Difficultés des enseignants d’anglais au moment de publier articles scientifiques dans des contextes périphériques: Perceptions des auteurset évaluateurs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a09Mots-clés :
écriture académique, examen par les pairs, publication des articles, diffusion des connaissances, revues scientifiquesRésumé
Publier dans des revues scientifiques est devenu aujourd’hui une nécessité pour les universitaires. Cet article présente les difficultés que des collègues d’anglais ont rencontrées pour que leurs textes puissent paraître dans une revue scienti-fique éditée en Colombie: au moyen d’une étude de cas de type exploratoire, nous montrons ce qu’a été leur expérience durant le processus d’évaluation de leurs manuscrits. Les résultats ont été obtenus à partir d’une étude de cas de type exploratoire qui a voulu connaitre les expériences des professeurs durant l’évaluation de leurs manuscrits. Les données ont été recueillies à partir d’un questionnaire auquel ont répondu 73 auteurs et de 17 formats d’évaluation des articles refusés ou susceptibles de correction de la part des arbitres. L’infor-mation a été complétée avec des notes recueillies pendant le flux du travail éditorial de la revue. Les résultats signalent les problèmes rencontrés par les auteurs, la façon de les gérer et les difficultés signalées par les évaluateurs. Ces résultats permettront aussi d’examiner les implications pour la formation de fu-turs enseignants et pour les processus éditoriaux des publications périodiques ou académiques.
Téléchargements
Références
Adnan, Z. (2009). Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language journals. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 107-125.
Arias, C. I., y Restrepo, M. I. (2009). La investigación-acción en educación: un camino hacia el desarrollo profesional y la autonomía. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 14(22), 109-122.
Banegas, D. L. (2018). Towards understanding EFL teachers’ conceptions of research: Findings from Argentina. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.61881.
Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 1-22.
Bourdieu, P. (1987). Los tres estados del capital cultural. Sociológica, 2(5), 11-17.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor y Francis Group.
Burns, A., y Westmacott, A. (2018). Teacher to researcher: Reflections on a new action research program for university EFL teachers. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.66236.
Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003). Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 223-243.
Canagarajah, S. (1996). “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13, 435-472.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002a). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (Ed.) (2002b). Celebrating local knowledge on language and education. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(4), 243-259.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2003). A somewhat legitimate and very peripheral participation. En C. P. Casanave y S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education (pp. 197-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cochran-Smith, M., y Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational researcher, 28(7), 15-25. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176137?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods and approaches (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Edge, J., y Richards, K. (Eds.). (1993). Teachers develop teachers research: Papers on classroom research and teacher development. Oxford: Heinemann.
Flowerdew, J. (1999a). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 243-248.
Flowerdew, J. (1999b). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 123-145.
Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate-peripheral participation, and the non-native English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 127-150.
Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121-149.
Flowerdew, J. (2007). The non-Anglophone scholar on the periphery of scholarly publication. AILA Review, 20(1), 14-27.
Freeman, D. (1989). Teacher training, development, and decision making: A model of teaching and related strategies for language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 27-45.
Golombek, P. R., y Johnson, K. E. (2017). Re-conceptualizing teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(2), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n2.65692.
Johnson, K. E., y Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Narrative inquiry as professional development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kemmis, S., y McTaggart (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers. Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Routledge Falmer.
Krings, H., Baumgartner, H. M., y Wild, C. (1979). Conceptos fundamentales de filosofía. Tomo tercero. Barcelona: Editorial Herder.
Li, Y. (2006). A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 456-478.
Lillis, T., y Curry, M. J. (2006). Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3-35. doi: 10.1177/0741088305283754.
Lillis, T., y Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lillis, T., Magyar, A., y Robinson-Pant, A. (2010). An international journal’s attempts to address inequalities in academic publishing: Developing a writing for publication programme. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 781-800.
Merriam, S. B. (1991). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moreno, A. I., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., López-Navarro, I., y Sachdev, I. (2012). Spanish researchers’ perceived difficulty writing research articles for English-medium journals: The impact of proficiency in English versus publication experience. Ibérica, 24, 157-184.
Níkleva, D. G., y Cortina Pérez, B. (2014). La producción científica actual en didáctica de la lengua y la literatura en revistas españolas. Porta Linguarum, 21(1), 281-299. Recuperado de http://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero21/18%20%20Dimitrinka.pdf
Orrego, L. M., y Mesa, C. (2005). Evaluación del componente investigativo de la licenciatura en lenguas extranjeras de la Escuela de Idiomas de la Universidad de Antioquia. En F. Vázquez Rodríguez (Ed.), La didáctica de la lengua extranjera. Estado de la discusión en Colombia (pp. 29-42). Cali: Universidad del Valle, Icfes.
Paltridge, B. (2015). Referees’ comments on submissions to peer reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 106-122. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.818641
Pérez-Llantada, C., Plo, R., y Ferguson, G. R. (2011). “You don’t say what you know, only what you can”: The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 18-30.
Quintero-Corzo, J., Munévar-Molina, R. A., y Munévar-Quintero, F. I. (2008). Semilleros de investigación: una estrategia para la formación de investigadores. Educación y educadores, 11(1), 31-42.
Rainey, I. (2005). EFL teachers’ research and mainstream TESOL: Ships passing in the night? Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 6(1), 7-21.
Richards, J., y Farrell, T. (2005). Professional development for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowland, F. (2002). The peer-review process. Learned publishing, 15(4), 247-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315102760319206.
Sharkey, J. (2009). Can we praxize second language teacher education? An invitation to join a collective, collaborative challenge. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 14(22), 125-150.
Sheridan, C. (2017). Blind peer review at an English language teaching journal: Glocalized practices within the globalization of higher education. En M. J. Curry y T. Lillis (Eds.), Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives, and pedagogies (pp. 136-150). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: Teoría y práctica. [Texto original, 2009: Case study research in practice. London: Sage. Traducción]. Madrid: Morata.
Smiles, T. L., y Short, K. G. (2006). Transforming teacher voice through writing for publication. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 133-147. Recuperado de http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795219.pdf
Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (1990). Basis of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher. Education, 34, 3-9. doi: 10.1177/002248718303400302
Zeichner, K. M. (2010). La formación del profesorado y la lucha por la justicia social. Madrid: Morata.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Íkala 2019
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
