Education for health: perspectives and experiences in higher education in health sciences, Medellín, Colombia

Authors

  • Paula A. Díaz University of Antioquia
  • Fernando Peñaranda University of Antioquia
  • Sergio Cristancho University of Antioquia
  • Nydia Caicedo University of Antioquia
  • Marcela Garcés University of Antioquia
  • Teresita Alzate University of Antioquia
  • Tomás Bernal University of Antioquia
  • Margarita M. Gómez University of Antioquia
  • Águeda L. Valencia University of Antioquia
  • Sol N. Gómez University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.5202

Keywords:

health education, qualitative research, higher education, health professions (health sciences), curriculum

Abstract

Objectives: to know the current panorama of education fo health (EFH) in some institutions of higher education that train health professionals in Medellín, Colombia, and furthermore, to promote academic discussions among professionals who are interested in EFH. Methodology: a qualitative research based on a multiple case study was conducted taking into account the specific cases of some higher education programs in health sciences in Medellín. Ethnographic techniques including individual and group interviews were utilized. Results: EFH is currently facing quite a contradictory situation: first of all, its importance is highlighted but on the other hand, evidences suggest a limited development. Moreover, the EFH has an overlapping identity as it is mistaken for other fields, disciplines, programs and some other different kinds of health activities. A tension between conceptions of EFH aimed to behavior change based on traditional pedagogical models and other alternative points of view more focused in human development is identified. An uneven curriculum development was also found when different institutions were compared. Finally, poor research development was pointed out in EFH. Conclusions: EFH represents an important dimension of public health which becomes contradictory with the incipient development of this field and the prevailing traditional models of EFH as it is evidenced in this research. A predominant biomedical model focused in morbidity which is primarily present in the educational programs training health professionals and a poorly developed pedagogical approach in this field support the understanding of these findings.
|Abstract
= 900 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 262 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Paula A. Díaz, University of Antioquia

Medical, Mag. in Epidemiology, Esp. in Health Promotion. Epidemiology Group, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Fernando Peñaranda, University of Antioquia

Physician, PhD in Social Sciences, Childhood and Youth, Mg. in Public Health, Mg in Educational and Social Development. Professor National School of Public Health, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Sergio Cristancho, University of Antioquia

Psychologist, PhD Cultural Psychology, Mg. Cultural Psychology. Professor at the National School of Public Health, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Nydia Caicedo, University of Antioquia

Nutritionist, Mg in Epidemiology. Member of NACER Group, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Marcela Garcés, University of Antioquia

Medical, Mag. in Public Health. Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Teresita Alzate, University of Antioquia

Nutritionist, PhD candidate in Education: Pedagogical Actions and Community Development, Mg. in education. Professor School of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Tomás Bernal, University of Antioquia

Dentist, Mag. in Social and Human Sciences, Esp. Government, Culture and Politics, Esp. Management of Social Development. Professor Faculty of Dentistry, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.

Margarita M. Gómez, University of Antioquia

Communicator, Mag. Collective Health. Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Águeda L. Valencia, University of Antioquia

Nurse, Mag. Collective Health. Professor Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Antioquia. Professor at the Faculty of Medicine, San Martín University Foundation. Medellin Colombia.

Sol N. Gómez, University of Antioquia

Psychologist, Mag. Human development. Professor at the Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Antioquia, Professor at the Faculty of Medicine, San Martín University Foundation. Medellin Colombia.

References

(1). Serrano MI. Educación para la salud y participación comunitaria. Díaz de Santos, editor. Madrid; 1990.

(2). Peñaranda F, Bastidas M, Escobar G, Torres JN, Arango A. Análisis integral de las prácticas pedagógicas de un programa educativo en Colombia. Salud Pública de México 2006;48(3):229-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342006000300007

(3). Bourdieu P, Passeron JC. La reproducción. Elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. 3ª ed. México D.F: Laia S.A; 1998.

(4). Lolas F. Más allá del cuerpo. La construcción narrativa de la salud. Santiago de Chile: Bello A; 1997.

(5). Peñaranda F. Hacia una comprensión de la construcción de significados sobre la crianza del programa crecimiento y desarrollo. [Tesis Doctoral]. Manizales: Convenio Universidad de Manizales y Centro Internacional de Educación y Desarrollo Humano; 2006.

