. Do diálogo e do dialógico. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2009.
(18). Canguilhemn G. O Normal e o patológico. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 1990.
(19). Morin E. A cabeça bem feita. 9ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand do Brasil, 2004.
(20). Bauman Z. Vida para Consumo: A transformação das pessoas em mercadoria. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2008.
(21). Uchimura KY, Bosi MLM. Qualidade e Subjetividade na Avaliação de Programas e Serviços de Saúde (Medline). Cadernos de Saúde Pública (FIOCRUZ), Rio de janeiro, 18(6): 1561-1569, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2002000600009
(22). Bosi MLM, Uchimura KY. Avaliação da Qualidade ou Avaliação Qualitativa da Atenção? Elementos para uma demarcação conceitual. Revista de Saúde Pública/Journal of Public Health, 41:150-153, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000100020
(23). Mercado FJ, Lizardi A, Villasenor M. Investigación Cualitativa en Salud em America Latina. Uma aproximación. Em: Mercado FJ, Gastaldo D, Calderón C. Paradigmas y Diseños de la Investigación Cualitativa en Salud. Guadalajara: Ed. Universidade de Guadalajara, 2002: 133-1580.
(24). Conde F. Encuentros y desencuentros entre la perspectiva cualitativa y la cuantitativa en la historia de la medicina. Revista Esp Salud Publica, 76(5), septiembre/octubre, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57272002000500003
(25). Abusabha R, Woelfel ML. Qualitative vs quantitative methods: two opposites that make a perfect match. J Am Diet Assoc. 103(5): 566-569, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jada.2003.50129
(26). Bosi MLM, Martínez, FJM. Organizadores. Avaliação Qualitativa de Programas de Saúde. Petrópolis-RJ: Editora Vozes, 2006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
