O papel dos gestos na construção de significados na sala de aula

Autores

  • Alejandra Beatriz Menti Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9226-2582
  • Celia Renata Rosemberg Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n03a06

Palavras-chave:

função dos gestos, construção de significados, vocabulário, aulas de ciências sociais, ensino fundamental

Resumo

O presente trabalho analisa a função que cumprem os gestos feitos por docentes e alunos durante a abordagem de vocabulário específico, não familiar ou pouco frequente em aulas de ciências sociais no ensino fundamental. Empregou-se um procedimento qualitativo, o método comparativo constante (Glasser & Strauss, 1967), para analisar aquelas sequências interacionais em que docente e alunos explicaram ou esclareceram o significado de uma palavra, corrigiram o uso de um termo ou perceberam uma ruptura na comunicação. Os resultados evidenciaram que todos os interlocutores das sequências interacionais observadas –professoras e crianças– fazem gestos quando solicitam um termo específico, descrevem ações ou um objeto em particular e quando elaboram definições contextuais de maneira conjunta. Ainda quando professoras e alunos fazem os mesmos gestos na abordagem de palavras, a função que desempenham os gestos de uns e outros varia dentro da sequência interacional.

|Resumo
= 725 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 467 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 21 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 35 veces| | (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Alejandra Beatriz Menti, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

Ph.D. in Language Sciences, B.A in Applied Linguistics (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba). Assistant Researcher at the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research of Argentina (CONICET).

Celia Renata Rosemberg, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

Ph.D. in Education (University of Buenos Aires). Principal Researcher of the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research of Argentina (CONICET). Director of the Research Centre for Mathematical and Experimental Psychology (CIIPME-CONICET).

Referências

Referencias:

Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., y Rosenthal, R. (2004). Prediction of students’ evaluations from brief instances of professors’ nonverbal behavior in defined instructional situations. Social Psychology of Education, 7(1), 3-33.

Barowy, W., y Smith, J. (2008). Ecology and development in classroom communication. Linguistics and Education, 19, 149-165.

Beals, D., y Tabors, P. (1995). Arboretum, bureaucratic and carbohydrates: Preschoolers’ exposure to rare vocabulary at home. First Language, 15, 57-76.

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.

Cameron, R. (2011). Mixed methods research: The five Ps framework. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), 96-108.

Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., y Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047-1058.

Creswell, J. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, (4.a ed., pp. 269-283).

Crowder, E. M., y Newman, D. (1993). Telling what they know: The role of gesture and language in children’s science explanations. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1(2), 341-376.

Edwards, L. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 127-141.

Furuyama, N. (2000). Gestural interaction between the instructor and the learner in origami instruction. En D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 99-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gaythwaite, E. S. (2005). Didn’t you see what I meant? Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 7(1-2), 97-108. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Gibaja, R. (1988). Acerca del debate metodológico en la investigación educacional. La educación. Revista Interamericana de Desarrollo Educativo (OEA), 103, 81-94.

Glaser, B. G., y Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Gobierno de la Provincia de Córdoba (s. f.). Provincia. Ubicación. Recuperado de http://www.cba.gov.ar/provincia/aspectos-generales/

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help us Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). Talking and thinking with our hands. Psychological Science, 15(1), 34-39.

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). How gesture works to change our minds. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 4-6.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., y Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 720-730.

Goldin-Meadow, S., y Singer, M. A. (2003). From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in teaching and learning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 509-520.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.

Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53-73.

Goodwin, C., y Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 238-307.

Gumperz, J. (1982). Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., y Maris, E. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260-267.

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects for the process of the utterance. En M. R. Key (Ed.), The Relation Between Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication (pp. 207-227). The Hague: Mouton and Co.

Kendon, A. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? En D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 47-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krauss, R. K., Chen, Y., y Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. En D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 261-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lemke, J. (1998). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247-271.

Lemke, J. L. (1999). Typological and topological meaning in diagnostic discourse. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 173-185.

Levinson, S. (1997). From outer to inner space: Linguistic categories and non linguistic thinking. En J. Nuyts, y E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and Conceptualization (pp. 13-45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33(5), 703-736. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350-371.

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McNeill, D. (2016). Why we Gesture. The Surprising Role of Hand Movements in Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mehrabian, A. (1967). Orientation behaviors and nonverbal attitude communication. Journal of Communication, 17(4), 324-332.

Menti, A., y Alam, F. (2014). Los gestos y la enseñanza de palabras poco familiares: ¿cuándo emplean las maestras información gestual? Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 7(1), 17-32.

Migdalek, M. J., y Rosemberg, C. R. (2012). El uso de los gestos en el discurso docente durante la planificación del juego en el jardín de infantes. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 5(3), 25-43.

Mondada, L. (2001). Por una lingüística interaccional. Discurso y Sociedad, 3(3), 61-89.

Nelson, K. (1996). Language in Cognitive Development. The Emergence of the Mediated Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds. Experience, Meaning and Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Newman, D., y Crowder, E. (1991). Teacher support for sense-making in classroom conversation. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, Illinois.

Orellana, M., Martínez, D., Lee, C., y Montano, E. (2012). Language as a tool in diverse forms of learning. Linguistics and Education, 23, 373-387.

Roth, W. M. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(11), 1683-1714.

Roth, W. M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365-392.

Roth, W. M. (2002). Reading graphs: Contributions to an integrative concept of literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 1-24.

Roth, W. M., y Lawless, D. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction, 12, 285-304.

Roth, W. M., y Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 103-136.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., Lucio, P. B., y Pérez, M. L. C. (1998). Metodología de la investigación. México D. F., México: McGraw Hill.

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., y Sacks, H. E. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382. Singer, M. A., y Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teacher’s gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85-89.

Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Londres: Sage Publications.

Tomasello, M. (1998). Introduction: A cognitive-functional perspective on language structure. En M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. vii-xxiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A UsageBased Theory of Language Acquisition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Valles, M. (2003). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis.

Weizman, Z. O., y Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 265-279.

Wells, G. (1998). Modes of meaning in a science activity. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 307-334.

Publicado

2017-10-11

Como Citar

Menti, A. B., & Rosemberg, C. R. (2017). O papel dos gestos na construção de significados na sala de aula. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 22(3), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n03a06

Edição

Seção

Estudos Empíricos