Evaluación de Pares e Interacción en Línea: un Estudio de Caso
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.14519Palabras clave:
colaboración en línea, interacción en línea, coevaluaciónResumen
El uso de tecnologías para la información y la comunicación (TICs) en el campo de enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera ha traído diferentes prácticas y tipos de interacción. La interacción en línea permite que estudiantes y docentes utilicen la lengua extranjera en ambientes externos al aula de clase y brinda a sus participantes más tiempo de contacto con el idioma. Este estudio de caso buscaba entender cómo un grupo de doce estudiantes de la Universidad de la Sabana, quienes participaron en foros virtuales como parte de un requisito de una de sus clases de inglés, interactuaron de manera virtual brindando una retroalimentación a los trabajos escritos de sus compañeros. De la misma forma, buscaba analizar cómo esta interacción virtual tomaba lugar al usar foros. Los resultados sugieren que al realizar procesos de coevaluación, los participantes generan conciencia de la relevancia del proceso de edición de escritos de sus compañeros y revela la percepción que los estudiantes tienen con relación al proceso de evaluación.
Descargas
Citas
Anderson, T. & Kanuka, H. (1997). On-line forums: New platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3), 0-0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00078.x
Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An Empirical Verification of the Community of Inquiry Framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73-85.
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009). Assessing online collaboration among language teachers: A cross-institutional case study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 121-139.
Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from 'media richness theory' perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1-22.
Bates, A.W. (1997). The impact of technological change on open and distance learning. Distance Education, 18(1), 93-109.
Behrent, S., Doff, S., Marx, N., & Ziegler, G. (2011). Review of doctoral research in second language acquisition in Germany (2006-2009). Language Teaching, 44(2), 237-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000455
Canclini, N. G. (2003). A globalização imaginada. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Editora Iluminuras Ltda.
Cantoni, V., Cellario, M., & Porta, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: Towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 15(5), 333-345.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & I. Lincoln, (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2007). Using Moodle: teaching with the popular open source course management system. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Incorporated.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated.
Cummins, J. (2008). Technology, literacy, and young second language learners. In L. Parker. (Ed.). Technology-mediated learning environments for young English learners. (pp. 61-98). New York, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Raadt, M., Toleman, M., & Watson, R. (2005). Electronic peer review: A large cohort teaching themselves?. In Proceedings ASCILITE 2005: 22nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Balance, Fidelity, Mobility- Maintaining the Momentum? (Vol. 1, pp. 159-168). Queensland University of Technology, Teaching and Learning Support Services.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. London, England: Lawrence Erlbawm Associates Publishers.
Espitia, M. I., & Clavijo Olarte, A. (2011). Virtual forums: A pedagogical tool for collaboration and learning in teacher education. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(2), 29-42.
Espitia, M.I., & Kwinta, A. (2013). ''Buddy System'': A pedagogical innovation to promote online interaction. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 15(1), 207-221.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 7-24.
Kahiigi, E. K., Vesisenaho, M., Hansson, H., Danielson, M., & Tusubira, F. F. (2012). Modelling a peer assignment review process for collaborative e-learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(2).
Karacapilidis, N., & Papadias, D. (2001). Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information Systems, 26(4), 259-277.
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. Tesol Quarterly. 40 (1), 183-205.
Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226-246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000110
Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning– parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(02), 163-178.
Nunan, D. (2001), English as a global language. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 605–606. doi:10.2307/3588436
Olivares, O. (2009). Collaborative vs. cooperative learning: The instructor's role in computer supported collaborative learning. In N. Kock (Ed.), E-Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 129-141). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/ 978-1-60566-652-5.ch011
O'Dowd, R. (2011). Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education? Language Teaching, 44(3), 368-380. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000194
Orvis, K. L., & Lassiter, A. L. (2008). Computer- supported collaborative learning: Best practices and principles for instructors (pp. 1-352). doi:10.4018/ 978-1-59904-753-9
Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265.
Picón, É. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through teacher-student partnership assessment in an American high school: A cycle of action research. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 145-162
Rojas, G. (2011). Writing using blogs: A way to engage Colombian adolescents in meaningful communication. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 13(2), 11-27.
Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. London, England: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.
Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366.
Thorne, S. L. (2008). Computer-Mediated Communication. In N. Hornberger, & N. Van Duesen-Scholl (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education (pp. 325-336). New York, NJ: Springer/Kluwer.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Warschauer, M. (1995). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Yang, Y. F., & Wu, S. P. (2011). A collective case study of online interaction patterns in text revisions. Supporting Organizations, 1.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2013 Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
