Spanish Adult Students’ Intention- Behaviour Toward MOOCs During the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n3a04Schlagworte:
MOOC, COVID-19, intention-behaviour, students' needs, ICT, EFL, adult students, brief-learning coursesAbstract
Many Spanish students need to learn English beyond the age of 25 to be able to find a job or be further promoted. Unfortunately, those who attempt to pass a university entry-qualifications test often lack the required academic level. To help them achieve this goal, they are usually provided with learning materials and supportive digital resources. During the covid-19 pandemic, the need for online resources increased. This is why the National Distance Education University offered a massive open online course (mooc) on elementary English. The main goal of this contrastive qualitative study was twofold: First, it attempted to explore adult students’ intention-behaviour while taking the course. Secondly it delved into students’ satisfaction with this type of courses during two different years: 2017 and 2020 when the pandemic had a clear impact on distance education. For this purpose, the study used a comprehensive post-questionnaire given at the end of both courses. The data revealed a few significant differences regarding students’ satisfaction, intentions, perceptions, and interests in contexts where face-to-face-learning was not an option. These findings suggest that mooc should be considered as an alternative way to build specific content in situations of crisis.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Anders, A. (2015) Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2185
Bárcena, E. & Read, T. (2015) The role of modularity and mobility in language MOOCs. Verbeia: Journal of English and Spanish Studies, 1, 28–35.
Bárcena, E., Martín-Monje, E., & Read, T. (2015) Potentiating the human dimension in language moocs. Experience Track. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit (pp. 46–54). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Elena-Martin-Monje/publication/340817309_Potentiating_the_human_dimension_in_Language_MOOCs/links/5e9f252ba6fdcca789309f3f/Potentiating-the-human-dimension-in-Language-MOOCs.pdf
Bargh, J. A. (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.336
Baumeister, R. F., & Bargh, J. A. (2014) Conscious and unconscious: Toward an integrative understanding of human mental life and action. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 35–49). Guilford Press.
Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015) Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behaviour, 51, 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013) Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 13–25.
Canole, G. (2016) MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 50(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/2
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. & Mestre Mestre, E. M. (2014). Motivation in second language acquisition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 240-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.201
Castrillo de Larreta Azelain, M. D, Martín-Monje, E. & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2018). Guía práctica para el diseño y tutorización de mooc. Telefónica Educación Digital.
Castrillo de Larreta Azelain, M. D. (2015) Language teaching in MOOCs: The integral role of the instructor. In E. Martín-Monje & E. Bárcena (Eds.), Language moocs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 67–90). De Gruyter Open.
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
Corder, G. W.; Foreman, D. I. (2014). Nonparametric statistics: A step-by-step approach. Wiley.
Escobar M. A. (2020). Developing CLIL in tertiary education: Working with tourism texts. In K. Nalan, E. Isik-Tas, & H. Jian (Eds.), English for specific purposes instruction and research: Current practices, challenges and innovations (pp. 269–288). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32914-3_14
Escobar, M. A; da Cunha, I; Gonzalez-Mingez, M. T.; Luzondo, A. (2020). Curso de inglés para adultos (2a. Ed.). UNED publicaciones.
Escobar, M. A., Ciancio, J., da Cunha, I., & Luzondo, A. (2017). LMOOC: Gramatica inglesa para curso de acceso. https://canal.uned.es/series/5a6f2dbeb1111f347a8b4569
Escobar, M. A., da Cunha, I. (2018). Designing writing materials for tourism text genres through technological tools. In L. Hurajová, G. Chmelíková, & N. Stojkovic (Eds.), Convergence of ESP with other disciplines (pp. 1–18). Vernon Press.
Gil-Jaurena, I., Callejo-Gallejo, J. Agudo, Y. (2017). Evaluation of the UNED MOOCs implementation: Demographics, learner opinions, and completion rates. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3155
Grünewald, F., Meinel, C., Totschnig, M. & Willems, C. (2013). Designing moocs for the support of multiple learning styles. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma y A. Harrer (Eds.), Scaling up learning for sustained impact (pp. 371–382). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_29
Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R. H., Chang, V., & Morales, M. (2014). Attrition in MOOC: Lessons learned from drop-out students. In L. Uden, J. Sinclair, Y.-H. Tao, & D. Liberona (Eds.), Learning technology for education in cloud. MOOC and big data (pp. 37–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4
Hakim, B. (2020). Technology integrated online classrooms and the challenges faced by the EFL teachers in Saudi Arabia during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature; Footscray, 9(5), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.5p.33
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Jung, E., Kim, D., Yoon, M., Park, S., Oakley, B. (2019). The influence of instructional design on learner control, sense of achievement, and perceived effectiveness in a supersize MOOC course. Computers & Education, (128), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.001
Kenny, N., & Escobar, L. (Eds.). (2020). The changing face of esp in today’s classroom and workplace. Vernon Press.
Kenny, N., Isik-Tad, E., & Huang J. (2020). English for specific purposes instruction and research: Current practices, challenges and innovations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32914-3
Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/6/retention-and-intention-in-massive-open-online-courses-in-depth
Kuhl, J. & Quirin, M. (2011). Seven steps toward freedom and two ways to lose it: Overcoming limitations of intentionality through self-confrontational coping with stress. Social Psychology, 42(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000045
Lehmann E. L. (1992). Introduction to Neyman and Pearson (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Breakthroughs in Statistics, 1, Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_5
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Williams, S. A. (2016, January 7). Elderly learners and massive open online courses: A review. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 5(1), el. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.4937
Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P. A., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L. (2017). Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2). https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/889/271
Martín-Monje, E., Bárcena, E. (eds.) (2014). Language moocs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. De Gruyter Open.
Mengual-Andrés, S., & Payà Rico, A. P. (2018). Open educational resources’ impact and outcomes: The essence of open knowledge and its social contribution. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(119). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3667
Pankowska, M. B. (2017). MOOCs as a supplement of informal education. International Journal of E-Adoption, 9(1), 10-25.
Pilli, O. & Admiraal, W. (2016) A. taxonomy of massive open online courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 223-240.
Sheeran, P., & Web T. L. (2016). The intention-behaviour gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2, 3–10. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Thompson, G., & Mckinley, J. (2018). Integration of content and language learning. In J. I. Liontas, M. DelliCarpini, & S. Abrar-ul-Hassan (Eds.), tesol. Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Wiley.
Torres, W. J., & Beier, M. E. (2018) Adult development in the wild: The determinants of autonomous learning in a massive open online course. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 207-217.
Universities UK. (2013). Massive open online courses: Higher education’s digital moment? Author. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2013/massive-open-online-courses.pdf
Walker, T. (2018). ‘Who are our learners? A research based insight into FutureLeaerners’ In N. O’grady (ed.) Newsletter content. Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/info/press/research-insights/learners-part-1
Wedemeyer, C. A. (1973). Characteristics of open learning systems. Report of NAEB advisory committee on open learning systems to NAEB conference. New Orleans, la. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED099593.pdf
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Kategorien
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2021 Íkala
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
