Oportunidades e incentivos para tornar-se bilingue na Colômbia: Implicações para o Programa Nacional de Bilinguismo

Autores

  • José David Herazo Rivera Universidad de Córdoba
  • Sonia Jerez Rodríguez Universidad de Córdoba
  • Danilza Lorduy Arellano Universidad de Córdoba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.11093

Palavras-chave:

bilinguismo, Programa Nacional de Bilinguismo, oportunidade, incentivo, planejamento e política linguística, mercado de trabalho, contato interlingual

Resumo

O Programa Nacional de Bilinguismo (PNB) procura desenvolver domínio do inglês na sociedade colombiana com o fim de posicioná-la em processos mundiais de comunicação, na economia global e em um mundo cada vez mais intercultural. A partir de dados documentais e estatísticos, caracterizamos neste estudo de caso o PNB como um caso de planejamento linguístico de aquisição e argumentamos que algumas das condições sociais que promovem o bilinguismo não estão o suficientemente desenvolvidas no contexto colombiano. Especificamente, sustentamos que o número de vagas de trabalho que requerem trabalhadores bilingues e os padrões de mobilidade internacionais de colombianos(as) oferecem poucas oportunidades e incentivos para desenvolver o bilinguismo na dimensão que o PNB propõe.

|Resumo
= 326 veces | PDF (ENGLISH)
= 189 veces|

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

José David Herazo Rivera, Universidad de Córdoba

holds a Master’s degree in Education from Universidad del Norte, Colombia. He currently works as full time
professor at Universidad de Cordoba, Colombia.

Sonia Jerez Rodríguez, Universidad de Córdoba

holds a Master’s degree in Applied Linguistics from Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas, Colombia.
She currently works as a full time professor at University of Cordoba, Colombia

Danilza Lorduy Arellano, Universidad de Córdoba

holds a Master degree in Education from Universidad del Norte, Colombia. She currently works as full time
professor at Universidad de Cordoba, Colombia.

Referências

Ayala, J., & Álvarez, J. (2005). A perspective of the implications of the common European framework: implemention in the Colombian socio-cultural context. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 7, 7-26.

Bogotá city Council (2005). Bogotá Bilingüe Diez Años, Retrieved from: http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=18098

Bongaerts, T., & de Bot, K. (Eds.). (1997). Perspectives on foreign-language policy: studies in honour of Theo van Els. Amsterdam, Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Canto, M. (2008). Gobernanza y participación ciudadana en las políticas públicas frente al reto del desarrollo. Politica y Cultura, 30, 9-37.

Cárdenas, M. (2006). Bilingual Colombia: are we ready for it? What is needed? Paper presented at the 19th Annual English Australia Education Conference Perth, Australia.

Cárdenas, M. (2007). Language policies and classroom realities: bridging the gap. ASOCOPI Newsletter, 6 - 7. Retrieved from http://asocopi.org/files/newsletter_march_2007.pdf

Cely, R. (2009). Perfil del docente de inglés. Paper presented at the Congreso Nacional de Bilingüismo, Armenia, Colombia.

Cooper, R. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

DANE. (2007). Anuario estadístico: Entradas y salidas internacionales Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: DANE.

DANE. (2011a). Anuario estadístico: Entradas y salidas internacionales Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: DANE.

DANE. (2011b). Censo de población 2005. Retrieved from http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=307&Itemid=124

DANE. (2011c). Indicadores básicos de tecnologías de la información y la comunicación: Año 2010. Bogotá, Colombia: DANE.

DANE. (2012). Principales indicadores del mercado laboral: enero de 2012. Bogotá, Colombia.

De Ferranti, D., Perry, G., Ferreira, F., & Walton, M. (2004). Inequality in Latin America: breaking with history? Washington, DC: The World Bank.

De Mejía, A. (2006). Bilingual education in Colombia: towards a recognition of languages, cultures, and identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8, 152-168.

Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in Applied Linguistics. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Fasold, R. (1984). The sociolinguistics of society. Oxford, England; New York, NY: B. Blackwell.

García, O., & Kleinfgen, J. (2010). Emergent bilinguals: policies, programs, and practices for English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.

