Ler em contextos de distração: o papel da inibição e a definição de objetivos na compreensão de textos acadêmicos em formatos digitais

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a04

Palavras-chave:

compreensão de leitura, contextos de distração, ensino superior, definiçã de objetivos, inibição, textos académicos digitais

Resumo

O texto escrito é o principal instrumento de acesso ao conhecimento disciplinar no ensino superior. Hoje, as tarefas de leitura são mais frequentemente realizadas sobre textos digitais, o que implica um ambiente de leitura suscetível de distração, o que exige do leitor controlar processos cognitivos chave para garantir a compreensão do conteúdo. Este artigo relata os resultados de um estudo piloto experimental, cujo objetivo era analisar o efeito de duas funções executivas: a capacidade de inibição na frente de um estímulo perturbador e a capacidade de definir objetivos, para a compreensão de textos académicos digitais. Para este fim, nós utilizamos a técnica de registro de movimentos oculares durante a leitura. Trinta e nove estudantes de Psicologia do primeiro e segundo anos de uma universidade chilena participaram no teste. Os resultados revelaram que, em contextos de distração, a possibilidade de definir objetivos com base em instruções relevantes melhora a compreensão de textos académicos digitais. Conclui-se que, nestas situações de leitura, ter instruções relevantes está associado a um processamento focalizado e eficiente do texto, o qual reduz o efeito negativo, na compreensão, de elementos estranhos da tarefa.

|Resumo
= 710 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 37 veces| | VISOR (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 8 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 413 veces|

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Pamela Ramírez-Peña, Universidad de Concepción

Ph. D. Psychology. Scholarly Assistant, Department of Spanish/School of Education, Universidad de Concepción, Chile.

Claudia Paz Pérez-Salas, Universidad de Concepción

Profesora asociada, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
cperezs@udec.cl

Bernardo Riffo-Ocares, Universidad de Concepción, Chile

Profesor titular, Departamento de Español, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
bernardo@udec.cl

Raquel Cerdán Otero, Universidad de Valencia, España

Profesora titular, ERI Lectura (Estructura de Investigación en Lectura), Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España.
raquel.cerdan@uv.es

Referências

Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (ef) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724

Annerer-Walcher, S., Korner, C., Beaty, R. E. y Benedek, M. (2020). Eye behavior predicts susceptibility to visual distraction during internally directed cognition. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 3432-3444. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02068-1

Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M. y Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.902461

Balluerka, N. y Vergara, A. I. (2002). Diseños de investigación experimental en psicología. Pearson.

Borella, E., Carreti, B. y Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371676

Borella, E. y de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001

Canet-Juric, L., Burin, D., Andrés, M. L. y Urquijo, S. (2013). Perfil cognitivo de niños con bajos rendimientos en comprensión lectora. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 996-1005. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.138221

Canet-Juric, L., Urquijo, S., Richard’s, M. y Burin, D. (2009). Predictores cognitivos de niveles de comprensión lectora mediante análisis discriminante. International Journal of Psychological Research, 2(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.865

Cerdán, R., Marín, M. y Candel, C. (2013). The role of perspective on students’ use of multiple documents to solve an open-ended task. Psicología Educativa, 19(2), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-755X(13)70015-0

Cerdán, R., Pérez, A., Vidal-Abarca, E. y Rouet, J. F. (2019). To answer questions from text, one has to understand what the question is asking: Differential effects of question aids as a function of comprehension skill. Reading and Writing, 32, 2111-2124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09943-w

De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F. y Cornoldi, C. (1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755761

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R. y Salmeron, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003

Demagistri, M. S., Richards, M. M. y Canet Juric, L. (2014). Incidence of executive functions on reading comprehension performance in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(2), 343-370. https:// doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.33.13146

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Follmer, D. J. (2017). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295

Friedman, N. P. y Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101

Friedman, N. P. y Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023

Georgiou, G. y Das, J .P. (2016). What component of executive functions contributes to normal and impaired reading comprehension in young adults? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49(50), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.001

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4(5), 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00567.x

Gaspelin, N. y Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001

Jian, Y.-C. (2018). Reading instructions facilitate signaling effect on science text for young readers: An eye-movement study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9878-y

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.

León, J. A., Moreno, J. D., Escudero, I., Olmos, R., Ruiz, M. y Lorch, R. (2019). Specific relevance instructions promote selective reading strategies: Evidences from eye tracking and oral summaries. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12276

McCrudden, M. (2011). Do specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing? Instructional Science, 39(6), 865-879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9158-x

McCrudden, M. y Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7

Parodi, G., Moreno-de-León, T. y Julio, C. (2020). Comprensión de textos escritos: reconceptualizaciones en torno a las demandas del siglo xxi. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(3), 775-795. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n03a10

Piovano, S., Irrazabal, N. y Burin, D. I. (2018). Comprensión de textos expositivos académicos en e-book Reader y en papel: influencia del conocimiento previo de dominio y la aptitud verbal. Ciencias Psicológicas, 12(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v12i2.1680

Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J. y Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8- to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: The role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415613080

Ramírez-Peña, P. (2020). Funciones ejecutivas y comprensión de textos académicos en estudiantes de primer año [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Concepción]. http://repositorio.udec.cl/xmlui/handle/11594/4667

Rapp, D. N. y McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Relevance before, during, and after discourse experiences. In A. Schüller-Zwierlein (Ed.), Relevance and irrelevance: Theories, factors and challenges (pp. 141-160). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472509-007

Riffo, B., Véliz, M., Reyes, F., Castro, G., Reyes, A. y Campos, D. (2013). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Desarrollo de un instrumento basado en un modelo psicolingüístico. Universidad de Concepción.

Roldán, L. A. (2016). Inhibición y actualización en comprensión de textos: una revisión. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-2.iact

Rozek, E., Kemper, S. y McDowd, J. (2012). Learning to ignore distracters. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025578

Salmerón, L. y Delgado, P. (2019). Critical analysis of the effects of the digital technologies on reading and learning / Análisis crítico sobre los efectos de las tecnologías digitales en la lectura y el aprendizaje. Culture and Education, 31(3), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1630958

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding. Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. rand Corporation.

Véliz, M., Riffo, B. y Salazar, O. (2013a). Lectum 7. Prueba de comprensión lectora, forma A. Universidad de Concepción.

Véliz, M., Riffo, B. y Salazar, O. (2013b). Lectum 7. Prueba de comprensión lectora, forma B. Universidad de Concepción.

Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J. y Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336632

Vidal-Abarca, E., Salmeron, L. y Mañá, A. (2011). Individual differences in task-oriented reading. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano y G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 267-293). Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Wilcockson, T. D. W., Mardanbegi, D., Sawyer, P., Gellerser, H., Xia, B. Q. y Crawford, T. J. (2019). Oculomotor and inhibitory control in dyslexia. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00066

Publicado

2022-02-11

Como Citar

Ramírez-Peña, P., Pérez-Salas, . C. P., Riffo-Ocares, . B., & Cerdán Otero, . R. (2022). Ler em contextos de distração: o papel da inibição e a definição de objetivos na compreensão de textos acadêmicos em formatos digitais. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 27(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a04