Sociophonetic Study on Male Voice Perception and Sexual Orientation Stereotypes
AbstractOur work focuses on the perception of the male voice in relation to the stereotypes associated with sexual orientation. Through the use of a perceptual test conducted in France in 2012, we have tried to determine the ability of people to identify an individual's sexual orientation. In addition, we have analyzed the perception of six men's voices (three homosexual men and three heterosexual men) around five criteria: authority, masculinity, voice pitch, sympathy and warm attitude. To evaluate the validity of the judges' answers, we used the Chi-squared test. The perceptual test results have allowed us to question the relationship between these stereotypes and the identification of sexual orientation. However, the optimization of protocols and methodology is necessary to better understand the language strategies mobilized by minority and majority groups.
Arnold, A. (2015). La voix genrée, entre idéologies et pra-tiques –Une étude sociophonétique (Thèse de doctorat, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3). Récupéré de la plateforme d’accès et de dépôt des publications scientifiques de l’Université https://hal-univ-paris3.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01508858/
Baker, P. (2008). Sexed tests. Language, gender and sexuality. Londres : Equinox Publishing.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subver-sion of identity. New York : Routledge.
Cameron, D. (1998). Performing gender identity: young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual mas-culinity. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and Gender. A Reader (pp. 270-284). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Gaudio, R. P. (1994). Sounding gay: pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech,69(1), 30-57.
Jacobs, G. (1996). Lesbian and gay male language use: a critical review of the literature. American Speech, 71(1), 49-68.
Jacobs, G. Rogers, H. & Smyth, R. (1999). Searching for phonetic correlates of gay- and straight-sounding voices. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English (and other languages). Toronto.
Kiesling, S. F. (2007). Men, masculinities, and language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 653-673.Kulick, D. (2000). Gay and lesbian language. Annual Re-view of Anthropology, 29, 243-285.
Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge : Cam-bridge University Press.
Munson, B. (2007). The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation. Language and Speech, 50(1), 125-142.Oxford English Dictionary (2017). Oxford University Press. Disponible sur http://www.oed.com
Pasquesoone, V. (2012, 10 mai). En Argentine, choi-sir son genre devient un droit. Le Monde. Récupéré de http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2012/05/10/en-argentine-choisir-son-genre-devient-un-droit_1699205_3222.html
Preston, D. R. et Niedzielski, N. (2010). A Reader in Socio-phonetics. Berlin/Boston : De Gruyter Mouton.
Smyth, R., Jacobs, G., & Rogers, H. (2003). Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: an experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society, 32(3), 329-350.
Talbot, M. (2005). Gender stereotypes: reproduction and challenge. Dans J. Holmes et M. Meyerhoff (Ed.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 468-486). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Thomas, E. (2002). Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech, 77(2), 115-138.
West, C. et Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gen-der and Society, 1(2), 125-151
Copyright (c) 2018 Íkala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors that publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
Share alike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.