Alvan Feinstein’s Science of Clinical Judgment: A Solution to the Gaps between Research and Clinical Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.227Keywords:
Clinical Epidemiology, Clinical Reasoning, Evidence-Based Medicine, Medical EthicsAbstract
Following the Second World War, a prominent professional challenge in medicine, highlighted by practitioners, has been the divide between research and clinical practice. Medical authority was rooted in specific conditions of professional autonomy. Yet, there was a prevailing notion that medical decisions were scientifically elusive due to their reliance on data acquired and analyzed by individuals. While laboratory research epitomized scientific order and rigor, clinical practice was entrenched in a tradition that endowed practitioners with undue authority. Much of Alvan Feinstein’s post-war research and academic contributions in the American context became pivotal both in the development of a science of clinical judgment and in the endeavor to bridge the gap between clinical practice and research. This paper underscores certain facets of his proposal. This approach is of interest to healthcare professionals as it champions the humanistic foundations of the classical concept of Clinical Judgment, whilst also advocating for modern scientific rationalism. It emphasizes training the physician’s perceptual machinery to enhance observation mechanisms and the accurate categorization of patients.
Downloads
References
(1) Chin-Yee B, Upshur R. Clinical judgement in the era of big data and predictive analytics. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2018;24(3):638–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12852
(2) Engelhardt T. Introduction. En: Engelhardt T, Spicker S, Towers B (eds). Clinical judgment: a critical appraisal. Proceedings of the fifth trans-disciplinary symposium on philosophy and medicine held at los angeles, california, april 14-16, 1977. London: Reidel Publishing Company; 1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0
(3) Armstrong D. Clinical sense and clinical science. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 1977;11(11–13):599–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90041-5
(4) Weisz G, Cambrosio A, Keating P, Knaapen L, Schlich T, Tournay VJ. The Emergence of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Milbank Q [Internet]. 2007;85(4):691–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00505.x
(5) Guyatt G. (1992). Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA, 268(17), 2420. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
(6) Gordon DR. Clinical Science and Clinical Expertise: Changing Boundaries between Art and Science in Medicine. In: Lock M, Gordon D (eds). Biomedicine Examined. Springer Netherlands: 1988. p. 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2725-4_11
(7) Weisz G. From clinical counting to evidence based medicine. In: Forland G, Oppinel A, Weisz G (eds). Medical quantification in historical & sociological perspectives. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2005.
(8) Davidoff F., Haynes, B., Sackett, D., & Smith, R. (1995). Evidence based medicine. BMJ, 310(6987), 1085–1086. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1085
(9) Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn”t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
(10) Montori, V. M., & Guyatt, G. H. (2002). What is evidence-based medicine? Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 31(3), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8529(02)00015-4
(11) Estrada-Mesa DA. Database on Evidence-Based Medicine and Studies from the Social Sciences, Medical Humanities, and Philosophy of Medicine [Internet]. Mendeley Data, vol. 1; 2023. https://doi.org/10.17632/3h8yhk2gkk.1
(12) Tonelli MR. The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med [Internet]. 1998;73(12):1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199812000-00011
(13) Macnaughton RJ. Evidence and clinical judgement. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 1998;4(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.00002.x
(14) Horwitz RI. The dark side of evidence-based medicine. Cleve Clin J Med [Internet]. 1996;63(6):320–323. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8917983/
(15) Boussageon R. L'evidence based medicine (ebm) et la légitimité du pouvoir de guérir. La revue Lato Sensu [Internet], 2011;266(HS):33-46. https://doi.org/10.3917/retm.266.0033
(16) Frankford DM. Scientism and Economism in the Regulation of Health Care. J Health Polit Policy Law [Internet]. 1994;19(4);773–799. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-19-4-773
(17) Carr-Hill R. Welcome? To the brave new world of evidence based medicine. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 1995;41(11):1467–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00351-7
(18) Grahame-Smith D. Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissent. BMJ [Internet]. 1995;310(6987):1126–1127. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1126
(19) Hurwitz B. Clinical guidelines and the law. Negligence, discretion and the judgment. London: CRC Press; 1996.
