Active learning in basic engineering courses: an example in the teaching of Dynamics

Authors

  • Carlos Andrés University of
  • Elvia María González Agudelo University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.7912

Keywords:

teaching, education, engineering education, active learning

Abstract

Traditionally, engineering higher education does not allow the  active  participation  of  students  in  their  learning  process,  because  they  are   passive actors in the process, limited to following  and trying  to understand what the teacher do on the  board,  to  later    apply  the  results  in  problems  that  are  assigned.  This form  of  traditional education also gets the students used to dependent on the teacher as a source of knowledge, which does  not  stimulate  intellectual  autonomy.  Therefore, teaching  strategies  focus  on  active  learning are   the most   relevant   concerning   participative   instruction,   competence   development   and stimulation of student autonomy. In this paper, an active learning teaching strategy is proposed to be  used in  basic  engineering  courses, exemplifying  its  application  in  the  Dynamics  course  for  the Department  of  Mechanical  Engineering  at  the  University  of  Antioquia.    It  is  proposed  that  such strategy  is  a valid alternative for the teaching of basic  engineering courses, where problem based learning is usually not of pertinence.

|Abstract
= 386 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 161 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlos Andrés, University of

Doctor of Mechanical Engineering. Professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the University of Antioquia.

Elvia María González Agudelo, University of Antioquia

Doctor in Pedagogical Sciences. Coordinator of the Didactic Group of Higher Education (DIDES) of the Faculty of Education at the University of Antioquia. Professor at the University of Antioquia.

References

Abet 2008. Annual report. ABET, Inc. Estados Unidos. 2009.

Álvarez, C. y González, E. (2003). Lecciones de didáctica general. Medellín: Editorial Magisterio.

Barriga, F. y Hernández, G. (2001). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista. Bogotá, D.C: McGraw-Hill.

Bonwell, C. y Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1.Washington, D.C: Jossey-Bass.

Føllesdal, D. (1979). Hermeneutics and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method. Dialéctica, 33, (3-4), 319-336.

Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education. Research and development in curriculum and instruction. Estados Unidos: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Koen, B. (2000). El método de ingeniería. Bogotá, D.C: Universidad del Valle-ACOFI...Mayer, R. (s.f). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist. 59, (1), 14-19.

Meriam, J. y Kraige, L. (1997). Engineering Mechanics. Dynamics. (4ª ed). Estados Unidos: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Valencia, A. (2005). Una aproximación a la ingeniería.Medellín: UdeA.

Wright, P. (2004). Introducción a la ingeniería.(3ª ed.). México: Limusa Wiley.

Published

2011-02-25

How to Cite

Carlos Andrés, & González Agudelo, E. M. (2011). Active learning in basic engineering courses: an example in the teaching of Dynamics. Uni-Pluriversidad, 10(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.7912

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>