Generalization and Inference: An Understanding Based on Three Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.15009Keywords:
inference, generalization, research, public healthAbstract
This paper is a reflection which seeks to stimulate discussion and debate concerning the different meanings that the concepts of generalization and inference can take on, based on the approach or perspective that is being employed. For this purpose the importance and usage which has been accorded to these concepts within the field of classic-modern epidemiology is taken into consideration, especially in order to define internal and external validity issues and to formulate hypotheses. Next the main arguments are presented and are defended by Clifford Geertz from his epistemological perspective of interpretive ethnography and based on his theoretical conception of culture. Subsequently the ideas maintained by Juan Samaja are presented from his epistemological and methodological approach for research into health, advocating primarily for abductive reasoning, and not simply inductive and deductive, which have until now been privileged in logic studies. Finally a discussion and conclusions are presented, highlighting that from these three perspectives public health has the opportunity to expand its new knowledge generation processes and to better understand the conditions for good collective health and wellbeing.
Downloads
References
(1). Geertz C. Descripción densa: hacia una teoría interpretativa de la cultura. En: Bohannan P, Glazer M, editores. Antropología: lecturas. 2a ed. Madrid: McGraw Hill; 1993. p. 547-68.
(2). Samaja J. Epistemología y metodología: elementos para una teoría de la investigación científica. 3a ed. Buenos Aires: Eudeba; 2005.
(3). Moliner M. Diccionario del uso del español. Madrid: Gredos; 1966.
(4). Academia Real Española. Diccionario de la lengua española [internet]. [Acceso 13 de Febrero de 2013]. Disponible en: http:// www.rae.es/rae.html.
(5). Génova G. Los tres modos de inferencia [Internet]. [Acceso 13 de Febrero de 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.unav.es/gep/AF/ Genova.html#nota4
(6). Last JM. A Dictionary of epidemiology. 3a ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
(7). Dicker R, Coronado F, Koo D, Gibson Parrish R. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice. 3a ed. Atlanta GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2006.
(8). Breilh J. Epidemiología crítica: ciencia emancipadora e interculturalidad. Argentina: Lugar Editorial; 2003.
(9).Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Harmon RJ, Harmon RJ. Introduction to Inferential Statistics and Hypothesis Testing. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2000; 39(12):1568-1570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200012000-00022
(10). Rothman KJ. Epidemología moderna. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos; 1987.
(11). Bonita R. Types of studies. En: Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström T, editores. Basic Epidemiology. 2a ed. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2006. p. 39-62.
(12). Ruane JM. Essentials of research methods: a guide to social science research. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2005.
(13). Silva Ayçaguer LC. Cultura estadística e investigación científica en el campo de la salud: una mirada crítica. Madrid: Díaz de Santos; 1997.
(14). Doporto L, Roja E, Sapiña J, Millares A. Diccionario enciclopédico U.T.E.H.A. México D. F: Unión Tipográfica Editorial HipanoAmericana; 1964.
(15). Gauderis T, Van de Putte F. Abduction of Generalizations. Theoria [revista en internet] 2012. [Acceso 18 de Septiembre de 2013]; 27(3): 345-363. Disponible en: http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/ THEORIA/article/view/4059/6256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.4059
(16). Haig, Brian D. Scientific method, abduction, and clinical reasoning. J. clin. Psychol. 2008; 64(9): 1013-1018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20505
(17). Reale G, Antíseri D. Historia de la filosofía I. Filosofía pagana antiga. Bogotá: San Pablo; 2007.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Steven Orozco A., Fernando Peñaranda C., Diego A. Restrepo O., Luz M. Mejía O., Samuel A. Arias V.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
