Reading to Learn and EFL Students’ Construction of Spoken Biographical Recounts
Keywords:spoken discourse, systemic functional linguistics, Reading to Learn, biographical recounts, genre-based instruction, EFL
Reading to Learn (R2L) is a genre-based pedagogical model that has been used worldwide for promoting student literacy in L1 and L2 contexts. Despite its increasing popularity, very few studies have reported how R2L can be used to support learners’ spoken communication in foreign language classrooms. This article reports the results of a qualitative study that explored how a rural-school teacher of efl used this model to support ninth graders’ understanding and production of spoken biographical recounts. Findings revealed that learners’ spoken meaningmaking potential increased during the R2L lessons, both in terms of the amount of new content students conveyed throughout the stages and phases of the genre and in connection with the variety of lexico-grammatical resources learners used. Findings also revealed that the teacher’s use of metalanguage, both verbally and represented in a diagram, became a key scaffold in students’ independent construction of biographical recounts. The study underscores the value of this pedagogy for promoting spoken discourse in efl classrooms.
Achugar, M. (2003). Academic registers in Spanish in the US: A study of oral texts produced by bilingual speakers in a university graduate program. Mi lengua: Spanish as a heritage language in the United States, 213-234.
Achugar, M., & Carpenter, B. D. (2012). Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education, 23(3), 262-276.
Banks, P (2000). Measuring student performance in casual conversation. In H. Joice (Ed), Teachers’ voices 6:Teaching casual conversation. Sidney. Macquarie.
Becerra, T., Herazo, J., García, P., Sagre, A., & Díaz, L. (2019). Using Reading to Learn for EFL students’ reading of explanations. ELT Journal. doi:10.1093/elt/ccz053
Benedict, L. (2006). Genre-based teaching and Vygotskian principles in EFL: The case of a university writing course. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 226-248.
Benítez, T., Barletta, N., Chamorro, D., Mizuno, J., & Moss, G. (2018). Reading and writing across the curriculum. In Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 249-268). Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Brisk, M., & de Rosa, M. (2014). Young writers’ attempts at making meaning through complex sentence structures while writing a variety of genres. In L. de Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 8-24). Bristol, CT: Equinox.
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M. (2010). Main Text. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 1-202.
Christie, F. (2004). Systemic functional linguistics and a theory of language in education. Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, (46), 013-040.
de Oliveira, L., & Iddings, J. (2014). Genre pedagogy across the curriculum. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring How Texts Work. NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
Derewianka, B. (2003). ʻTrends and Issues in Genre-based Approachesʼ. RELC Journal. 34.2. 133-54. London: Continuum.
Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J. R. (2016). Genre pedagogy in higher education: The SLATE project. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Roehr, K. (2011). Use of L1, metalanguage, and discourse markers: L2 learners' regulation during individual task performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 297-318. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00274.x
Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W. (2007). Reclaiming recess: Learning the language of persuasion. Language Arts, 84(5), 419.
Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 247–273.10.2307/3588504
Halliday, M A K & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd Edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93-116
Hasan, R. (2004). The concept of semiotic mediation: Perspectives from Bernstein’s sociology. In B. Davies, J.
Muller, & A. Morais (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein (pp. 48-61). London; New York: Routledge Falmer.
Herazo Rivera, J. D. (2012). Using a genre-based approach to promote oral communication in the Colombian English classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 109-126.
Humphrey, S., & Feez, S. (2016). Direct instruction fit for purpose: applying a metalinguistic toolkit to enhance creative writing in the early secondary years. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 39(3), 207-219.
Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L. (2011). Revisiting Joint Construction in the tertiary context. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 98-114.
Joice & Slade (2000). The nature of casual conversation: Implications for teaching. In H. Joice (Ed.),Teachers’ voices 6:Teaching casual conversation. Sidney. Macquarie.
Karpov, Y. (2018). Acquisition of scientific concepts as the content of school instruction. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E.
Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 102-116). New York: Routledge.
Khatibi, M. B. (2014). The effect of genre-based teaching on EFL learners' speaking performance. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 2(1), 38-52.
Koop, C. and Rose, D. (2008). ‘Reading to learn in Murdi Paaki: Changing outcomes for indigenous students’. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years. 16(1), 41-46.
Martin, J. R. and D. Rose. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
Martin, J. R., Christie, F., & Rothery,J. (1987). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 46-57). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London; Oakville: Equinox.
Martin, J.R. & D. Rose (2007) Interacting with Text: the Role of Dialogue in Learning to Read and Write, Foreign Languages in China. 4 (5): 66-80
McKay, P., Bowyer., L & Commins, L (2000). Teaching casual conversation for workplace communication. In H. Joice (Ed), Teachers’ voices 6:Teaching casual conversation. Sidney. Macquarie.
Millin, T. J., and Millin, M. W. (2014). Scaffolding academic literacy using the Reading to Learn intervention: An evaluation study of a tertiary education context in South Africa. Per Linguam, 30(3), 26-38.
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Rose, D. ( 2005a). Democratising the Classroom: a literacy pedagogy for the new generation. In Journal of Education, University of KwaZulu Natal, 25pp.
Rose, D. (2006). Towards a reading based theory of reading, Proceedings, 33rd international Systemic Functional Congress.
Rose, D. (2008). ‘Teaching reading and writing to aboriginal children’ in N. Harrison (ed.). Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Education. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
Rose, D. (2015). Reading to Learn: Accelerating learning and closing the gap. Teacher training books and DVDs. Sydney: Reading to Learn, http://www.readingtolearn.com.au
Rose, D. (2018). Languages of schooling: embedding literacy learning with genre-based pedagogy. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6/1, 59–89.
Rose, D. and J. R. Martin. (2012). Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
Schleppegrell, M. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(s1), 153-170. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x
Schleppegrell, M. (2017). Systemic functional grammar in the K-12 classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 3, pp. 384-396). New York: Routledge.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge.
Schleppegrell, M. J., Moore, J., Al-Adeimi, S., O’Hallaron, C., Palincsar, A., & Symons, C. (2014). Tackling a genre: Situating SFL genre pedagogy in a new context. Genre pedagogy across curriculum, 26-39.
Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge Cambridgeshire ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Whittaker, R. and C. Acevedo. (2016). ‘Working on literacy in CLIL/bilingual contexts: Reading to learn and teacher development’. Estudios Sobre Educación, 31: 37–55. doi: 10.15581/004.31.37-55
Whittaker, R., & Lövstedt, A.-C. (2017). Un proyecto europeo para la mejora de competencias discursivas en Europa: Reading to Learn en TeL4ELE. Lenguaje y Textos, 46, 29-39. doi:http://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2017.8712
Wilkins, G. (2018) A Genre-Based Approach to Speaking in EFL. Unpublished P.h.D dissertation. Aston University.
Arievitch, I. M., & Haenen, J. P. P. (2005). Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperin's approach. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 155-165. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4003_2
Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111-133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.03.001