Lectura colaborativa de tablas de frecuencias: análisis secuencial del proceso sociocognitivo

Mariano Castellaro; Néstor Roselli

doi:10.17533/udea.rp.e346667

Authors

Mariano Castellaro Rosario Institute of Research in Educational Sciences
Néstor Roselli Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e346667

Keywords:

peer interaction, peer collaboration, tables, cultural systems, comprehension

Abstract

The work is part of a general research program whose purpose is to transfer the study of interaction between peers to the field of appropriation of different external systems of representation. Thus, in this scientific and technological research article, the socio-cognitive process involved in the collaborative understanding of a cross table of frequencies (in dyads) is analyzed from a sequential perspective. Three phases were differentiated: initial positioning against the slogan, elaboration and final decision making. 120 dyads (240 students) from 6th and 7th grade, from the city of Rosario and surroundings (Argentina) participated. The main differences referred to the time of preparation. In general, the agreement prevailed over the conflict, without justification; when substantiated modalities were recorded, unilateral ones predominated; in cases of conflict, its relational resolution prevailed. These tendencies were accentuated or weakened according to lesser or greater difficulty of the item. The socio-cognitive composition also registered significant differences in the elaboration and resolution phases, opposing advanced symmetrical dyads, with respect to the basic symmetrical and asymmetrical ones. The results agree with the postulates of the socio cognitive conflict theory and the levels of comprehension reported by the literature are corroborated.

|Abstract

= 238 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 185 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mariano Castellaro, Rosario Institute of Research in Educational Sciences

Doctor of Psychology. Researcher at the Rosario Institute of Research in Educational Sciences (IRICE-CONICET-UNR).

Néstor Roselli, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina

Doctor of Psychology. Researcher at the Center of Research in Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina (UCA).

References

Andersen, C., Scheuer, N., Pérez, M., & Teubal, E. (2017). Representational Systems and Practices as Learning Tools. Neterhlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087905286

Arterberry, M., Cain, K., & Chopko, S. (2007). Collaborative Problem Solving in Five-Year-Old Children: Evidence of Social Facilitation and Social Loafing. Educational Psychology, 27(5), 577-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701308755

Asterhan, C., Schwarz, B., & Cohen-Eliyahu, N. (2014). Outcome feedback during collaborative learning: Contingencies between feedback and dyad composition. Learning and Instruction, 34, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.003

Butera, F.; Sommet, N. & Darnon, C. (2019). Sociocognitive conflict regulation: How to make sense of diverging ideas. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418813986

Castellaro, M. & Peralta, N. (2020). Pensar el conocimiento escolar desde el socioconstructivismo: interacción, construcción y contexto. Perfiles educativos, 42(168), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.168.59439

Castellaro, M.; Peralta, N. & Curcio, J. M. (2020a). Estudio secuencial de la interacción sociocognitiva durante la resolución de problemas lógicos. Revista CES Psicología, 13(1), 1-17. https://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/4992

Castellaro, M., Peralta, N., Tuzinkievicz, M. A., & Curcio, J. M. (2020b). La argumentación dialógica durante la resolución colaborativa de problemas lógicos, en díadas de quinto y sexto grado. Traslaciones, 7(14), 102-122.

https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/traslaciones/article/view/4251

Castellaro, M., & Roselli, N. (2015). Peer collaboration in children according to age, socioeconomic context and task. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0228-3

Castellaro, M., & Roselli, N. (2018). Interacción sociocognitiva entre pares en situaciones simétricas y asimétricas de competencia epistémica. Revista de Psicología, 36(1), 333-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/psico.201801.011

Castellaro, M. & Roselli, N. (2019). Simetría-asimetría cognitiva y afinidad socioafectiva en la comprensión colaborativa de tablas de frecuencias. Liberabit, 25(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n2.06

Castellaro, M. & Roselli, N. (2020). Comprensión individual y diádica de tablas de frecuencias en alumnos de escolaridad primaria. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI18-1.cidt

Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

Fawcett, L., & Garton, A. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X23411

Friel, S., Curcio, F., & Bright, G. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671

Gabucio, F., Martí, E., Enfedaque, J., Gilabert, S., & Konstantinidou, A. (2010). Niveles de comprensión de las tablas en alumnos de primaria y secundaria. Cultura y Educación, 22(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564010791304528

García-Mila, M., Marti, E., Gilabert, S., & Castells, M. (2014). Fifth through Eighth grade students’ difficulties in constructing bar graphs: Data organization, data aggregation, and integration of a second variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(3), 201-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.921132

Gariboldi, M. B., & Salsa, A. (2018). Conocimientos sobre los aspectos formales y referenciales del dibujo, la escritura y los numerales en la lectura compartida entre madres y niños pequeños. Interdisciplinaria, 35(2), 477-494.

Gariboldi, M. B., & Salsa, A. (2019). Conocimientos sobre dibujo, escritura y numerales en la producción gráfica materno-infantil, Argentina. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 17(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.17204

Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially Shared Metacognition of Dyads of Pupils in Collaborative Mathematical Problem-Solving Processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002

Maita, M., Mareovich F., & Peralta, O. (2014). Intentional teaching facilitates young children's comprehension and use of a symbolic object. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 175(5), 401-415. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2014.941320

Marti, E. (2017). Tables as cognitive tools in primary education. En C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. Pérez y E. Teubal (Eds.), Representational Systems and Practices as Learning Tools (pp. 133-148). Neterhlands: Sense Publishers.

