The Role of Rubrics in Fair Assessment Practices

Edgar Picón-Jácome

doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.14080

Autores/as

Edgar Picón-Jácome Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.14080

Palabras clave:

rúbricas, justicia, democracia, evaluación alternativa, evaluación formativa, lenguas extranjeras

Resumen

En este artículo se sustenta la tesis de que la utilización de rúbricas consensuadas garantiza en gran medida la promoción de prácticas evaluativas justas. Esta aseveración se basa en el argumento de que la creación y aplicación de rúbricas incrementa la validez y la transparencia en la evaluación, a la par que su diseño consensuado promueve la democracia, posibilita el impacto positivo en el aprendizaje o efecto washback y facilita prácticas equitativas —siendo todos estos principios inherentes a la justicia. Se enfatiza en un concepto de rúbrica que integra una tarea auténtica y su escala de valoración, como procedimiento de evaluación alternativa, dentro de un enfoque crítico.

|Resumen

= 529 veces | PDF (ENGLISH)

= 376 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Edgar Picón-Jácome, Universidad de Antioquia

Profesor Ayudante, Escuela de Idiomas.

Citas

Arias, C., Estrada, L., Areiza, H., & Restrepo, E. A. (2009). Sistema de evaluación en Lenguas Extranjeras. Medellín, Colombia: Reimpresos, Universidad de Antioquia.

Arias, C., & Maturana, L. (2005). Evaluación en lenguas extranjeras: Discursos y prácticas. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 10, 63–91.

Arias, C., Maturana, L., & Restrepo, M. I. (2012). Evaluación de los aprendizajes en lenguas extranjeras: Hacia prácticas justas y democráticas. Revista Lenguaje, 40(1), 99–126.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Birchak, B., Connor, C., Crawford, K. M., Kahn, L.H., Kaser, S., Turner, S., & Short, K. (1998). Teacher study groups: Building community through dialogue and reflection. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English.

Brown, D. H. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York, NY: Longman.

Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653–675.

Frodden, C., & Picón, E. (2005). El desarrollo de la autonomía del profesor: Un estudio de caso. Boletín de Investigación Educacional, 20, 285–300.

Frodden, C., Restrepo, M. I., & Maturana, L. M. (2004). Analysis of assessment instruments used in foreign language teaching. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 9(15), 171–201.

Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. New York, NY: Routledge Applied Linguistics.

García-Ros, R. (2011). Análisis y validación de una rúbrica para evaluar habilidades de presentación oral en contextos universitarios. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 1043–1062.

Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.

Goodrich-Andrade, H. (n.d.). Understanding rubrics. Recuperado de http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/rubricar.htm

Halonnen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, Sh., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill, G. W., McEntarffer, R., Mehrotra, Ch., Nesmith, R., Weaber, K. A., & Whitlock, K. (2009). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in Psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 196–208. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP3003_01

Hewitt, G. (1995). A portfolio primer: Teaching, collecting, and assessing student writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Instituto Cervantes (2002). Marco de referencia europeo para el aprendizaje, la enseñanza y la evaluación de lenguas [documento electrónico], Estrasburgo, (Traducción al español de Alejandro Valero Fernández). Recuperado de http:cvc.cervantes.es/obref/marco/

Instituto de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Cooperación Internacional, HEGOA (n.d.). Equidad. Recuperado de http://www.bantaba.ehu.es/obs/ocont/eq/

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.edurev.2007.05.002

Lamb, T. (2010). Assessment of autonomy or assessment for autonomy? Evaluating learner autonomy for formative purposes. En A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.). Testing the untestable in language education (pp. 98–119). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Lippman, J. (2003). Assessing writing. En I. Clark & B. Bamberg (Eds.), Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing (pp. 199–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Tomado de University of Pittsburg NETLIBRARY database (79439) http://www.library.pitt.edu/articles/database_info/netlibrary.html

Lopez, A., & Bernal, R. (2009). Language testing in Colombia: A call for more teacher education and teacher training in language assessment. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 11(2), 55–70.

Mansoor, I., & Grant, S. (2002). A writing rubric to assess ESL student performance [Electronic version]. Adventures in Assessment, 14, 33–38. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 482885).

Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25). Tomado de http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25

Moskal, Barbara M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3). Tomado de http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3

Muñoz, A., & Álvarez, M. (2008). A study of the effect of a writing assessment system on instruction. MEXTESOL Journal, 32(2), 55–70.

Muñoz, A., & Álvarez, M. (2010). Washback of an oral assessment system in the EFL classroom. Language Testing, 27(1), 1–17.

Muñoz, A., Álvarez, M., Casas, S., Gaviria S., & Palacio, M. (2003). Validation of an oral assessment tool for classroom use. Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal, 137–157

Muñoz, A., Palacio, M., & Escobar, L. (2012). Teachers' beliefs about assessment in an EFL context in Colombia. Profile, 14(1), 143–158.

O'Malley, J. M., & Valdez, P. L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. New York, NY: Longman.

Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning styles and strategies. En M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.), (pp. 359–366).

Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002

Picón, E. (2007). Rubric: A scoring device to enhance fair assessment. Cartilla pedagógica para la formación de maestros en ejercicio. Medellín, Colombia: Escuela de Idiomas, Universidad de Antioquia.

Picón, E. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through teacher-student partnership assessment in an American high school: A cycle of action research. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 14(3), 145–162.

Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859

Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(10), 1–13.

Savignon, S. J. (2001). Communicative language teaching for the twenty-first century. M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.), (pp. 13–28). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Shohamy, E. (1998). Evaluation of learning outcomes in second language acquisition: A multiplism perspective. En Byrnes H. (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 238–261).

Shohamy, E. (2001). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing 18(4), 373–391.

Shohamy, E., & Inbar, O. (2006). The language assessment process: A multiplism perspective, (Professional Development Document 0603). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research.

Stevens, D., & Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Suskie, L. (2002). Fair assessment practices: Giving students equitable opportunities to demonstrate learning [Electronic version]. Adventures in Assessment, 14, 5–10. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 482885).

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?

Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.

Williams, J. (2003). Preparing to teach writing: Research, theory and practice (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Tomado de University of Pittsburg NETLIBRARY database (83850), http://www.library.pitt.edu/articles/database_info/netlibrary.html