Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Responses to a Systemic Functional Linguistics Pedagogical Unit: An Experience in a Public University in Colombia




EFL, systemic functional linguistics, pre-service teachers, teacher education, functional grammar


Acknowledging the need for pre-service teachers to learn about language structures, many teacher preparation programs have incorporated grammar courses into their curriculum. Recently, there has been a push from Systemic Functional Linguistic (SFL) scholars to switch to more functional views of grammar in these courses. Such a switch, scholars claim, can better prepare pre-service teachers (PST) for writing across the curriculum and for teaching writing to their prospective students. Despite the potential benefits, many efl teacher preparation programs are still cautious about providing instruction on SFL. This has created a gap in terms of how pre-service teachers would respond to this type of instruction. Considering this gap, scholars from a university in Medellín, Colombia implemented a three-month pedagogical unit within a grammar course, which intended to move pre-service teachers from traditional to functional views of grammar. As they did this, they conducted a case study which explored how psts responded to the implementation of this unit. Data analysis shows that psts’ responses do not always move in a straight line, that is, from resistance, to caution, to openness, but may very well vary depending on the sfl concept or premise that is being taught. The results suggest that English grammar courses offered in teacher preparation programs can have traditional grammar as a starting point and then move PSTs towards more functional and critical views. They also suggest the need to identify some strategies that could be used with PSTs who show either caution or resistance.

= 605 veces | PDF
= 453 veces| | HTML
= 8 veces| | VISOR
= 3 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yenny Chavarría, University of Antioquia

M. A. Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia. Adjunct Faculty and researcher, School of Languages, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia

Dr. Doris Correa, University of Antioquia

Ed. Doctor in Language, Literacy and Culture, University of Massachusetts Amherst, usa. Full Professor, School of Languages, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia.


Accurso, K., Gebhard, M., & Purington, S. B. (2017). Analyzing diverse learners’ writing in mathematics: Systemic functional linguistics in secondary pre-service teacher education. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 84–108.

Achugar, M. & Carpenter, B. D. (2018). Critical SFL praxis principles in English language arts education: Engaging pre-service teachers in reflective practice. In R. Harman (Ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics (pp. 91–108). Springer.

Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal, 62(3), 276–283.

Assadi Aidinlou, N. (2012). An SFL-oriented framework for the teaching of reading in EFL context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 207–212.

Barletta, N., Chamorro, D., & Mizuno, J. (2020). La fuerza en la construcción del marco teórico en artículos científicos: un análisis desde la lingüística sistémica funcional. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(1), 75–91.

Bavali, M. & Sadighi, F. (2008). Chomsky’s universal grammar and Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics: An appraisal and a compromise. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(121), 11–28.

Brisk, M. E. & Parra, M. O. (2018). Mainstream classrooms as engaging spaces for emergent bilinguals: SFL theory, catalyst for change. In R. Harman (Ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics (pp. 127–152). Springer.

Brisk, M. & Zisselsberger, M. (2010). “We’ve let them in on the secret”: Using SFL theory to improve the teaching of writing to bilingual learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classroom (pp. 111-126). Routledge.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explore’s guide. Macquarie University.

Cardozo-Gaibisso, L. & Harman, R. (2019). Preparing in-service teachers to work with linguistically and culturally diverse youth: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. In G. Onchwari & J. Keengwe (Eds.), Handbook of research on engaging immigrant families and promoting academic success for English language learners (pp. 361–377). IGI Global.

Carpenter, B., Achugar, M., Walter, D., & Earhart, M. (2015). Developing teachers’ critical language awareness: A case study of guided participation. Linguistics and Education, 32, 82–97.

Chamorro, D. & Barletta, N., & Mizuno, J. (2013). El lenguaje para enseñar y aprender las ciencias naturales: un caso de oportunidades perdidas para la formación ciudadana. Revista Signos: Estudios de Lingüística, 46(81), 3–28.

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies learning by design (pp. 1–36). Palgrave McMillan.

Correa, D. & Echeverri, S. (2017). Using a systemic functional genre-based approach to promote a situated view of academic writing among PSTs. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 24(1), 44–62.

Cruz, C. (2016). Formal grammar instruction: Theoretical aspects to contemplate its teaching. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 15(10), 5–8.

De Oliveira, L. (2011). Linguistic approach in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: A focus on teacher education. Linguistics & the Human Sciences, 4(2), 101–133.

De Oliveira, L. C., Sembiante, S., & Ramírez, J. A. (2018). Bilingual academic language development in mathematics for emergent to advanced bilingual students. In S. Crespo, S. Celedón-Pattichis, & M. Civil (Eds.), Access and equity: Promoting high quality mathematics in grades 3–5 (81–98). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).

De Oliveira, L. C. & Avalos, M. (2018). Critical SFL praxis among teacher candidates: Using systemic functional linguistics in K-12 teacher education. In R. Harman (Ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics (pp. 109–123). Springer.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2010). From traditional grammar to functional grammar: Bridging the divide. NALDIC Quarterly, 8(1), 6–17.

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107.