George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

González, A. (2007). Professional development of EFL teachers in Colombia: between colonial and local practices. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 12(18), 309-332.

González, A. (2009). On alternative and additional certifications in English language teaching: the case of Colombian EFL teachers' professional development. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura,14(22), 184-209.

Grin, F., Regina, J., & Ó Riagáin, D. (2003). Language policy evaluation and the european charter for regional or minority languages. Basingstoke, England; New York, N.Y: Palgrave Macmillan.

Guerrero, C. (2010). The portrayal of EFL teachers in official discourse: the perpetuation of disdain. PROFILE, 12(2), 33-49.

Herazo, J., & Donato, R. (in press). Mediating meaning in interaction: researching the connection between professional development and teacher practice. In B.,

Yoon & H., Kim (Eds.), Teachers' roles in second language learning: Classroom applications of sociocultural theory.

Hornberger, N. (1994). Literacy and language planning. Language and Education, 8(1/2), 75 - 86.

Hornberger, N. (2006). Frameworks and models in language planning. In T., Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

McDonald, J., Klein, E., & Riordan, M. (2009). Going to scale with new school desings: reinventing high school. New York, NY; London, England: Teachers College Press.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2005a). Bases para una nación bilingüe y competitiva. Retrieved from http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/propertyvalue-32266.html

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2005b). Colombia Aprende. Retrieved from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/productos/1685/article-158720.html

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006a). Decreto 3870. Retrieved from http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-112277.html

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006b). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: Inglés. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006c). Vision 2019: Educación propuesta de discusión. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Educacion Nacional.

Ministry of Culture (2009). Government bill language for all. Stockholm, Sweden.

Paulston, C. (1987). Catalán and Occitan: comparative test cases for a theory of language maintenance and shift. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 31-62.

Payne, M. (2007). Foreign language planning: towards a supporting framework. Language problems & language planning, 31(3), 235-256.

Quintero, A. (2007). The place of language teachers' decision making in the hierarchy of planning functions in the language-teaching operation. ASOCOPI Newsletter, 8-9. Retrieved from http://asocopi.org/files/newsletter_march_2007.pdf

Renique, A. (1997). NAP as a basis for a coherent FLT policy. In T., Bongaerts, & K., Bot (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign-language policy: studies in honour of Theo van Els. Amsterdam, Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196 - 213.

Samoilovich, D. (2008). Pathways to innovation: rethinking the government of public universities in Latin America. In A., Gazzola, & A., Didriksson (Eds.), Trends in higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 307-366). Caracas, Venezuela: UNESCO IESALC.

Sánchez, A., & Obando, G. (2008). Is Colombia ready for ''bilingualism''? PROFILE, 9, 181-195.

Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: hidden agendas and new approaches. London, England; New York, NY: Routledge.

Sottoli, S. (2002). La política social en América Latina: Diez dimensiones para el análisis y el diseño de políticas, Papeles de Población, 34, 43-63.

Spolsky, B., & Shohamy, E. (1997). Planning foreign language education: an Israeli perspective. In T., Bongaerts, & K., Bot (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign-language policy: studies in honour of Theo van Els. Amsterdam, Netherlands; Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins.

Tochon, F. (2009). The key to global understanding: world languages education why schools need to adapt. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 650 - 681. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325898

Usma, J. (2009a). Education and language policy in Colombia: Exploring processes of inclusion, exclusion, and stratification in times of global reform. PROFILE, 11, 123-141.

Usma, J. (2009b). Globalization and language and education reform in Colombia: A critical outlook. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 14(22), 19-42.

Valencia, S. (2007). Implications of ''bilingüismo'' and globalization processes in Colombia: insights from research on ELT policy and practice. ASOCOPI Newsletter, 14-15. Retrieved from http://asocopi.org/files/newsletter_march_2007.pdf

Downloads

Publicado

2012-09-11

Como Citar

Herazo Rivera, J. D., Jerez Rodríguez, S., & Lorduy Arellano, D. (2012). Oportunidades e incentivos para tornar-se bilingue na Colômbia: Implicações para o Programa Nacional de Bilinguismo . Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 17(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.11093

Edição

Seção

Estudos de Caso