L’Agentivité parmi les enseignants d’anglais en Malaisie à propos de l’utilisation des technologies numériques pendant la pandémie : une enquête narrative
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n3a07Mots-clés :
agentivité de l’enseignant, développement professionnel, tic, enquête narrative, enseignants d'anglais, enseignement en ligneRésumé
Avec la fermeture des établissements d'enseignement en raison des quarantaines imposées dans de nombreuses régions du monde, les enseignants ont été contraints de faire une transition accélérée de l'enseignement présentielle dans des salles de classe à l'enseignement en ligne, même s'ils n'avaient que peu ou nulle expérience dans ce genre d’enseignement avant la pandémie. Adoptant une approche de recherche narrative, la présente étude vise à explorer les facteurs qui influencent l'agence professionnelle des enseignants d'anglais malaisiens dans leur adaptation à l'enseignement en ligne. Les données ont été recueillies au moyen d'entretiens avec dix enseignants d'enseignement secondaire dans des écoles rurales
et urbaines. Les résultats montrent comment des facteurs tels que les perceptions des enseignants sur les possibilités des outils numériques et les structures de soutien existantes influencent l'exercice de l'agence des enseignants dans l'enseignement et l'apprentissage en ligne. Ils démontrent également le potentiel agent des enseignants pour adapter leurs cours aux besoins des élèves. Cela suggère la nécessité de créer des programmes de développement professionnel qui reconnaissent l'agence de l'enseignant dans la
conception des futurs modules de formation. Cela implique de proposer des programmes de formation différenciée capable de supporter organiquement le développement des enseignants de langues, compte tenu de leurs compétences technologiques antérieures, de leurs expériences dans l'enseignement et de leurs contextes de travail.
Téléchargements
Références
Aguliera, E., & Nightengale-Lee, B. (2020). Emergency remote teaching across urban and rural contexts: Perspectives on educational equity. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0100
Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, JALN, 5 (20), 1–17.
Bailey, D. R., & Lee, A. R. (2020). Learning from experience in the midst of covid-19: benefits, challenges, and strategies in online teaching. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(2), 178–198.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Budianto, Langgeng, and Yudhi Arifani. (2021). Utilizing WhatsApp-driven learning during COVID-19 outbreak: EFL users’ perceptions and practices. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 264–281.
Butler, M., & Fawkes, S. (1999). Videoconferencing for language learners. Language Learning Journal, 19(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739985200091
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184
Carville, S., & Mitchell, D. R. (2000). ‘It’s a bit like Star Trek’: The effectiveness of video conferencing. Innovations in education and training international, 37(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/135580000362070
Cheung, A. (2021). Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of zoom use by a secondary esl teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 0033688220981784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220981784
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry. Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey Bass.
Compton, L. K. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613831
Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
Dicte (2019). Pedagogical, ethical, attitudinal and technical dimensions of digital competence in teacher education. Developing ICT in Teacher Education Erasmus+project. https://dicte.oslomet.no/dicte/
Edwards, A. (2015). Recognising and realising teachers’ professional agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 779–784.
Egbert, J. (2020). The new normal?: A pandemic of task engagement in language learning. Foreign language annals, 53(2), 314–319.
Etherington, K., & Bridges, N. (2011). Narrative case study research: On endings and six session reviews. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 11(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2011.546072
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of Distance Education, 1, 113–127.
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hathaway, D. M. (2020). “We always make it work”: Teachers’ agency in the time of crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 239–250.
Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2000) Doing qualitative research differently. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209007
Halvorsen, Ø. W., Eide, L., & Ulvik, M. (2019). Extension and remodelling of teachers’ perceived professional space. Teachers and Teaching, 25(8), 1030–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1702519
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12.
Husu, J. (2000). Supporting remote communities with a shared virtual classroom: A view of social contexts. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 9(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200085
Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2020). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809
Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: The effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2
Kaden, U. (2020). COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teacher. Education Sciences, 10(6), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060165
Lawson, T., Comber, C., Gage, J., & Cullum‐Hanshaw, A. (2010). Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.513761
Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., & Lepp, L. (2020). Teacher agency following the ecological model: How it is achieved and how it could be strengthened by different types of reflection. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1672855
Mehta, R., & Aguilera, E. (2020). A critical approach to humanizing pedagogies in online teaching and learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0099
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., Hadar, L. L., Smith, K., Helleve, I., & Ulvik, M. (2017). Teachers’ perceived professional space and their agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.005
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? In J. Evers & R. Kneyber (Eds.), Flip the system (pp. 134–148). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678573
Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2013). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Sage.
Singh, C. K. S., Singh, T. S. M., Abdullah, N. Y., Moneyam, S., Ismail, M. R., Tek, O. E., ... & Singh, J. K. S. (2020). Rethinking English language teaching through Telegram, Whatsapp, Google Classroom and Zoom. Sys Rev Pharm, 11(11), 45–54.
Smyth, W., & Fay, J. (1994). Video conferencing between schools in Northern Ireland and schools in France. North Eastern Education and Library Board.
Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press.
Thumvichit, A. (2021). English language teaching in times of crisis: Teacher agency in response to the pandemic- forced online education. Teaching English with Technology, 21(2), 14–37.
Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. C. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044334
Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., Krutka, D. G., & Kimmons, R. (2020). #RemoteTeaching & #RemoteLearning: Educator tweeting during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 151–159. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216094/
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Agentic perspective on fostering work-related learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2017.1310097
Wang, C. C., & Geale, S. K. (2015). The power of story: Narrative inquiry as a methodology in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(2), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.04.014
Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1), 122–145.
Zainal, A. Z., & Zainuddin, S. Z. (2020). Technology adoption in Malaysian schools: An analysis of national ICT in education policy initiatives. Digital Education Review (37), 172–194.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Catégories
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Íkala 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