Martí, E., Scheuer, N., Cavalcante, S., Trench, M., & Brizuela, B. M. (2016). Symbolic representation of the number three: a study with three-year-old children from contrasting socioeconomic environments. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 743-755. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1188821

Mejía-Arauz, R., Rogoff, B., Dayton, A., & Henne-Ochoa, R. (2018). Collaboration or Negotiation: Two Ways of Interacting Suggest How Shared Thinking Develops. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.017

Miell, D., & McDonald, R. (2000). Children`s creative collaborations: the importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00130

Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1983), La Construcción Social de la Inteligencia. México: Trillas.

Ogden, L. (2000). Collaborative tasks, collaborative children: An analysis of reciprocity during peer interaction at Key Stage 1. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920050000953

Peralta, N. & Roselli, N. (2016). Conflicto sociocognitivo e intersubjetividad: Análisis de las interacciones verbales en situaciones de aprendizaje colaborativo. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 6(1), 90-113. Recuperado de https://revista.psico.edu.uy/index.php/revpsicologia/article/view/313

Peralta, N., & Roselli, N. (2017). Modalidad argumentativa en función del tipo de tarea y tamaño del grupo. Cogency, 9(2), 67-83. http://cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/295

Peralta, N., & Roselli, N. (2021). Efectos de la regulación de la interacción diádica en tareas argumentativas. Revista de Psicología, 39(1), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202101.009

Peralta, O., Salsa, A., Maita, M. R., & Mareovich, F. (2013). Scaffolding Young Children's Understanding of Symbolic Objects. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 33(3), 266-274. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2012.732042

Pérez-Echeverría, M. P., Postigo, Y. & Marín, C. (2010). Las habilidades gráficas de los estudiantes universitarios: ¿cómo comprenden las gráficas los estudiantes de psicología? Cultura y Educación, 22(2), 215-229. doi: 10.1174/113564010791304537

Pérez, M., Postigo, Y., & Marín, C. (2018). Understanding of graphs in social science undergraduate students: selection and interpretation of graphs. Irish Educational Studies, 37(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1440248

Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1984). La Construcción de la Inteligencia en la Interacción Social. Aprendiendo con los compañeros. Madrid: Visor.

Postigo, Y., & López, A. (2015). Alfabetización gráfica en libros de texto de biología: análisis de las actividades con imágenes. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38(3), 509-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1054667

Pozo, J. I. (2017). Aprender más allá del cuerpo: De las representaciones encarnadas a la explicitación mediada por representaciones externas. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 40(2), 219-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.1306942

Psaltis, C., & Duveen, G. (2007). Conservation and conversation types: Forms of recognition and cognitive development. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X91415

Psaltis, C., Duveen, G., & Perret-Clermont, A. (2009). The Social and the Psychological: Structure and Context in Intellectual Development. Human Development, 52(5), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1159/000233261

Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., & Butera, F. (2014). Psychologie sociale de la connaissance. Presses universitaires de Grenoble: Grenoble.

Rodríguez, J., Martí, E., & Salsa, A. (2018). Symbolic representations and cardinal knowledge in 3- and 4-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.004.

Rodríguez, J., & Salsa, A. (2020). Representación bimodal de valores cardinales en la comprensión de los primeros números. Psykhe, 29(2), 1 – 14. https://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.29.2.1539

Rojas Drummond, S., Albarrán, C. & Littleton, K. (2008). Collaboration, creativity and the co-construction of oral and written texts. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 177-191. doi:10.1348/026151005X91415.

Rojas-Drummond, S., Mazón, N., Fernández, M., & Wegerif, R. (2006). Explicit reasoning, creativity and co-construction in primary school children's collaborative activities. Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.001

Roselli, N. & Cardoni, J. (2020). Mapas conceptuales vs. Resúmenes: diferencias en las modalidades de construcción colaborativa. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8(3), e249. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n3.429

Salsa, A., & Gariboldi, M. B. (2017). Experiencia con símbolos y comprensión de dibujos en niños pequeños de distintos contextos socioeconómicos. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 36(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.4332

Salsa, A., & Vivaldi, R. (2017). Developmental changes in early comprehension and production of drawings: Evidence from two socioeconomic backgrounds. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(4), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2017.1328385

Salsa, A., Gariboldi, M. B., Vivaldi, R., & Rodríguez, J. (2019). Geometric maps as tools for different purposes in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 33 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.004

Schmitz, M., & Winskel, H. (2008). Towards effective partnerships in a collaborative problem-solving task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 581-596. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X281619

Wegerif, R., Fujita, T., Doney, J., Pérez Linares, J., Andrews, R., & Rhyn, C. (2016). Developing and trialing a measure of group thinking. Learning and Instruction, 48, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.08.001

Yang, Y. (2016). Lessons learnt from contextualizing a UK teaching thinking program in a conventional Chinese classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.002

Zapiti, A., & Psaltis, C. (2012). Asymmetries in peer interaction: The effect of social representations of gender and knowledge asymmetry on children´s cognitive development. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 578-588. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1885

Zapiti, A., & Psaltis, C. (2019). Too good to be true? Towards an understanding of the Zone of Proximal development (ZPD) dynamics from a Piagetian perspective: Gender composition and its changing role from early to middle childhood. Psihologija, Online First. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI181023006Z