Escrita de gêneros especializados e sua relação com a identidade disciplinar. Estudo de caso na engenharia industrial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n02a04Palavras-chave:
escrita, letramento disciplinar, gênero, função epistêmica da escrita, identidade disciplinarResumo
No presente artigo, analisamos como a escrita de um plano de marketing vinculase como trabalho de pesquisa de mercados, e como por meio da escrita desse plano os estudantes incorporam práticas de letramento disciplinar. A informação coletada através da observação de aulas e entrevistas com trinta estudantes do oitavo semestre de engenharia industrial permitiu mostrar a tese de que a escrita progressiva e autêntica de gêneros especializados pode preparar o estudante não apenas para compreender esses gêneros, mas também para desenvolver hábitos mentais ou formas de conhecer, fazer, pensar e agir (Gee, 1996), associados com seu trabalho disciplinar. Concluímos que as práticas de escrita situadas podem oferecer um referencial de explicação sobre a utilização dos gêneros acadêmicos e os modos de acessar e construir conhecimento, assim como desenvolver identidades que favoreçam a aprendizagem de domínios específicos.
Downloads
Referências
Artemeva, N. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act. A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389-421.
Artemeva, N. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. En Ch. Bazerman, A. Bonini, y D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
Baillie, C. y Johnson, A. (2008). A threshold model for attitudes in first year engineering students. En Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 129-141). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense publishers.
Bajtín, M. (1985). Estética de la creación verbal. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Ballou, R. (1999). Business logistics management. México: Prentice Hall.
Barton, D. y Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. En D. Barton, M. Hamilton y R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-14). Londres: Routledge.
Bazerman, Ch. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.
Bazerman, Ch. (2002). Genre and identity: Citizenship in the age of the internet and the age of global capitalism. En R. Coe, L. Lingard y T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 13-37). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Bazerman, Ch. (2011). Genre as social action. En J. Gee y M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Londres: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Bean, J. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2.a ed.). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
Berkenkotter, C. y Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge and disciplinary communication: Culture/cognition/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph. D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.
Camps, A., y Castelló, M. (2013). La escritura académica en la universidad. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 17-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5590
Carlino, P. (2013). Alfabetización académica diez años después. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 18(57), 355-381. Disponible en http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14025774003.
Cisneros, M. y Olave, G. (2012). Redacción y publicación de artículos científicos: un enfoque discursivo. Bogotá: Editorial ECOE.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3.a Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
De Tezanos, A. (2004). Una etnografía de la etnografía. Aproximaciones metodológicas para la enseñanza del enfoque cualitativo-interpretativo para la investigación social. Bogotá: Anthropos.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Funke, J. y Frensch, P. (2007). Complex problem solving: The European perspective —10 years after. En D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 25-47). Nueva York: Erlbaum.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Londres: Taylor & Francis.
Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student’s rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088394011001004
Hamilton, M. (2000). Expanding the new literacy studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as social practice. En D. Barton, M. Hamilton y R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in
context (pp. 16-34). Londres: Routledge.
Hernández-Zamora, G. (2016). Literacidad académica. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Herrington, A. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(4), 331-361.
Hyland, K. (2004 [2000]). Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385-395.
Klein, I. (2007). El taller del escritor universitario. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Lamb, Ch., Hair, J. y McDaniel, C. (2011). Marketing (11.a Ed.). México: Cengage Learning.
Latour, B. y Woolgar, S. (1986[1979]). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lea, M. y Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 11(3), 182-199.
Malhotra, N. K. (2008). Investigación de mercados: un enfoque aplicado (5.a Ed.). México: Pearson Educación.
Marinkovich, J., Sologuren, E., y Shawky, M. (2018). The process of academic literacy in Civil Engineering Informatics: An approach to academic writing and its genres in a learning community. Círculo de
Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 74, 195-220.
DOI:10.5209/CLAC.60520
McCutchen, D., Teske, P. y Bankston, C. (2008). Writing and cognition: Implications of the cognitive architecture for learning to write and writing to learn. En C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: history, society, school, individual, text (pp. 554-578). Nueva York y Londres, EE. UU. y Reino Unido: Taylor & Francis.
Moje, E. (2010). “Desarrollo de discursos, literacidades e identidades disciplinares: ¿cuál es su relación con el conocimiento? En G. López-Bonilla y C. Pérez Fragoso (Coords.), Discursos e identidades en contextos de cambio educativo. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés/ Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
Montes, M. y López-Bonilla, G. (2017). Literacidad y alfabetización disciplinar: enfoques teóricos y propuestas pedagógicas. Perfiles
Educativos, 39(165), 162-178. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-26982017000100162&lng=es&tlng=es
Narváez-Cardona, E. (2016). Latin-American writing initiatives in Engineering from Spanish-speaking countries. Ilha do Desterro, 69(3), 223-248. https://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n3p223
Natale, L. (Ed.) (2012). En carrera: escritura y lectura de textos académicos y profesionales. Los Polvorines: UNGS.
Navarro, F. (2010). ¿Qué son los géneros profesionales? Apuntes teórico-metodológicos para el estudio del discurso profesional. En Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Letras “Transformaciones culturales. Debates de la teoría, la crítica y la lingüística en el bicentenario”. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Navarro, F. y Revel Chion, A. (2013). Escribir para aprender. Disciplinas y escritura en la escuela secundaria. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Navarro, F. y Aparicio G. (2018). Manual de lectura, escritura y oralidad académicas para ingresantes a la universidad. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Nesi, H. y Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines. Student writing in higher education. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
Nogueira, S. (2003). Manual de lectura y escritura universitarias: prácticas de taller. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125-143.
Pires, S. y Carretero, L. (2007). Gestión de la cadena de suministro. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Prior, P. y Bilbro, R. (2012). Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. En M. Castelló y Ch. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic (pp. 19-31). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Quick, C. (2012). From the workplace to academia: Nontraditional students and the relevance of workplace experience in technical writing pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 230-250.
Rivera-Camino, J. (2009). Dirección de marketing. Fundamentos y aplicaciones (3.a Ed.). España: ESIC Editorial.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shaw, P. (2000). Towards classifying the arguments in research genres. En A. Trosberg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 41-56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stagnaro, D., y Natale, L. (2015). Géneros y formación ingenieril: de la universidad a la industria. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 8(16), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m8-16.gfiu
Street, B. (2005). At last: Recent applications of new literacy studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4), 417-423.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. y Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. En A. Johns (Ed.), Genres and the classroom –Multiple perspectives (pp. 105-119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Universidad de Granada (s. f.). Módulo estadística. Disponible en http://wpd.ugr.es/~bioestad/guia-spss/practica-8/
Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(4), 369-405.
Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87.
Winsor, D. (1990). Engineering writing/writing engineering. College Composition and Communication, 41(1), 58-70.
Winsor, D. (1996). Writing well as a form of social knowledge. En A. H. Duin y J. Hansen (Eds.), Nonacademic writing: social theory and technology (pp. 157-172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winsor, D. A. (1999). Genre and activity systems. The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16(2) 200-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088399016002003
Winsor, D. A. (2003). Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Categorias
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Íkala
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
