Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Students’ Writing Production: The Impact of a Metacognition-based Intervention


  • Mark Briesmaster Universidad Católica de Temuco
  • Paulo Etchegaray Universidad Católica de Temuco



EFL, metacognition, L2 writing, coherence, cohesion


The objective of this Action Research study was to identify the impact of metacognitive training on the development of coherence and cohesion in the writing production, at the paragraph level, of EFL learners. The participants included 19 students from an 8th grade Chilean public school who took part in a 9-week class intervention. These classes focused on the students learning to write paragraphs in English by using metacognitive techniques such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating their own production while paying particular attention to coherence and cohesion. As instruments for data collection, L2 writing pre and post-tests were utilized. Additionally, two qualitative research techniques were employed to identify the metacognitive writing procedures used by the students before and after the metacognitive intervention. The results suggest that the EFL students used more metacognitive procedures when writing at the end of the intervention. Moreover, a slight improvement was observed in the area of cohesion.

= 1243 veces | PDF
= 914 veces| | HTML
= 94 veces| | XHML
= 13 veces| | APPENDICES
= 0 veces| | AUTHORS
= 0 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mark Briesmaster, Universidad Católica de Temuco

Professor of Pedagogy in English at the Faculty of Education, Catholic University of Temuco, Chile. Director of the Master’s Degree Program in Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Catholic University of Temuco, Chile.

Paulo Etchegaray, Universidad Católica de Temuco

Researcher in a Pedagogy degree in English at the Faculty of Education, Catholic University of Temuco, Chile. Professor of English at Fundación del Magisterio de la Araucanía, Temuco, Chile.


Aalto University (2014). Kie-98.1600 English reading/writing test: Study material. Retrieved on February 23rd, 2015 from

Bailey, S. (2011). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (3rd ed.). Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.

Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Blázquez, F., & Tagle, T. (2010). Formación docente: Un estudio de las creencias de alumnos y profesores sobre el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje del inglés. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 54(4), 1-12.

Briesmaster, M., & Briesmaster-Paredes, J. (2015). The relationship between teaching styles and NNPSETs' anxiety levels. System, 49, 145-156.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY/Abingdon: Routledge.

Cassany, D. (2005). Expresión escrita en L2/LE. Madrid: Arco Libros.

Cornejo, T. (2002). Modelamiento metacognitivo: Un aprendizaje de estrategias para la comprensión de lectura. Horizontes Educacionales, 7, 64-70.

Cushing Weigle, S. (2014). Considerations for teaching second language writing. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M.

Brinton & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 222-237). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning/Heinle.

De Andrés, V. (1999). Self-esteem in the classroom or the metamorphosis of butterflies. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 87-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Díaz, G. (2013). Metacognitive writing strategies in academic writing: The path to enhance autonomy and to become expert writers (Master’s thesis). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba.

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY/ Abingdon: Routledge.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H.

Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Flower, L., & Hayes. J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.

Glanz, J. (2014). Action research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Gobierno de Chile (2015). Entrega de resultados de aprendizaje 2014: Simce e indicadores de desarrollo personal y social. Retrieved on July 1st, 2015 from

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (2014). Theory and practice of writing. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2013). Cohesion in English. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: Longman.

Hedge, T. (2005). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. New York, NY/London: Routledge.

Hinkel, E. (2015). Effective curriculum for teaching L2 writing: Principles and techniques. New York, NY/Abingdon: Routledge.

Hussein, A. A., & Mohammad, M. F. M. (2011). Negative L1 impact on L2 writing. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 184-195.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2004). Writing in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Abingdon: Routledge.

Inostroza, G. (2005). La práctica: Motor de la formación docente. Santiago: Comunicaciones Noreste.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an EFL/ESL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). (pp. 219-232). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.

Larkin, S. (2010). Metacognition in young children. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 219-237.

Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes: Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102-129). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

McInerney, D. M. (2014). Educational psychology: Constructing learning (6th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.

MinEduc & British Council (2012). La formación de docentes de inglés en Chile: El desafío de la calidad y la pertinencia: ¿Qué aspectos críticos deben ser cautelados? Retrieved on October 18th, 2014 from

Mistar, J., Zuhairi, A., & Nuryatin, A. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategies training in the teaching of writing skill in an EFL context. In S. Wachidah, D. Rochsantiningsih, I. Yuliasri, K. O. Al-Zubaidi, & M.

Anugerahwati (Eds.), Proceedings of 3rd English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation International Conference (pp. 445-457). Semarang, Indonesia: Semarang State University.

Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. New York, NY/Abingdon: Routledge.

Navarro, E. B. (2000). Alfabetización emergente y metacognición. Revista Signos, 33(47), 111-121.

Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142-179.

Nooshin, F., Behjat, F., & Rostampour, M. (2014). The relationship between L1 grammar and L2 writing for Iranian male students at high school level. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 230-246.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Ormeño, V. (2009). Metacognitive awareness-raising in EFL teacher education with special reference to a Chilean context (Doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

Pajares, F. (2006). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence: Implications for teachers and parents. In F.

Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 339-367). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Peronard, M. (2005). La metacognición como herramienta didáctica. Revista Signos, 38(57), 61-74.

Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London/New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

Piaget, J. (1973). Main trends in psychology. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety, and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 164-194). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Proust, J. (2013). The philosophy of metacognition: Mental agency and self-awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rufinelli, A., Valdebenito, M. J., Rojas, M. T., Sepúlveda, L., Falabella, A., Cisternas, T., Echeverría, P., & Ermter, K. (2012). Procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje desde la perspectiva de los profesores en Chile. Santiago: Universidad Alberto Hurtado/Unesco/Mineduc.

Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 224-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.

Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C.

Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278-298). New York, NY/Abingdon: Routledge.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Tagle, T., Díaz, C., Alarcón, P., Quintana, M., & Ramos, L. (2014). Creencias sobre el aprendizaje del inglés en la formación inicial docente. Educere, 18(61), 473-482.

Tankó, G. (2005). Into Europe: The writing handbook. Budapest: Teleki Lázló Foundation.

Van der Stel, M. (2011). Development of metacognitive skills in young adolescents: A bumpy ride to the high road (Doctoral dissertation). Leiden University, Leiden.

Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY/Abingdon: Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wilkinson, D., & Birminghan, P. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. London: Routledge Falmer.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J.

Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). New York, NY/Abingdon: Routledge.



How to Cite

Briesmaster, M., & Etchegaray, P. (2017). Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Students’ Writing Production: The Impact of a Metacognition-based Intervention. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 22(2), 183–202.



Empirical Studies

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.