(20) Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ [Internet]. 2014;348:g3725–g3725. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725
(21) Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP J Club [Internet]. 2002;136(2):A11-4. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11874303/
(22) Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet [Internet]. 2017;390(10092):415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6
(23) Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Progress in Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA [Internet]. 2008;300(15):1814-16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.15.1814
(24) Timmermans S, Berg M. The gold standard: the challenge of evidence based medicine and standardization in healthcare. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2003.
(25) Haynes RB. What kind of evidence is it that Evidence-Based Medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2002;2(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-3
(26) Elstein AS. Clinical Judgment: Psychological Research and Medical Practice. Science [Internet]. 1976;194(4266):696–700. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.982034
(27) Chin-Yee B, Fuller J. Clinical judgement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2018;24(3):635–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12931
(28) Giroux É. Médecine de précision et Evidence-Based Medicine : quelle articulation ? La revue Lato Sensu [Internet]. 2017;4(2):49–65. https://doi.org/10.20416/lsrsps.v4i2.683
(29) Knaapen L. Being “evidence-based” in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development. Soc Stud Sci [Internet]. 2013;43(5): 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713483679
(30) Anjum R. Evidence-based or person-centered? An ontological debate. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc [Internet]. 2016;4(2):421-429. https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v4i2.1152
(31) Hanemaayer A. Evidence-Based Medicine: A Genealogy of the Dominant Science of Medical Education. J Med Humanit [Internet]. 2016;37(4):449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9398-0
(32) Feinstein AR. Clinical Judgment Revisited: The Distraction of Quantitative Models. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 1994;120(9):799. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-9-199405010-00012
(33) Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the “Evidence” of “Evidence-Based Medicine.” AJM [Internet]. 1997;103(6):529–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00244-1
(34) Vandenbroucke JP. Clinical investigation in the 20th century: the ascendancy of numerical reasoning. Lancet [Internet]. 1998;352(Suppl 2):S12–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)90293-8
(35) Timmermans S, Kolker ES. Evidence-based medicine and the reconfiguration of medical knowledge. J Health Soc Behav [Internet]. 2004;Suppl 45:177–193. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15779473/
(36) Berg M. Turning a Practice into a Science: Reconceptualizing Postwar Medical Practice. Soc Stud Science [Internet]. 1995;25(3):437–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025003002
(37) Feinstein A. Clinical judgment. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company; 1967.
(38) Paul JR. President´s Address Clinical Epidemiology 1. JCI [Internet]. 1938;17(5):539–541. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI100978
(39) Giroux É. De l”épidémiologie de santé publique à l”épidémiologie clinique. Quelques réflexions sur la relation entre épidémiologie et clinique (1920-1980). Bulletin d”histoire et d”épistémologie Des Sciences de La Vie [Internet]. 2012;19(1):21–43. https://doi.org/10.3917/bhesv.191.0021
(40) Meehl P. Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1954
(41) Feinstein AR. Clinical Epidemiology. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 1968;69(4):807. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-69-4-807
(42) Braude HD. Clinical intuition versus statistics: different modes of tacit knowledge in clinical epidemiology and evidence-based medicine. Theor Med Bioeth [Internet]. 2009;30(3):181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9106-4
(43) Fava GA. Evidence-based medicine was bound to fail: a report to Alvan Feinstein. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2017;84:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.012
(44) Timmermans S. From Autonomy to Accountability: the role of clinical practice guidelines in professional power. Perspect Biol Med [Internet]. 2005;48(4):490–501. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2005.0096
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Iatreia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Papers published in the journal are available for use under the Creative Commons license, specifically Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
The papers must be unpublished and sent exclusively to the Journal Iatreia; the author uploading the contribution is required to submit two fully completed formats: article submission and authorship responsibility.