(6). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Carta de Ottawa. En: Organi-zación Mundial de la Salud, editor. Primera conferencia internacional de promoción del la salud. Ontario: oms; 1986.

(7). Franco S, Ochoa D, Hernández M. La promoción de la salud y la seguridad social. Bogotá: Corporación Salud y Desarrollo; 1995.

(8). Whitehead D. A social cognitive model for health education/health promotion practice. Journal of Advances in Nursing. 2001;36:417-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01973.x

(9). Alzate YT. Desde la educación para la salud hacia la pedagogía de la educación alimentaria y nutricional. Perspectivas en Nutrición Humana (Medellín). 2006; No. 16, Jul-Dic:21-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.penh.17866

(10). Stake RE. Case Studies. En: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Hand-book of Qualitative Research. 2 ed; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publi-cations; 2000. p. 435-454.

(11). Stake R. Case studies. En: Denzin N, LinconY, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 236-47.

(12). Geertz C. Descripción densa: hacia una teoría interpretativa de la cultura. En: Bohannan P, M G, editors. Antropología: lecturas. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 1993.

(13). Galeano ME. Estrategias de investigación social cualitativa. El giro de la mirada. Medellín: La Carreta; 2004.

(14). Apple MW. Ideología y currículo. Madrid: Akal; 1986.

(15). Torres SJ. El curriculum oculto. 8 ed. Madrid: Ediciones Morata; 2005.

(16). Fee E, Brown TM. Public Health at the Crossroads: Winslow, C.-E.A. Voices from the past. Am J Public Health 1999;89(11):1645-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.11.1645

(17). Terris M. The contributions of Henty E. Sigerist to health service organization. J Public Health Policy 1995;16(2):152-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3342591

(18). Leavell H, Clark G. Preventive medicine for the doctor in community: epidemiologic approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1953.

(19). Conferencia Internacional de Atención Primaria de Salud 1978; Alma-Ata, urss; 1978.

(20). Ministerio de la Protección Social de Colombia. Decreto 3039 de 2007; por el cual se adopta el Plan Nacional de Salud Pública 2007-2010. Bogotá: El Ministerio; 2007. p. 33-46.

(21). Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Resolución 412 de 2000; por la cual se establecen las actividades, procedimientos e intervenciones de demanda inducida y obligatorio cumplimiento y se adoptan las normas técnicas y guías de atención para el desarrollo de las acciones de protección específica y detección temprana y la atención de enfermedades de interés en salud pública. Bogotá: El Ministerio; 2000.

(22). República de Colombia. Ley 100 de 1993 de Colombia; por la cual se crea el sistema de seguridad social integral y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Congreso; 1993.

(23). Arroyo HV, editor. Promoción de la salud y educación para la salud: paradigma integrador o el debate histórico de la inclusión o la exclusión. En: IV Conferencia Conferencia Latinoamericana de Promoción de la Salud y Educación para la Salud UIPES/ORLA 4-7 Noviembre de 2009; 2009; Medellín: UIPES, Faculatad Na-cional de Salud Pública Universidad de Antioquia; 2009.

(24). Foucault M. Historia de la medicalización. Educación Médica y Salud 1977;11(1):3-25.

(25). Achard P. Discurso biológico y orden social: crítica de las teorías biologistas. Psicología y ciencias sociales. México: Editorial Nue-va Imagen; 1980.

(26). Robinson S & Hill. Our healthier hospital? The challenge for nursing. Journal of Nursing Management 1999;7: 7-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2834.1999.00972.x

(27). Breilh J. Epidemiología crítica. Ciencia emancipadora e interculturalidad. Buenos Aires: Lugar editorial; 2003.

Published

2011-01-29

How to Cite

1.
Díaz PA, Peñaranda F, Cristancho S, Caicedo N, Garcés M, Alzate T, Bernal T, Gómez MM, Valencia Águeda L, Gómez SN. Education for health: perspectives and experiences in higher education in health sciences, Medellín, Colombia. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2011 Jan. 29 [cited 2025 Feb. 5];28(3):221-30. Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/5202

Issue

Section

Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)