Education in a tension crossed context in the Growth and Development Monitoring Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.283Keywords:
Growth and Development Monitoring Program, health education, health promotion, SIPI, Ley 100 de 1993, Resolución 412 de 2000Abstract
This article presents Colombian health system context-related findings as part of a study intended to understand the educative outcomes and impact of the Growth and Development Monitoring Program (SIPI). In a multiple case study, from an ethnographic perspective, a selected group of children and adults was followed at each institution. Observations took place during initial check-up appointment and the three following ones during the first year. Adults and health team members were interviewed after each session. Findings indicate that several factors have influence on the educative process: diverse scenarios were created by the Law 100, in 1993, representing either an opportunity or a threat for different actors. Health System model-related problems (Law 100, 1993) may also affect education. Incongruence between health promotion and disease prevention was found in the Technical Norm from Resolution 412/2000 and creates tension with SIPI health promotion orientation. Finally, each institution implemented technical norm in a different way. Some actors perceive non proper scenarios for education. So, it is necessary that policy formulation creates conditions to qualify the program and its educative process.
Downloads
References
(1). Ramírez H, Bastidas M, Peñaranda F, Lalinde MI, Eche-verri S, Giraldo Y. Evaluación del proceso de implemen-tación del programa Salud Integral para la Infancia SIPIo Crecimiento y Desarrollo en el municipio de Medellín.Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2002.
(2). Peñaranda F, Bastidas M, Ramírez H, Lalinde M, Giral-do Y, Echeverri S. El programa de crecimiento y desarrollo: otro factor de inequidad en el sistema de salud. RevFac Nac Salud Pública 2000;20:89-99.
(3). Peñaranda F, Bastidas M, Escobar G, Torres N, ArangoA. Efectos e impacto del Programa de Crecimiento y Desarrollo en cuatro instituciones prestadoras de servi-cios de salud de la ciudad de Medellín. Componenteeducativo. 2002-2005. (En prensa)
(4). Swanson J, Chapman L. Dentro de la caja negra: asuntosteóricos y metodológicos en la realización de una investigación evaluativa con enfoque cualitativo. p. 80-111. En:Morse J, ed. Asuntos críticos en los métodos de investiga-ción cualitativa. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2003.
(5). Lecompte M. Un matrimonio conveniente: diseño deinvestigación cualitativa y estándares para la evaluaciónde programa. www.u.v.es/RELIEVEv1n1.htm. 1995; (Fe-cha de acceso: 12 de marzo del 2005).
(6). Oakley P, Pratt B, Clayton A. Outcomes and impact:Evaluating change in social development. Oxford: Intrac;1998. p. 27-78.
(7). Stake R. Case studies. p. 435-454. En: Denzin N, LincolnY, ed. Handbook of qualitative research. 2.ª Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.
(8). Taylor SJ, Bogdan R La entrevista en profundidad. p. 100-132. En: Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós; 1994.
(9). Coffey A, Atkinson P. Encontrar el sentido a los datoscualitativos. Estrategias complementarias de investigación. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2003.
(10). Lincoln Y, Guba E. Paradigmatic controversies, contra-dictions, and emerging confluences. p. 163-188. En:Denzin N, Lincoln Y, Handbook of qualitative research.2.ª ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.
(11). Davies D, Dodd J. Qualitative research and question ofrigor. Qualitative Health Research 2002;12(2):279-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230201200211
(12). Lalinde M, Vargas J, Gómez L, Beleño A, Botero S,Estrada H et al. Salud integral para la infancia: manualde normas técnicas y administrativas. Medellín: ServicioSeccional de Salud de Antioquia; 1993.
(13). Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 412 de 2000,febrero 25, por la cual se establecen las actividades,procedimientos e intervenciones de demanda inducida y obligatorio cumplimiento y se adoptan las normas técni-cas y guías de atención para las acciones de protección específica y detección temprana y la atención de enfer-medades de interés en salud pública. Bogotá: El Minis-terio; 2000.
(14). Greene W, Simons-Morton B. Educación para la salud.México: McGraw Hill; 1988.
(15). Tones K. Reveille for radicals! The paramount purposeof health education? Health Educ Res 2002;17:1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.1.1
(16). Ziglio E, Hagard S, Griffiths J. Health promotion deve-lopments in Europe: achievements & challenges. HealthPromot Int 2000;15:143-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.2.143
(17). Restrepo H. Conceptos y definiciones. p. 24-33. En:Restrepo H, Málaga H, eds. Promoción de la salud: comoconstruir vida saludable. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Pana-mericana; 2001.
(18). Freire P. Pedagogía del oprimido. Buenos Aires: Edito-rial Siglo XXI; 1972.
(19). Kliksberg B. La situación social de América Latina y susimpactos sobre la familia y la educación: interrogantes ybúsquedas. Educación Hoy 2001;145:9-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61490/eial.v11i2.1000
(20). Franco S. La Promoción de la salud y la seguridad social. Bogotá: Corporación Salud y Desarrollo; 1995.Citado por Montoya S. Educación en salud. En: Funda-mentos de salud pública. Tomo 1. Medellín: CIB, 1997.p. 111-122.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gloria Escobar, Fernando Peñaranda, Miriam Bastidas, Nicolás Torres, Adriana Arango
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
