Les stratégies de lecture en anglais de deux enseignants d'anglais en formation
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.9910Mots-clés :
stratégies, compréhension de lecture, métacognition, étudiants d'enseignement de l'anglais.Résumé
Cette étude présente les résultats d'une analyse de lecture réalisée par deux étudiants d'une université située au cœur du pays; actuellement ils sont inscrits dans un programme d'enseignement d'anglais. L'étude se centre sur leurs techniques à fin de se rapprocher du texte et d'en améliorer sa compréhension. L'information ci-dessus est l'aboutissement d'une lecture réalisée d'après une méthode de pensée à voix haute (think-aloud), et d'une analyse conséquente, effectuée selon un processus de comparaison permanente (Glasser & Strauss, 1999). Les résultats suggèrent que la lecture des participants se distingue par des écarts dans trois domaines: le nombre de stratégies évoquées, la fréquence d'utilisation et la qualité de son emploi par chaque lecteur. À partir des deux cas on discute les implications visant l'enseignement de la lecture et des futures recherches.
Téléchargements
Références
Aguirre-Morales, J. & Ramos-Holguín, B. (2009). Guidance in reading strategies: A first step towards autonomous learning in a semi-distance education program. Profile, 11(1), 41-56.
Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In Pearson, P. D., Barr, R., Kamil. M. L. y Mosenthal, P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494.
Cummins, J. (1979a). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121-129.
Fotovatian, S. & Shokrpour, N. (2007). Comparison of the efficiency of reading comprehension strategies on Iranian university students' comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 47-63.
Gallimore, R. & Goldenberg, C. (1993). Activity settings of early literacy: Home and school factors in children's emergent literacy. In Forman, E. A., Minick, N. & Stone, C. A. (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gallimore, R. & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching and mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
García, G. E. (1998). Mexican-American bilingual students' metacognitive reading strategies: What's transferred, unique, problematic? In 47th yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 253-263). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference, Inc.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Goldman, S. R., Reyes, M. & Varnhagen, C. K. (1984). Understanding fables in first and second languages. NABE Journal, 8(2), 35-66.
Handsfield, L. J. & Jiménez, R. T. (2008). Revisiting cognitive strategy instruction in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: Cautions and possibilities. Language Arts, 85(6), 450-458.
ICFES. (2006). Análisis resultados 2006. Retrieved January 20th, 2009, from http://www.icfes.gov.co
ICFES. (2010). Porcentaje de estudiantes por niveles de competencia a nivel nacional. Retrieved from http://www.icfesinteractivo.gov.co/resultados/informes/snee_rep_res_est_tmp.jsp
Jiménez, R. T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-literacy Latina/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 224-243.
Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E. & Pearson, P. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies of bilingual and monolingual readers. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 67-97.
Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E. & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 2-25.
Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2003). Reading in two languages: How attitudes toward home language and beliefs about reading affect the behaviors of ''underprepared L2 college readers''. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 35-71.
Keene, E. O. (2008). To understand: New horizons in reading comprehension. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Kohn, M., Landon, R. & Kohnstamm, T. (2006). Colombia (4 ed.). Footscray, Australia: Lonely Planet Publications.
McTavish, M. (2008). ''what were you thinking?'' The use of metacognitive strategies during engagement with reading narrative and informational genres. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 405-431.
Nagy, W. E., García, G. E., Durgunoglu, A. Y. & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Spanish-English bilingual students use of cognates in English reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(3), 241-259.
Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian university students. Profile, 11(1), 29-40.
Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. M., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J. et al. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 513-555.
Pressley, M. & Hilden, K. (2004). Verbal protocols of reading. In Duke, N. K. & Mallete, M. H. (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies. New York: The Guilford Press.
Rudell, R. B. & Rudell, M. R. (1995). Teaching children to read and write: Becoming an influential teacher. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Tracey, D. H. & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York: The Guilford Press.
Yin, W. M. & Agnes, C. S. C. (2001). Knowledge and use of metacognitive strategies. Retrieved January 12, 2009, from http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/won01419.htm
Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268-288.