Emilia, E. & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 155–182.

Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M., & Cox, B. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 247–273.

Fenwick, L., Humphrey, S., Quinn, M., & Endicott, M. (2014). Developing deep understanding about language in undergraduate pre-service teacher programs through the application of knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 1–38.

García, P. A., Sagre, A. M., & Lacharme, A. I. (2014). Systemic functional linguistics and discourse analysis as alternativeswhen dealing with texts. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(2), 101–116.

Gebhard, M., (2010). Teacher education in changing times: A systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 797–803.

Gebhard, M., Willett, J., Jimenez, J. P. & Piedra, A. (2011). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers’ professional development, and ELLs’ academic literacy practices.” In T. Lucas (Ed.) Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (91–110). Routledge.

Gebhard, M., Chen, I., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124.

Gebhard, M., Gunawan, W., & Chen, I.-A. (2014). Redefining conceptions of grammar in English education in Asia: SFL in practice. Applied Research on English Language, 3(2), 1–17.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.

Harman, R., Buxton, C., Cardozo-Gaibisso, L., Jiang, L., & Bui, K. (2020). Culturally sustaining systemic functional linguistics praxis in science classrooms. Language and Education.

Herazo, J. D. (2012). Using a genre-based approach to promote oral communication in the Colombian English classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 109-126.

Hinckley, D. (2015, August 27). ‘Narcos’ review: Realistic look at 1990s drug lord Pablo Escobar and his pursuer on Netflix. New York Daily News.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17–29.

Jenkins, J. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a lingua franca. Englishes in Practice 2015, 2(3), 49–85.

Knapp, P. , & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. UNSW Press.

Latin American Working Group (2018). Writing your letter: Don’t break Colombia’s heart. LAWG.

Love, N. & Ansaldo, U. (2010). The native speaker and the mother tongue. Language Sciences, 32, 589–593.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: The appraisal in English. Palgrave McMillan.

Medibiz TV. (n. d.). Being a woman. MediBiz TV.

Moss, G., Barletta, N., Chamorro, D., & Mizuno, J. (2013). La metáfora gramatical en los textos escolares de ciencias sociales en español. Onomazéin, 28(3), 88–104.

New London Group (NLG). (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). Routledge.

Nieto-Cruz, M. C. (2019). The role of systemic functional grammar in the expansion of nominal groups: el papel de la gramática sistémica funcional en la expansión de sintagmas nominales. PROFILE: Issues in Teacher Professional Development, 21(2), 97–112.

Padilla de la Cerda, F. (2016). The design of a theme-based and genre-oriented strategic reading course to improve students’ reading comprehension skills at a public school in Colombia. HOW Journal, 23(1), 49–67.

Palincsar, A. S., & Schleppegrell, M. (2014). Focusing on language and meaning while learning with text. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 616–623.

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan.

Rojas, I., Olave, G., & Cisneros, M. (2016). Alfabetización académica y pedagogía de género discursivo en la lingüística sistémico funcional. Una experiencia de trabajo. Revista Signos: Estudios de Lingüística, 49(1), 224–246.

Sagre, A., & Herazo, J. D. (2015). Generic, discourse, and lexicogrammatical characteristics of a listening exercise in an EFL classroom. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 20(1), 113–127.

Schall-Leckrone, L. & McQuillan, P. J. (2014). Collaboration within a teacher education program: Preparing history teachers to teach english learners. In J. Nagle (Ed.), Creating collaborative learning communities to improve English learner instruction, (83–100). Information Age.

Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schleppegrell, M. (2007). At last: The meaning in grammar. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 121–128.

Schleppegrell, M. & Go, A. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language Arts, 84(6), 529–538.

Schleppegrell, M. & Moore, J. (2018). Linguistic tools for supporting emergent critical language awareness in the elementary school. In R. Harman (Ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics (pp. 23–44). Springer.

Schwab, N. (2009, September 3). Colombia wants love from Washington: PR campaign hopes to bring new attention to the South American country. U.S. News.

Simmons, A. M. (2018). Student use of SFL resources on fantasy, canonical, and non-fiction texts: Critical literacy in the high school ELA classroom.” In R. Harman (Eds.), Bilingual learners and social equity (pp. 71–90). Springer.

Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.

Volckhausen, T. (2017, December 15). Colombian community leader allegedly murdered for standing up to palm oil. News Mongabay.,5

Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Palgrave McMillan.

Willett, J. & Correa, D. (2013). On making language visible: Reciprocal learning in a professional development alliance. In J. Nagle (Ed.), Creating collaborative learning communities to improve English learner instruction, (pp. 157–171). Information Age.

Young, L. & Fitzgerald, B. (2006). Language in the time of war. In The power of language (pp. 6–27). Equinox Publishing.

Zhang, X. (2018). Mitigating suburban English writing teachers’ constrained professional development through distance education: One case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5), 238–254.



How to Cite

Chavarría, Y., & Correa, D. (2020). Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Responses to a Systemic Functional Linguistics Pedagogical Unit: An Experience in a Public University in Colombia. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 26(1), 97–116.