Reading in Distracting Settings: The Role of Inhibition and Setting Goals in the Comprehension of Digital Academic Texts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a04Keywords:
reading comprehension, distracting contexts, higher education, goal setting, inhibition, digital academic textsAbstract
Written texts are the main tool for accessing disciplinary knowledge in higher education. Nowadays, reading tasks are frequently developed by means of digital texts, which implies a reading environment susceptible to distraction, requiring a reader capable of controlling key cognitive processes in order to adequately understand the content. This article reports the results of an experimental pilot study which aimed to analyze the effect of two executive functions: The ability to inhibit in the face of a distracting stimulus and the ability to set goals, on the comprehension of digital academic texts. For this purpose, the technique of recording eye movements during reading was used. Thirty-nine Psychology students attending the first and second years at a Chilean university participated in the test. The results revealed that, in contexts of distraction, setting goals based on relevant instructions improves the comprehension of digital academic texts. Findings suggest that in these reading situations clear instructions are associated with a focused and efficient processing of the text, which in turn reduces the negative effect on comprehension from elements outside the task.
Downloads
References
Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (ef) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724
Annerer-Walcher, S., Korner, C., Beaty, R. E. y Benedek, M. (2020). Eye behavior predicts susceptibility to visual distraction during internally directed cognition. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 3432-3444. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02068-1
Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M. y Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.902461
Balluerka, N. y Vergara, A. I. (2002). Diseños de investigación experimental en psicología. Pearson.
Borella, E., Carreti, B. y Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371676
Borella, E. y de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001
Canet-Juric, L., Burin, D., Andrés, M. L. y Urquijo, S. (2013). Perfil cognitivo de niños con bajos rendimientos en comprensión lectora. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 996-1005. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.138221
Canet-Juric, L., Urquijo, S., Richard’s, M. y Burin, D. (2009). Predictores cognitivos de niveles de comprensión lectora mediante análisis discriminante. International Journal of Psychological Research, 2(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.865
Cerdán, R., Marín, M. y Candel, C. (2013). The role of perspective on students’ use of multiple documents to solve an open-ended task. Psicología Educativa, 19(2), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-755X(13)70015-0
Cerdán, R., Pérez, A., Vidal-Abarca, E. y Rouet, J. F. (2019). To answer questions from text, one has to understand what the question is asking: Differential effects of question aids as a function of comprehension skill. Reading and Writing, 32, 2111-2124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09943-w
De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F. y Cornoldi, C. (1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755761
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R. y Salmeron, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Demagistri, M. S., Richards, M. M. y Canet Juric, L. (2014). Incidence of executive functions on reading comprehension performance in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(2), 343-370. https:// doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.33.13146
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Follmer, D. J. (2017). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295
Friedman, N. P. y Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
Friedman, N. P. y Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023
Georgiou, G. y Das, J .P. (2016). What component of executive functions contributes to normal and impaired reading comprehension in young adults? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49(50), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.001
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4(5), 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00567.x
Gaspelin, N. y Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
Jian, Y.-C. (2018). Reading instructions facilitate signaling effect on science text for young readers: An eye-movement study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9878-y
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
León, J. A., Moreno, J. D., Escudero, I., Olmos, R., Ruiz, M. y Lorch, R. (2019). Specific relevance instructions promote selective reading strategies: Evidences from eye tracking and oral summaries. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12276
McCrudden, M. (2011). Do specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing? Instructional Science, 39(6), 865-879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9158-x
McCrudden, M. y Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
Parodi, G., Moreno-de-León, T. y Julio, C. (2020). Comprensión de textos escritos: reconceptualizaciones en torno a las demandas del siglo xxi. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(3), 775-795. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n03a10
Piovano, S., Irrazabal, N. y Burin, D. I. (2018). Comprensión de textos expositivos académicos en e-book Reader y en papel: influencia del conocimiento previo de dominio y la aptitud verbal. Ciencias Psicológicas, 12(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v12i2.1680
Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J. y Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8- to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: The role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415613080
Ramírez-Peña, P. (2020). Funciones ejecutivas y comprensión de textos académicos en estudiantes de primer año [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Concepción]. http://repositorio.udec.cl/xmlui/handle/11594/4667
Rapp, D. N. y McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Relevance before, during, and after discourse experiences. In A. Schüller-Zwierlein (Ed.), Relevance and irrelevance: Theories, factors and challenges (pp. 141-160). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472509-007
Riffo, B., Véliz, M., Reyes, F., Castro, G., Reyes, A. y Campos, D. (2013). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Desarrollo de un instrumento basado en un modelo psicolingüístico. Universidad de Concepción.
Roldán, L. A. (2016). Inhibición y actualización en comprensión de textos: una revisión. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-2.iact
Rozek, E., Kemper, S. y McDowd, J. (2012). Learning to ignore distracters. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025578
Salmerón, L. y Delgado, P. (2019). Critical analysis of the effects of the digital technologies on reading and learning / Análisis crítico sobre los efectos de las tecnologías digitales en la lectura y el aprendizaje. Culture and Education, 31(3), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1630958
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding. Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. rand Corporation.
Véliz, M., Riffo, B. y Salazar, O. (2013a). Lectum 7. Prueba de comprensión lectora, forma A. Universidad de Concepción.
Véliz, M., Riffo, B. y Salazar, O. (2013b). Lectum 7. Prueba de comprensión lectora, forma B. Universidad de Concepción.
Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J. y Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336632
Vidal-Abarca, E., Salmeron, L. y Mañá, A. (2011). Individual differences in task-oriented reading. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano y G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 267-293). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Mardanbegi, D., Sawyer, P., Gellerser, H., Xia, B. Q. y Crawford, T. J. (2019). Oculomotor and inhibitory control in dyslexia. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00066
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
