Évaluation par des Pairs et Interaction en Ligne : une Étude de Cas
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.14519Mots-clés :
collaboration en ligne, interaction en ligne, co-évaluationRésumé
L'utilisation des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) dans le domaine de l'enseignement de l'anglais langue étrangère a apporté différentes pratiques et types d'interaction. L'interaction en ligne permet aux élèves et aux enseignants d'utiliser la langue étrangère dans des environnements extérieurs à la salle de classe et donne aux participants la possibilité de passer plus de temps en contact avec la langue. Cette étude de cas visait à comprendre comment un groupe de douze étudiants de l'Université de la Sabana, qui ont participé à des forums virtuels comme exigence de l'un de leurs cours d'anglais, ont interagi virtuellement en fournissant des commentaires sur le travail écrit de leurs camarades de classe. De la même manière, l’objectif était d’analyser comment cette interaction virtuelle avait eu lieu lors de l'utilisation des forums. Les résultats suggèrent qu'en effectuant des processus de co-évaluation, les participants prennent conscience de la pertinence du processus d’édition des écrits de leurs camarades et révèlent la perception du processus d'évaluation par les étudiants.
Téléchargements
Références
Anderson, T. & Kanuka, H. (1997). On-line forums: New platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3), 0-0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00078.x
Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An Empirical Verification of the Community of Inquiry Framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73-85.
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009). Assessing online collaboration among language teachers: A cross-institutional case study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 121-139.
Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from 'media richness theory' perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1-22.
Bates, A.W. (1997). The impact of technological change on open and distance learning. Distance Education, 18(1), 93-109.
Behrent, S., Doff, S., Marx, N., & Ziegler, G. (2011). Review of doctoral research in second language acquisition in Germany (2006-2009). Language Teaching, 44(2), 237-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000455
Canclini, N. G. (2003). A globalização imaginada. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Editora Iluminuras Ltda.
Cantoni, V., Cellario, M., & Porta, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: Towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 15(5), 333-345.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & I. Lincoln, (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2007). Using Moodle: teaching with the popular open source course management system. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Incorporated.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated.
Cummins, J. (2008). Technology, literacy, and young second language learners. In L. Parker. (Ed.). Technology-mediated learning environments for young English learners. (pp. 61-98). New York, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Raadt, M., Toleman, M., & Watson, R. (2005). Electronic peer review: A large cohort teaching themselves?. In Proceedings ASCILITE 2005: 22nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Balance, Fidelity, Mobility- Maintaining the Momentum? (Vol. 1, pp. 159-168). Queensland University of Technology, Teaching and Learning Support Services.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. London, England: Lawrence Erlbawm Associates Publishers.
Espitia, M. I., & Clavijo Olarte, A. (2011). Virtual forums: A pedagogical tool for collaboration and learning in teacher education. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(2), 29-42.
Espitia, M.I., & Kwinta, A. (2013). ''Buddy System'': A pedagogical innovation to promote online interaction. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 15(1), 207-221.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 7-24.
Kahiigi, E. K., Vesisenaho, M., Hansson, H., Danielson, M., & Tusubira, F. F. (2012). Modelling a peer assignment review process for collaborative e-learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(2).
Karacapilidis, N., & Papadias, D. (2001). Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information Systems, 26(4), 259-277.
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. Tesol Quarterly. 40 (1), 183-205.
Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226-246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000110
Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning– parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(02), 163-178.
Nunan, D. (2001), English as a global language. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 605–606. doi:10.2307/3588436
Olivares, O. (2009). Collaborative vs. cooperative learning: The instructor's role in computer supported collaborative learning. In N. Kock (Ed.), E-Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 129-141). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/ 978-1-60566-652-5.ch011
O'Dowd, R. (2011). Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education? Language Teaching, 44(3), 368-380. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000194
Orvis, K. L., & Lassiter, A. L. (2008). Computer- supported collaborative learning: Best practices and principles for instructors (pp. 1-352). doi:10.4018/ 978-1-59904-753-9
Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265.
Picón, É. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through teacher-student partnership assessment in an American high school: A cycle of action research. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 145-162
Rojas, G. (2011). Writing using blogs: A way to engage Colombian adolescents in meaningful communication. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 13(2), 11-27.
Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. London, England: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.
Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366.
Thorne, S. L. (2008). Computer-Mediated Communication. In N. Hornberger, & N. Van Duesen-Scholl (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education (pp. 325-336). New York, NJ: Springer/Kluwer.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Warschauer, M. (1995). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Yang, Y. F., & Wu, S. P. (2011). A collective case study of online interaction patterns in text revisions. Supporting Organizations, 1.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 2013
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
