The Use of Genre Theory for Improving Writing Proficiency Skills in  Explanations

María Martínez Lirola

doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.v20n2a04

Autor/innen

María Martínez Lirola Universidad de Alicante https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-425X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v20n2a04

Schlagworte:

genre theory, academic writing, text types, explanation, tutorials

Abstract

The study reported in this paper focuses on the use of genre theory as an appropriate framework for English L2 writing in the subject English Language IV of the degree in English Studies. We compared 40 explanations written by students in this course at the University of Alicante (Spain) before and after they had studied different text types following genre theory. This study will show that using the theory of genre as a framework to teach academic writing helped students to improve their level of literacy through the study of text types and specific grammatical structures that appear in these texts. Findings suggest that exposing students to good models of different text types, paying special attention to explanations, and asking them to write texts based on these models, improves students’ texts from the grammatical and the textual points of view.

|Abstract

= 847 veces | PDF (ENGLISH)

= 402 veces| | HTML (ENGLISH)

= 15 veces| | HTML (ENGLISH)

= 64 veces| | DATA (ENGLISH)

= 0 veces|

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Autor/innen-Biografie

María Martínez Lirola, Universidad de Alicante

Main Professor University of Alicante/University of Alicante Research Fellow, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, University of South Africa (UNISA)

Literaturhinweise

Artemeva, N. & Freedman, A. (eds.) (2006). Rhetorical Genre Studies and Beyond. Winnipeg: Inkshed Publications.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Articles in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Biber, D. (2006). University Language. A corpus–based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Bitchener, J., Young, S. & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191–205.

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Bruce, I. (2008). Academic Writing and Genre. A Systematic Analysis. London: Continuum.

Butt, D.; Fahey, R.; Spinks, S. & Yallop, C. (2012). Using Functional Grammar. An Explorer's Guide (3rd. ed.). Melbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carrasquillo, A.L. & Rodríguez, V. (2008). Language Minority Students in the Mainstream Classroom (2nd. ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Coe, R., Lingard, L. & Teslenko, T. (eds.) (2002). The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Coffin, C. (2001). Theoretical approaches to written language –a TESOL Perspective. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (eds.), Analysing English in a Global Context. A Reader (pp. 93–122). London: Routledge.

De Silva Joyce, H. & Feez, S. (2012). Text–based Language and Literacy Education: Programming and Methodology. Sydney: Phoenix Education.

Devitt, A.J. (2004). Writing Genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Droga, L. and Humphrey, S. (2003). Grammar and Meaning. An Introduction for Primary Teachers. Berry NSW: Target Texts.

Humphrey, S., Droga, L. and Feez, S. (2012).Grammar and Meaning. Newtown, NSW: PETAA.

Edelsky, C. (2006). Literacy and Justice for All: Rethinking the Social in Language and Education (Language, Culture, and Teaching) (3rd. ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

Fecho, B. (2011). Teaching for the Students. Habits of Heart, Mind, and Practice in the Engaged Classroom. New York/London: Teachers College Press.

Fenstermacher, G. D. & Soltis, J. F. (2009). Approaches to Teaching (5th. ed.). New York/London: Teachers College Press.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The 'grammar correction' debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime...?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62.

Freedman, A. & Medway, P. (eds.) (1995). Genre in the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.

Gardner, S. (2012). Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 52–63.

Halliday, M.A.K (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Hammond, J. & Derewianka, B. (2001). Genre. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 186–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.).

London/New York: Longman.

Hasan, R. (1989). The structure of the text. In M.A.K. Halliday and R. Hasan (eds.). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social–Semiotic Perspective (2nd ed.) (pp. 52–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hua, Z., Seedhouse, P., Li, W. & Cook, V. (2007). An introduction. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, W. Li & V. Cook (eds.), Language Learning and Teaching as Social Inter–action (pp. 1–5). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31, 217–230.

Klein, P. & Unsworth, L. (2014). The logogenesis of writing to learn: A systemic functional perspective. Linguistics and Education, 26, 1–17.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.

Mahboob, A., Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S. & Martin, J.R. (2010). Applicable linguistics and English language teaching: the scaffolding literacy in adult and tertiary environments (SLATE) project. In A. Mahboob and N. K. Knight (eds.), Applicable Linguistics (pp. 25–43). London: Continuum.

Martin, J.R. (2000). Grammar meets genre: reflections on the ''Sydney School''. Educational Research on Foreign Languages and Arts, 2, 28–54.

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2012). Learning to Write/Learning to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.

Martínez Lirola, M. (2006). The importance of teaching systemic functional linguistics and text linguistics to improve writing in bilingual education programs in the USA. Porta Linguarum. Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 5, 139–150.

Martínez Lirola, M. (2007). El nuevo papel del profesor universitario en el proceso de convergencia europeo y su relación con la interacción, la tutoría y el aprendizaje autónomo. Porta Linguarum. Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 7, 31–43.

Martínez Lirola, M. (2013). ''Teaching visual grammar and social issues in an English language course: an example using multimodal texts on immigrant minors from a Spanish newspaper''. In F.J. Díaz Pérez, M.B. Díez–Bedmar, P. García–Ramírez & & D. Rascón–Moreno, (eds.), Global Issues and the Teaching of Language, Literature and Linguistics (pp. 195–215). Viena: Peter Lang.

Martínez Lirola, M. & Crespo, E. (2008). Explorando las variables incidentes en la motivación del alumno de filología inglesa en el ámbito del espacio europeo de educación superior. In G. Merma Molina & F. Pastor Verdú (coords.), Aportaciones curriculares para la interacción en el aprendizaje. Redes de investigación docente–espacio europeo de educación superior. (vol. I, pp. 119–135). Alcoy: Marfil.

Martínez Lirola, M. & Tabuenca Cuevas, M. (2008). Integrating CALL and genre theory: a proposal to increase students' literacy. RECALL, 20(1), 67–81.

Martínez Lirola, M. & Tabuenca Cuevas, M. (2010). Applying genre theory to improve expositiontype essay writing. Porta Linguarum. Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 13, 29–42.

Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2006). Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: exploring the meaningmaking resources of languages systemic–functionally. In H. Byrnes (ed.), Advanced Language Learning. The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 31– 57). London: Routledge.

Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–67.

Moyano, E.I. (2013). (coord.) Aprender ciencias y humanidades: una cuestión de lectura y escritura. Aportes para la construcción de un programa de inclusión social a través de la educación lingüística. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.

O'Brien, T. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 37, 1–28.

Parodi, G. (2010). Written discourse genres. Towards an integral conception from a sociocognitive perspective. In G. Parodi (ed.), Academic and Professional Discourse Genre in Spanish (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Prior, P. (1998). Writing Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rogers, R. (ed.) (2004). An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rose, D. (2005). Democratising the classroom: a literacy pedagogy for the new generation. Journal of Education, 37, 131–167.

Swales, J.M. (2002). On models of applied discourse analysis. In C.N. Candlin (ed.), Research and Practice in Professional Discourse (pp. 61–77). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.

Trofimovich, P. & McDonough, K. (eds.) (2011). Applying Priming Methods to L2 Learning, Teaching and Research. Insights from Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Wennerstrom, A. (2003). Discourse Analysis in the Language Classroom. Vol. 2. Genres of Writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and genrebased models for academic writing instruction: A 'literacy' journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 26–37.