Evaluating diseaseprevention and healthpromotion: aspects to beconsidered
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.711Keywords:
Health promotion, disease preventionAbstract
Downloads
References
(1). Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueenDV, et al. (eds). Evaluation in health promotion:Principles and perspectives. Geneve: WHO; 2003.
(2). Goodstadt MS, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Po-tvin L, Rootman I, Springett J. Evaluation in heal-th promotion: synthesis and recommendations.WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser 2001;(92):517-533.
(3). Thompson JC. Program evaluation within a heal-th promotion framework. Can J Public Health1992; 83 (Suppl 1):S67-S71.
(4). Koepsell TD, Wagner EH, Cheadle AC, PatrickDL, Martin DC, Diehr PH, et al. Selected metho-dological issues in evaluating community-ba-sed health promotion and disease preventionprograms. Annu Rev Public Health 1992; 13:31-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.000335
(5). Akerman M, Mendes R, Bogus CM, WestphalMF, Bichir A, Pedroso ML. [Health promotionevaluation: focus on “healthy cities”]. Rev Sau-de Publica 2002; 36(5):638-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102002000600016
(6). Gómez-Arias R. La noción de salud pública: con-secuencias de la polisemia. Rev Fac Nac SaludPública 2002;20(1):101-116.
(7). Leavell H, Clark E. Textbook of preventive medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-195401000-00025
(8). Bloom M. Primary prevention practices. Thou-sand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996.
(9). Durlak J. Successful prevention programs forchildren and adolescents. New York: PlenumPress; 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0065-4
(10). Small S, Memmo M. Contemporary models ofyouth development and problem prevention:toward a clarification and elaboration of con-cepts and frameworks. Madison: Human Deve-lopment & Family Studies University of Wis-consin; 2002.
(11). Coie J, Watt N, West S, Hawkins J, Asarnow J,Markman H, et al. The science of prevention: Aconceptual framework and some directions for anational research program. Am Psychol 1993;48:1013-1022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.48.10.1013
(12). O’Connor T, Rutter M. Risk mechanisms in deve-lopment: Some conceptual and methodologicalconsiderations. Dev Psychol 1996; 32:787-795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.32.4.787
(13). Nutbeam D. Glosario de promoción de la salud.En: Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Pro-moción de la salud: una antología. Washington,DC: OPS; 1996. (Publicación Científica, 557).
(14). Cardona J. El concepto de salud, enfermedad ysalud pública según los diferentes modos deproducción. Medellín: Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública. Universidad de Antioquia; 1988.
(15). Franco S, Ochoa D, Hernández M. La promoción de la salud y la seguridad social. Bogotá:Corporación Salud y Desarrollo; 1995.
(16). Terris M. Concepts of health promotion: duali-ties in public health theory. J Public Health Po-licy 1992; 13(3):267-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3342727
(17). Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health ofcanadians. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Cana-da; 1974.
(18). Green LW. National policy in the promotion ofhealth. Int J Health Educ 1979; 22:161-168.
(19). Green LW. Current report: Office of Health In-formation, Health promotion, Physical Fitnessand Sports Medicine. Health Educ 1980;11(2):28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00970050.1980.10619232
(20). Green LW, Iverson DC. School health educa-tion. Annu Rev Public Health 1982; 3:321-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.03.050182.001541
(21). Perry CL, Jessor R. The concept of health promotion and the prevention of adolescent drugabuse. Health Educ Q 1985; 12(2):169-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818501200204
(22). World Health Organization. Discussion document on the concept and principles of healthpromotion. Copenhagen: European Office of theWorld Health Organization;1984.
(23). Goodstadt MS, Simpson RI, Loranger P. Healthpromotion: A conceptual integration. Am J Heal-th Promot 1987; 1(3):58-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-1.3.58
(24). Kar SB. Health promotion indicators and actio-ns. New York: Springer; 1989.
(25). O ́Donell MP. Definition of health promotion.Part III: Expanding the definition. Am J HealthPromot 1989; 3(3):5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-3.3.5
(26). Labonté R, Little S. Determinats of health: em-powering strategies for nurses. Vancouver: Re-gistered Nurses Association of British Colum-bia; 1992.
(27). Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 4288de 1996, Nov. 20, por la cual se define el plan deatención básica (PAB) del Sistema General deSeguridad Social en Salud (SGSSS) y se dictanotras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Ministerio; 1996.
(28). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Carta deOttawa para la promoción de la salud. En: Orga-nización Panamericana de la Salud. Promociónde la salud: una antología. Washington, DC:OPS; 1996. (Publicación Científica, 557).
(29). McIntyre L. The evolution of health promotion.Probe 1992; 26(1):15-22.
(30). Kickbusch I. Promoción de la salud: una tipolo-gía. En: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.Promoción de la salud: una antología. Washington, DC: OPS; 1996. (Publicación Científica, 557).
(31). Downie R, et al. Health promotion: Models andvalues. Oxford: Oxford University; 1990.
(32). Petersen AR. Community development in heal-th promotion: empowerment or regulation? AustJ Public Health 1994; 18(2):213-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1994.tb00230.x
(33). Goodman RM, Speers MA, McLeroy K, Faw-cett S, Kegler M, Parker E, et al. Identifying anddefining the dimensions of community capaci-ty to provide a basis for measurement. HealthEduc Behav 1998; 25(3):258-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819802500303
(34). Anderson R. Health promotion: An overview.Edinburgh: Scotish Health Education Group;1984.
(35). Green LW, Raeburn J. Contemporary develop-ments in health promotion: Definitions and cha-llenges. In: Bracht N (ed). Health promotion andthe community level. Thousand Oaks: Sage;1990.
(36). Shiell A, Hawe P. Health promotion communitydevelopment and the tyranny of individualism.Health Econ 1996; 5(3):241-247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:3<241::AID-HEC197>3.0.CO;2-G
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
