CIPP Model–based Context Evaluation on an English Language Reading Comprehension Course at a Public University in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v20n3a02Keywords:
program evaluation, CIPP evaluation model, foreign language policyAbstract
This article reports the results of a context evaluation made to the reading comprehension program at Universidad de Antioquia. This program evaluation used the CIPP model (context, input, process, product) proposed by Daniel Stufflebeam (1983, 1993, 2000), and it was framed in a mixed–methods study. Qualitative and quantitative data collection was made using methods, such as questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews, and it was obtained from students, teachers, and administrators of the program and the university. Data analysis was done using the free software R and the qualitative analysis software NVivo 9. Findings indicated a global state of the program, its strengths, weaknesses which constituted the most striking aspect of the program, as well as needs and possibilities. These findings led to recommendations for decisive actions for restructuring the program and foreign language policy in the university.
Downloads
References
Bausela Herreras, E. (2003). Metodología de la investigación evaluativa: modelo CIPP. Revista Complutense de Educación, 14(2), 361–376.
Brown James D. (1995). Language program evaluation: decisions: problems and solutions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 227–248.
Consejo Nacional de Acreditación. (2003). Lineamientos para la acreditación de programas. Bogotá: CNA.
Consejo Nacional de Acreditación. (1998). La evaluación externa en el contexto de la acreditación en Colombia. Bogotá, CNA.
Correa Uribe, S., Puerta Zapata, A. & Restrepo Gómez, B. (1996). Investigación evaluativa. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior, ICFES. Recuperado de http://web.unap.edu.pe/web/sites/default/files/Investigacionevaluativa.pdf
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd. ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.
Jung, S. K. & Norton, B. (2002). Language planning in Korea: The new elementary English program. En J. W. Tollefson (ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 245–266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kiely, R. & Rea–Dickins P. (2005). Program Evaluation in Language Education. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Mora Vargas, A. I. (2004). La evaluación educativa: concepto, periodos y modelos. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 4(2), 1–28.
Pérez Juste, R. (1993). Evaluación de programas sociales. Documento policopiado.
Ruiz, J. (2004). Cómo hacer una evaluación de centros educativos. España: Narcea.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1983). The CIPP model for evaluation. En G.F Madaus. M. Scriven, & D.L. Stufflebeam (eds.). Evaluation Models (pp. 117–141). Norwell, M.A: Kluwer
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. En D.L Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus y T. Kellaghan (eds.), Evaluation models (2nd. ed.), (pp. 279–317). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. En T. Kellaghan (ed.). International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Stufflebeam, D. L. y Shinkfield, A. J. (1993). Evaluación sistemática. España: Paidós,
Stufflebeam, D., & Shinkfield, A. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Urbano Canal, N. (2007, julio–diciembre). Efectos de la implementación del modelo colombiano de acreditación de programas académicos. Un análisis a partir del caso de programas tecnológicos. Universitas Humanística, (64), 139–161.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Íkala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
