Linguistic Discrimination in an English Language Teaching Program: Voices of the Invisible Others
This descriptive research provides insight into how linguistic discrimination influences students’ academic performance in the English teaching program at Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó in Medellin. Five groups were observed on four different occasions to accomplish the purpose of the study. Four professors and twelve students were interviewed to find out what attitudes and beliefs emerged inside the classroom. The analysis of data showed that standard language, native-speaker idealization, pressure from the professor, disesteem of one’s own language-level, and discriminatory attitudes affected students’ performance in aspects such as socio-affective factors, fear of negative evaluation, communication apprehension, devaluation of students’ language variation, academic performance homogenization, mother-tongue restriction, extra visibility of high-proficiency students, discriminatory jokes, linguistic segregation, difficulty in interaction, and self-isolation. This study concluded that academic performance is affected by all types of discriminating attitudes, either in professors or classmates. Discriminatory attitudes trigger responses such as fear, segregation, anxiety, and apprehension, among others, thereby restraining and limiting class participation, quality of interaction, new concept and knowledge appropriation, motivation towards language, and course
Adreou, G. & Galantomus, I. (2009). The native speaker ideal in foreign language teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(2), 200-208.
Akar-Vural, R., & Gömleksiz, M. (2010). Us and others: a study on prospective classroom teachers’ discriminatory attitudes. Egitim Arastirmalari- Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 216-233.
Aravena, M.; Kimelman, E.; Micheli, B.; Torrealba, R. & Zúniga, J. (2006). Investigación Educativa I. University of Arcis, Chile. Retrieved from http://jrvargas.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/investigacion-educativa.pdf
Arhar, J., Holly, M. & Kasten, W. (2001). Action Research for Teachers: Travelling the Yellow Brick Road. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Barker, C. (2011). An introduction to cultural studies. In Willis, P. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications. Retrieved from: http://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/66910_An_Introduction_to_Cultural_Studies.pdf
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Canada’s Ministry of Education (2008). Making Space. Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice throughout the K-12 Curriculum (pp. 1-18). Canada: GT Publishing Services. Columbia University (n.d). Respecting individual difference. [PDF document] Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/tat/pdfs/indiv_difference.pdf
Derwing, T. & Munro, M. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Lang. Teach., 42(4), 476-490.
Dornyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31, 117- 135. Retrieved from http://web.iaincirebon.ac.id/ebook/indrya/Motivation/1998-dornyei-lt.pdf
Du, X., (2009). The affective filter in second language teaching. Asian Social Science, 5(8), 162-165. Retrieved from http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/3429/3106.
Fandino, Y. (2010). Explicit teaching of socio-affective language learning strategies of beginner EFL students. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura. 15(24), 148-151.
Farrel, T. & Martin S. (2009). To teach standard English or world Englishes? A balanced approach to instruction. English Teaching Forum, 2, 2-7. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ923448.pdf
Francois, Grin. (2005). Linguistic human rights as a source of policy guidelines: A critical assessment. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 448-460.
Freeman D. & Freeman Y. (2001). Between Worlds: Access to second language acquisition. Porstmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gamboa, R. (2011). El papel de la teoría crítica en la investigación educativa y cualitativa. Revista Electrónica Diálogos Educativos, 21. Retrieved from dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3931278.pdf
Gardner, R.C. & Macintyre, P.D. (1993). A student’s contributions to second-language learning: Part II. Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5348479/A_students_contributions_to_second_language_learning._Part_II_Affective_variables
Guerrero, C. & Quintero, A. (2009). English as a Neutral Language in the Colombian National Standards: A Constituent of Dominance in English Language Education. Profile, 11(2), 135-150.
Irving, M. & Terry N. P. (2010). Cultural and linguistic diversity: Issues in education. In Colarusso, R. & O’Rourke. Special Education for all teachers (pp.109-132) (5th. ed.). Georgia State University, GA: Kendall Hunt.
Kincheloe, J. & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 303-342) (3rd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2004). Accent without attitude. Multicultural Forum, 15(1), 1-3. Retrieved from: http://www.bkumaravadivelu.com/oped%20pdfs/Accent%20without%20attitude.pdf
Leung, C. Harris, R. & Rampton, B. (1997). The idealised native speaker. Reified ethnicities, and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 543-560.
Lin, Angel Mei Yin (2008, May-August). “Cambios de paradigma en la ensenanza del inglés como lengua extranjera: el cambio crítico y más allá,” Revista Educación y Pedagogía. Medellín, Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Educación, 20(51), 11-23.
Lippi-Green, R. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discrimination pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23, 163-198.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge. Retrieved from ww.researchgate.net/.../02e7e52a962a7d7941000000.
McAninch, A. (1999). More or less acceptable case analyses: A pragmatist approach. In R. F. McNergney, E. R. Ducharme, & M. K. Ducharme (Eds.), Educating for Democracy: Case-method Teaching and Learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacMath, S. (2008). Implementing a democratic pedagogy in the classroom: putting Dewey into practice. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 1, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.cjnse-rcjce.ca/ojs2/index.php/cjnse/article/view/16/13
Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who’s worth more? ELT Journal, 46(4), 349. Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. English Language Teaching Journal, 51(2), 144-156. Retrieved from http://22.214.171.124/ELT/files/51-2-6.pdf
Phillipson, R. (1992). ELT: the native speaker’s burden? ELT Journal, 46(1), 11-19.
Sierra, Z. (2003). Diversidad cultural: desafío a la pedagogía. Desafíos, 9, 38-70.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. (1994). Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1988). Multilingualism and the education of minority children (pp. 9-44). In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & J. Cummins (eds.), Minority Education: From Shame to Struggle. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
UNESCO. (1996). Universal Declaration on Human Rights. World Conference on Linguistic Rights. Barcelona, Spain: UNESCO.
Copyright (c) 2016 Íkala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors that publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
Share alike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.