Academic writing for the development of pedagogical reflection in teacher education: a Chronicle Teacher-Headmaster

Marcela Jarpa-Azagra

doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a04

Autor/innen

Marcela Jarpa-Azagra Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a04

Schlagworte:

academic writing, pedagogical reflexión genre, genre of pedagogy, pedagogical knowledge, rhetorical move

Abstract

The paper presents the main results of an action research that had as its axis the de-sign and implementation of a teaching module of academic writing to promote the development of teacher professional reflection in a postgraduate education program in a Chilean university. The aim was to define and characterize a new academic genre of pedagogical reflection that allowed the development of an epistemic writing to enhance the pedagogical knowledge of teachers. The methodological design of this research contemplated a theoretical-practical and longitudinal approach that allowed the participation of 160 teachers and the formation of a corpus of analysis of 160 texts collected in a period of 5 years. Among the main results, we highlight, firstly, the creation of a kind of teacher reflection that we have called Chronicle Teaching-Directive that allows a deep analysis of the practice from the rhetorical organization of the moves. Secondly, the design and implementation of a didactic sequence based on the pedagogy of the genre that allows the scaffolding and the development of reflexive writing as a professional resource that potentiates teacher’s knowledge is highlighted. A relevant conclusion is that the modeling and scaffolding process of this genre allows us to improve not only the communicative competences of the teachers but also the depth of the pedagogical reflection, achieving the construction and consolidation of the teaching knowledge of each of the participating teachers.

|Abstract

= 874 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 494 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 103 veces|

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Autor/innen-Biografie

Marcela Jarpa-Azagra, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

Director of the Pedagogy in Basic education program, associate professor in the pedagogy school.

Literaturhinweise

Adam, JM. (1990). Elements de linguistique textualle.Theorie et pratique de l´analyse textualle. Lieja: Mardaga.

Anderson, L. & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre-language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bazerman, Ch. (2004), “Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People.” en Ch. Bazerman & P. Prior, What writing does and how it does it. An Introduction to Analyzing texts and textual practice, London, LEA, pp. 309 -340.

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987), The Psychology of Written Composition, Hillsdale, Erlbaum.

Bermúdez, N. (2009). Escritura y Producción de Conocimiento en las carreras de postgrado. Santiago: Arcos.

Carless, D. (2015). La confianza: facilitar el feedback dialógico. En D. Boud & E. Molloy (Coords.). El Feedback en educación superior y profesional. Comprenderlo y hacerlo bien.(pp.-115-129). Madrid: Narcea.

Cotos, E; Huffman, S & Link, S. (2017). A move/stpe model for methods sections: demonstratong Rigor and Credibility. English for Specific Purpose, (46), 90-106.

Chaisiri, T. (2010), “Implementing a Genre Pedagogy to the teaching writing in a University Context in Thailand”, Language Education in Asia, Vol 1, pp. 181-199.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Power teacher education. Lessons form Exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossley Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Educar con calidad y equidad. Los dilemas del siglo XX. Santiago: Centro de Innovación en Educación de Fundación Chile.

Elliott, J. (1993). El cambio educativo desde la investigación-acción. Madrid: Morata.

Grijelmo, A. (2017). La Gramática descomplicada. Barcelona: Taurus.

Hatton, N. & Smith, D. (1995), “Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and implementation”, Teaching & Teacher Education, vol 11, nº 1, pp. 33-49.

Hyland, K. (2003), “Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process”, Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 12, nº1, pp. 17-29.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007) 148–164.

Jarpa, M. (2012), Macrogénero Académico Evaluativo: Descripción retórica en la comunidad de aprendizaje de postgrado en Biotecnología, Tesis doctorado, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile.

Jarpa, M. (2014). Macrogénero Académico Evaluativo Descripción retórica de los Géneros Académicos Evaluativos en una comunidad de aprendizaje de postgrado, Alemania, Publicia.

Jay, J. & Johson, K. (2002), “Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol 18, nº 1, pp. 73-85.

Jolly, B & Boud, D. (2015). El feedback por escrito. Para qué sirve y cómo podemos hacerlo bien. En D. Boud & E. Molloy (Coords.). El Feedback en educación superior y profesional. Comprenderlo y hacerlo bien.(pp.-131-154). Madrid: Narcea.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Introduction to move analysis. En D. Biber, U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move. (pp 23-41). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kemmis, S. & Mctaggart, R. (1988), ¿Cómo planificar la investigación-acción? Barcelona: Laertes.

Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse - The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Londres: Arnold.

Korthagen, F. (2004), “In search of essence of a good teacher. Towards a more holistic approach to teacher education”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol 20, nº11, pp. 77-97.

Lewin, K. (1973), “Action research and minority problems”. en Kurt Lewin (Ed.), Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics, London, Souvenir Press, pp. 201-216.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2000). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.

Schön, Donald (1998), El profesional reflexivo: cómo piensan los profesionales cuando actúan, Paidós Ibérica, Barcelona.

Parr, J & Hawe, E. (2014).Assessment for Learning in the writing classroom: an incomplete realization. The Curriculum Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.862172.

Quinteros, J; Torres, F. y Cardona, M. (2007), “El maestro escribe su saber y su hacer”, Lenguaje, vol. 35, nº 1, pp. 279-300.

Starks, D; Nicholas, H & Macdonald, S.(2012), “Structured Reflective Communication as a Meta-Genre in Teacher Education: Creative Uses of Critique in a Teacher Education Program”, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol.37, nº 3, pp. 90-111.

Thaiss, C & Myers, T, (2006), Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life, Boynton/Cook, Heinemann Press.

Yinger, R & Clark, C. (1981), Reflective Journal Writing: Theory and Practice, USA, Institute for Research on Teaching Accessed.

Venegas, R; Núñez, M; Zamora, S & Santana, A. (2015). Escribir desde la Pedagogía del Género. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitaria de Valparaíso.

Villalobos, J. & de Cabrera, C (2009), “Los docentes y su necesidad de ejercer una práctica reflexiva”, Revista de Teoría y Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales, nº14, pp. 139-166.

Williamson, G. (2002). Investigación acción participativa intercultural en comunidades educacionales y locales, Temuco: Universidad de La Frontera/Proyecto Kelluwün

Zuluaga, O. & Echeverri, A. (2003), “El florecimiento de las investigaciones pedagógicas”. en Pedagogía y Epistemología, Bogotá: Grupo Historia de Práctica Pedagógica - Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio, pp. 57-80.