Comparison of body composition assessment by bioimpedance versus hydrodensitometry in women 38 to 60 years old from Medellin-Colombia

Authors

  • Juan C. Aristizábal Universidad de Antioquia
  • Sara M. Olaya Ramírez Universidad de Antioquia
  • Argenis Giraldo Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.penh.v17n2a04

Keywords:

Body composition, anthropometry, fat body, hydrodensitometry, bioelectrical impedance.

Abstract

Background: Body composition assessment by bioimpedance is non-invasive, inexpensive and portable. Objective: To assess the validity of bioimpedance to estimate fat mass percentage (%FM) in women. Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional study with a sample of 50 women, 38 to 60 years old. Hydrodensitometry with simultaneous measurement of the lung residual volume was used as the reference method. The %FM was assessed by the bioimpedance hand-to-feet technique using the equations of Sun and Kotler. A Tanita body composition scale was used to estimate the %FM with the bioimpedance feet-to-feet technique. Results: The %FM estimated by Sun (34,0±4,8) and Kotler (34,4±6,0) were not different (p>0,05) from the %FM obtained by hydrodensitometry (33,3±5,6). The %FM estimated by Tanita differed from the reference method (30,1±5,8, p=0,000). BIA equations and Tanita showed low agreement with hydrodensitometry: Sun (Bland-Altman: -0,73 CI95%: -9,9; 8,4), Kotler (Bland-Altman: -1,1 CI95%: -10,7; 8,5) and Tanita (Bland-Altman: 3,2 CI95%: -5,8; 12,2). Conclusions: In this specific population of women, hand-to-feet bioimpedance with Sun and Kotler equations accurately estimated the %FM of the whole group, but these equations lacked validity to assess the individual %FM. The Tanita body composition scale lacked validity to assess both; individual and group %FM.

|Abstract
= 355 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 245 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 315 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juan C. Aristizábal, Universidad de Antioquia

Doctorate in Nutritional Sciences. Lic. Physical Education-Nutritionist Dietitian. Research Group in Physiology and Biochemistry (PHYSIS), Faculty of Medicine.

Sara M. Olaya Ramírez, Universidad de Antioquia

Dietitian Nutritionist

Argenis Giraldo, Universidad de Antioquia

Master of Science in Food and Human Nutrition. Dietitian Nutritionist. School of Nutrition and Dietetics.

References

Huxley R, Mendis S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist: hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk: a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:16-22. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.68.

Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar, Profamilia, Instituto Nacional de salud, Universidad de Antioquia. Encuesta nacional de la situación nutricional en Colombia: 2005. Bogotá: ICBF; 2006.

Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar, Ministerio de la Protección Social, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Profamilia. Encuesta nacional de la situación nutricional en Colombia 2010. Bogotá: ICBF; 2011. 512 p

Mulasi U, Kuchnia AJ, Cole AJ, Earthman CP. Bioimpedance at the bedside: current applications, limitations, and opportunities. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30:180-93. doi: 10.1177/0884533614568155.

Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD. Bioelectrical impedance analysis, part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1226-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004.

Lukaski HC. Evolution of bioimpedance: a circuitous journey from estimation of physiological function to assessment of body composition and a return to clinical research. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(Suppl 1):S2-9. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.149.

Sun SS, Chumlea WC, Heymsfield SB. Development of bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equations for body composition with the use of a multicomponent model for use in epidemiologic surveys. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:331-40.

Kotler DP, Burastero S, Wang J, Pierson RN. Prediction of body cell mass, fat-free mass, and total body water with bioelectrical impedance analysis: effects of race, sex, and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(Suppl 3):489S-97S.

Caicedo-Eraso J, González-Correa C, González-Correa C. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equations validation against hydrodensitometry in a Colombian population. J Phys Conf Ser. 2013;(434):1-4. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/434/1/012065.

Aristizabal J, Restrepo M. Validez de la bioimpedancia para estimar la composición corporal de mujeres entre los 18 y 40 años. Perspect Nutr Humana. 2014;16:52-60.

Cornier MA, Després JP, Davis N. Assessing adiposity: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 124: 1996-2019. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318233bc6a.

Lohman T, Roche A, Martorell R. Antropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1988. p. 2-80.

Going S. Densitometry In: Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG. Human body composition. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1996. p. 3-22.

Cyprus body composition analysis: Appendix B: Testing your BIA instrument. Clinton Township: RJL Systems R; 2012.

Tanita. Understanding BIA technology: Tanita body composition analyser. Arlington Heights. Technical notes N°5.

WHO. Obesity and overweight. Geneva; 2015. [citado agosto de 2015] Fact sheet N°311. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-10.

Lazzer S, Boirie Y, Meyer M, Vermorel M. Evaluation of two foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysers to assess body composition in overweight and obese adolescents. Br J Nutr. 2003;90:987-92.

Aglago KE, Menchawy IE, Kari KE. Development and validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis equations for predicting total body water and fat-free mass in North-African adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:1081-6. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.125.

Pateyjohns I, Brinkworth G, Buckley J, Noakes M, Clifton P. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. Obesity 2006;14:2064-70.

Thomson R, Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Clifton PM. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women. Clin Nutr. 2007;26:771-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003.

Lohman TG. Advances in body composition assessment. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1992. p. 1-5.

Aleman-Mateo H, Rush E, Esparza-Romero J. Prediction of fat-free mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis in older adults from developing countries: a cross-validation study using the deuterium dilution method. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14:418-26.

Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Schouten FJ. Validity of total and segmental impedance measurements for prediction of body composition across ethnic population groups. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:214-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601303.

Haroun D, Taylor SJ, Viner RM. Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in adolescents across different ethnic groups. Obesity. 2010;18:1252-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.344.

Elia M. Body composition by whole-body bioelectrical impedance and prediction of clinically relevant outcomes: overvalued or underused? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(Suppl 1):S60-70. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.166.

Ellis KJ. Selected body composition methods can be used in field studies. J Nutr. 2001;131:1589S-95S.

Marrodán SM, Mesa MS, Cabañas MD, Gonzalez Montero M, Pacheco JL. Técnicas analíticas en el estudio de la composición corporal. Antropometría frente a sistemas de bioimpedancia bipolar y tetrapolar. Nutr Clin Diet Hosp. 2007;27:11-9.

Pietrobelli A, Rubiano F, St-Onge MP, Heymsfield SB. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:1479-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601993.

Published

2016-07-28

How to Cite

Aristizábal, J. C., Olaya Ramírez, S. M., & Giraldo, A. (2016). Comparison of body composition assessment by bioimpedance versus hydrodensitometry in women 38 to 60 years old from Medellin-Colombia. Perspectivas En Nutrición Humana, 17(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.penh.v17n2a04

Issue

Section

Research