Reading in Distracting Settings: The Role of Inhibition and Setting Goals in the Comprehension of Digital Academic Texts




reading comprehension, distracting contexts, higher education, goal setting, inhibition, digital academic texts


Written texts are the main tool for accessing disciplinary knowledge in higher education. Nowadays, reading tasks are frequently developed by means of digital texts, which implies a reading environment susceptible to distraction, requiring a reader capable of controlling key cognitive processes in order to adequately understand the content. This article reports the results of an experimental pilot study which aimed to analyze the effect of two executive functions: The ability to inhibit in the face of a distracting stimulus and the ability to set goals, on the comprehension of digital academic texts. For this purpose, the technique of recording eye movements during reading was used. Thirty-nine Psychology students attending the first and second years at a Chilean university participated in the test. The results revealed that, in contexts of distraction, setting goals based on relevant instructions improves the comprehension of digital academic texts. Findings suggest that in these reading situations clear instructions are associated with a focused and efficient processing of the text, which in turn reduces the negative effect on comprehension from elements outside the task.

= 497 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 21 veces| | VISOR (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 4 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 321 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pamela Ramírez-Peña, Universidad de Concepción

Ph. D. Psychology. Scholarly Assistant, Department of Spanish/School of Education, Universidad de Concepción, Chile.

Claudia Paz Pérez-Salas, Universidad de Concepción

Profesora asociada, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

Bernardo Riffo-Ocares, Universidad de Concepción, Chile

Profesor titular, Departamento de Español, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

Raquel Cerdán Otero, Universidad de Valencia, España

Profesora titular, ERI Lectura (Estructura de Investigación en Lectura), Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España.


Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (ef) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71-82.

Annerer-Walcher, S., Korner, C., Beaty, R. E. y Benedek, M. (2020). Eye behavior predicts susceptibility to visual distraction during internally directed cognition. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 3432-3444.

Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M. y Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325-346.

Balluerka, N. y Vergara, A. I. (2002). Diseños de investigación experimental en psicología. Pearson.

Borella, E., Carreti, B. y Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541-552.

Borella, E. y de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 86-92.

Canet-Juric, L., Burin, D., Andrés, M. L. y Urquijo, S. (2013). Perfil cognitivo de niños con bajos rendimientos en comprensión lectora. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 996-1005.

Canet-Juric, L., Urquijo, S., Richard’s, M. y Burin, D. (2009). Predictores cognitivos de niveles de comprensión lectora mediante análisis discriminante. International Journal of Psychological Research, 2(2), 99-111.

Cerdán, R., Marín, M. y Candel, C. (2013). The role of perspective on students’ use of multiple documents to solve an open-ended task. Psicología Educativa, 19(2), 89-94.

Cerdán, R., Pérez, A., Vidal-Abarca, E. y Rouet, J. F. (2019). To answer questions from text, one has to understand what the question is asking: Differential effects of question aids as a function of comprehension skill. Reading and Writing, 32, 2111-2124.

De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F. y Cornoldi, C. (1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 305-320.

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R. y Salmeron, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38. https//

Demagistri, M. S., Richards, M. M. y Canet Juric, L. (2014). Incidence of executive functions on reading comprehension performance in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(2), 343-370. https://

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.

Follmer, D. J. (2017). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42-60.

Friedman, N. P. y Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101-135.

Friedman, N. P. y Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204.

Georgiou, G. y Das, J .P. (2016). What component of executive functions contributes to normal and impaired reading comprehension in young adults? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49(50), 118-128.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4(5), 294-298.

Gaspelin, N. y Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79-92.

Jian, Y.-C. (2018). Reading instructions facilitate signaling effect on science text for young readers: An eye-movement study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 503-522.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.

León, J. A., Moreno, J. D., Escudero, I., Olmos, R., Ruiz, M. y Lorch, R. (2019). Specific relevance instructions promote selective reading strategies: Evidences from eye tracking and oral summaries. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 432-453.

McCrudden, M. (2011). Do specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing? Instructional Science, 39(6), 865-879.

McCrudden, M. y Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-139.

Parodi, G., Moreno-de-León, T. y Julio, C. (2020). Comprensión de textos escritos: reconceptualizaciones en torno a las demandas del siglo xxi. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(3), 775-795.

Piovano, S., Irrazabal, N. y Burin, D. I. (2018). Comprensión de textos expositivos académicos en e-book Reader y en papel: influencia del conocimiento previo de dominio y la aptitud verbal. Ciencias Psicológicas, 12(2), 177-185.

Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J. y Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8- to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: The role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128-42.

Ramírez-Peña, P. (2020). Funciones ejecutivas y comprensión de textos académicos en estudiantes de primer año [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Concepción].

Rapp, D. N. y McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Relevance before, during, and after discourse experiences. In A. Schüller-Zwierlein (Ed.), Relevance and irrelevance: Theories, factors and challenges (pp. 141-160). De Gruyter Saur.

Riffo, B., Véliz, M., Reyes, F., Castro, G., Reyes, A. y Campos, D. (2013). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Desarrollo de un instrumento basado en un modelo psicolingüístico. Universidad de Concepción.

Roldán, L. A. (2016). Inhibición y actualización en comprensión de textos: una revisión. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 87-96.

Rozek, E., Kemper, S. y McDowd, J. (2012). Learning to ignore distracters. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 61-66.

Salmerón, L. y Delgado, P. (2019). Critical analysis of the effects of the digital technologies on reading and learning / Análisis crítico sobre los efectos de las tecnologías digitales en la lectura y el aprendizaje. Culture and Education, 31(3), 465-480.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding. Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. rand Corporation.

Véliz, M., Riffo, B. y Salazar, O. (2013a). Lectum 7. Prueba de comprensión lectora, forma A. Universidad de Concepción.

Véliz, M., Riffo, B. y Salazar, O. (2013b). Lectum 7. Prueba de comprensión lectora, forma B. Universidad de Concepción.

Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J. y Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 3-32.

Vidal-Abarca, E., Salmeron, L. y Mañá, A. (2011). Individual differences in task-oriented reading. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano y G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 267-293). Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Wilcockson, T. D. W., Mardanbegi, D., Sawyer, P., Gellerser, H., Xia, B. Q. y Crawford, T. J. (2019). Oculomotor and inhibitory control in dyslexia. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 12.



How to Cite

Ramírez-Peña, P., Pérez-Salas, . C. P., Riffo-Ocares, . B., & Cerdán Otero, . R. (2022). Reading in Distracting Settings: The Role of Inhibition and Setting Goals in the Comprehension of Digital Academic Texts. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 27(1), 66–83.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.